What do local stakeholders think about the impacts of small hydroelectric plants? Using Q methodology to understand different perspectives

被引：16

作者：

Pagnussatt, Daiane ^{[1
]}

Petrini, Maira ^{[1
]}

Matte Zanardo dos Santos, Ana Clarissa ^{[1
]}

da Silveira, Lisilene Mello ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul PUCRS, Av Ipiranga 6681, BR-90619900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

来源：

ENERGY POLICY | 2018年 / 112卷

关键词：

Small hydroelectric plants; Local stakeholders; Impacts; Renewable energies; Q methodology; RENEWABLE ENERGY; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; SMALL HYDROPOWER; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE; WIND ENERGY; POLICY; CORPORATIONS; GOVERNANCE; SCENARIO;

D O I：

10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.029

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

Researchers, politicians and investors are seeking to develop an agenda related to renewable energy technology and its greatest challenges and opportunities. The present study aims to analyze the perceptions of local stakeholders regarding the social, environmental and economic impacts of small hydroelectric plants. The use of Q Methodology revealed the existence of a range of perceptions among local stakeholders. Essentially, five groups with different perceptions were identified, namely: 'I'm critical', "I see regional benefits', 'I want more results', 'I want social well-being' and 'I weigh all sides'. The article recommends policy-makers should increase transparency and communication regarding the activities related to projects of this nature, in addition to emphasizing the need to review the policies that regulate the energy system.

引用

页码：372 / 380

页数：9

共 47 条

[1] Small hydro and the environmental implications of its extensive utilization [J].

Abbasi, Tasneem ;

Abbasi, S. A. .

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (04) :2134-2143

[2]

ANEEL, 2012, BANC INF GER, P103

[3]

ANEEL - Agencia Nacional de Energia Eletrica, 2014, BANC INF GER

[4] Contribution of SHP Stations to the development of an area and their social acceptance [J].

Arabatzis, Garyfallos ;

Myronidis, Dimitris .

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (08) :3909-3917

[5]

Bardin L, 2010, ANALISE CONTEUDO, P70

[6]

Brown S.R., 2007, HDB RES METHODS PUBL, V2nd, P721

[7]

Brown SR, 1996, OPERANT SUBJECTIVITY, V18, P1

[8] Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via social indicators: Results of a survey among European energy experts [J].

Carrera, Diana Gallego ;

Mack, Alexander .

ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (02) :1030-1039

[9] Strategic planning to reduce conflicts for offshore wind development in Taiwan: A social marketing perspective [J].

Chen, Jyun-Long ;

Liu, Hsiang-Hsi ;

Chuang, Ching-Ta .

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2015, 99 (1-2) :195-206

[10] Cross-sectoral coordination for sustainable solutions in Croatia: The (meta) governance of energy efficiency [J].

Christopoulos, Stamatios ;

Demir, Cansu ;

Kull, Michael .

ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 99 :57-87

← 1 2 3 4 5 →