Early Reoperation Rates and Its Risk Factors after Instrumented Spinal Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Spinal Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study of 65,355 Patients

被引:9
作者
Kim, Jihye [1 ]
Ryu, Hwan [2 ]
Kim, Tae-Hwan [2 ]
机构
[1] Hallym Univ, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hosp, Dept Pediat, Div Infect,Coll Med, Seoul 05355, South Korea
[2] Hallym Univ, Coll Med, Sacred Heart Hosp, Spine Ctr,Dept Orthoped, Anyang 14068, South Korea
关键词
reoperation; risk factor; prediction; spinal fusion; instrumentation; surgical approach; degenerative spinal disease; big data;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11123338
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Reoperation is a major concern in spinal fusion surgery for degenerative spinal disease. Earlier reported reoperation rates were confined to a specific spinal region without comprehensive analysis, and their prediction models for reoperation were not statistically validated. Our study aimed to present reasonable base rates for reoperation according to all possible risk factors and build a validated prediction model for early reoperation. In our nationwide population-based cohort study, data between 2014 and 2016 were obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance claims database. Patients older than 19 years who underwent instrumented spinal fusion surgery for degenerative spinal diseases were included. The patients were divided into cases (patients who underwent reoperation) and controls (patients who did not undergo reoperation), and risk factors for reoperation were determined by multivariable analysis. The estimates of all statistical models were internally validated using bootstrap samples, and sensitivity analyses were additionally performed to validate the estimates by comparing the two prediction models (models for 1st-year and 3rd-year reoperation). The study included 65,355 patients: 2939 (4.5%) who underwent reoperation within 3 years after the index surgery and 62,146 controls. Reoperation rates were significantly different according to the type of surgical approach and the spinal region. The third-year reoperation rates were 5.3% in the combined lumbar approach, 5.2% in the posterior lumbar approach, 5.0% in the anterior lumbar approach, 3.0% in the posterior thoracic approach, 2.8% in the posterior cervical approach, 2.6% in the anterior cervical approach, and 1.6% in the combined cervical approach. Multivariable analysis identified older age, male sex, hospital type, comorbidities, allogeneic transfusion, longer use of steroids, cages, and types of surgical approaches as risk factors for reoperation. Clinicians can conduct comprehensive risk assessment of early reoperation in patients who will undergo instrumented spinal fusion surgery for degenerative spinal disease using this model.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Long-term reoperation rates and causes for reoperations following lumbar microendoscopic discectomy and decompression: 10-year follow-up
    Aihara, Takato
    Kojima, Atsushi
    Urushibara, Makoto
    Endo, Kenji
    Sawaji, Yasunobu
    Suzuki, Hidekazu
    Nishimura, Hirosuke
    Murata, Kazuma
    Konishi, Takamitsu
    Yamamoto, Kengo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 95 : 123 - 128
  • [2] Revision surgery and mortality following complex spine surgery: 2-year follow-up in a prospective cohort of 679 patients using the Spine AdVerse Event Severity (SAVES) system
    Bari, Tanvir Johanning
    Karstensen, Sven
    Sorensen, Mathias Dahl
    Gehrchen, Martin
    Street, John
    Dahl, Benny
    [J]. SPINE DEFORMITY, 2020, 8 (06) : 1341 - 1351
  • [3] Daniel Kahneman, 2017, Thinking, fast and slow
  • [4] Demographic, Clinical, and Operative Factors Affecting Long-Term Revision Rates After Cervical Spine Arthrodesis
    Derman, Peter B.
    Lampe, Lukas P.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    Pan, Ting Jung
    Kueper, Janina
    Girardi, Federico P.
    Albert, Todd J.
    Lyman, Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 98 (18) : 1533 - 1540
  • [5] Eichholz KM, 2003, NEUROSURG FOCUS, V15, P1, DOI [10.3171/foc.2003.15.3.1, DOI 10.3171/FOC.2003.15.3.1]
  • [6] Reoperation Rates Following Instrumented Lumbar Spine Fusion
    Irmola, Tero Matti
    Hakkinen, Arja
    Jarvenpaa, Salme
    Marttinen, Ilkka
    Vihtonen, Kimmo
    Neva, Marko
    [J]. SPINE, 2018, 43 (04) : 295 - 301
  • [7] The Long-term Reoperation Rate Following Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis A Nationwide Sample Cohort Study With a 10-year Follow-up
    Jung, Jong-myung
    Chung, Chun Kee
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Choi, Yunhee
    Kim, Min-Jung
    Yim, Dahae
    Yang, Seung Heon
    Lee, Chang Hyun
    Hwang, Sung Hwan
    Kim, Dong Hwan
    Yoon, Joon Ho
    Park, Sung Bae
    [J]. SPINE, 2020, 45 (18) : 1277 - 1284
  • [8] Inpatient Outcomes and Postoperative Complications After Primary Versus Revision Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgeries for Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease: A National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample Analysis, 2002-2011
    Kalakoti, Piyush
    Missios, Symeon
    Maiti, Tanmoy
    Konar, Subhas
    Bir, Shyamal
    Bollam, Papireddy
    Nanda, Anil
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 85 : 114 - 124
  • [9] The Long-term Reoperation Rate Following Surgery for Lumbar Herniated Intervertebral Disc Disease
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Chung, Chun Kee
    Choi, Yunhee
    Kim, Min-Jung
    Yim, Dahae
    Yang, Seung Heon
    Lee, Chang Hyun
    Jung, Jong-Myung
    Hwang, Sung Hwan
    Kim, Dong Hwan
    Yoon, Joon Ho
    Park, Sung Bae
    [J]. SPINE, 2019, 44 (19) : 1382 - 1389
  • [10] Reoperation within 2 years after lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
    Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi
    Ando, Kei
    Kato, Fumihiko
    Kanemura, Tokumi
    Sato, Koji
    Hachiya, Yudo
    Matsubara, Yuji
    Kamiya, Mitsuhiro
    Sakai, Yoshihito
    Yagi, Hideki
    Shinjo, Ryuichi
    Nishida, Yoshihiro
    Ishiguro, Naoki
    Imagama, Shiro
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (08) : 1972 - 1980