Does board gender diversity affect capital structure decisions?

被引:16
作者
Ben Saad, Sourour [1 ]
Belkacem, Lotfi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sousse, Inst High Commercial Studies Sousse, Lab Res Econ Management & Quantitat Finance LaREM, Sousse, Tunisia
来源
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY | 2022年 / 22卷 / 05期
关键词
Gender; Decision-making; Boards of directors; Boardroom effectiveness; Corporate governance; Information transparency; Firm risk-taking; Capital structure; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; FIRM PERFORMANCE; DIRECTORS; QUALITY; RISK; OWNERSHIP; EARNINGS; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT; LEADERSHIP;
D O I
10.1108/CG-12-2020-0575
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the indirect relationship between board gender diversity and capital structure decisions and to examine whether the capital structure is affected by the type of approach used to promote women's participation in the boardroom. Design/methodology/approach Based on a sample of French non-financial listed companies over the period 2006-2019, this paper uses structural equations modeling, difference-in-differences using propensity score matching and chow test to highlight these effects. Findings This paper finds that the relationship between the board gender diversity and the capital structure is mediated through the information transparency channel and firm risk taking channel. Furthermore, the results show that the effect of board gender diversity on capital structure decisions varies through the approach adopted (voluntary, enabling or coercive). Originality/value This paper contributes to the literature in several ways. First, the study is to the knowledge the first to examine whether and how board gender diversity affects capital structure decisions through two mediations channels, namely, the information transparency and the firm risk taking. Second, the study is one of the first to examine whether the capital structure is affected by the type of approach used to promote women's participation in the boardroom: coercive, enabling or voluntary approach.
引用
收藏
页码:922 / 946
页数:25
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Does gender diversity on corporate boards reduce information asymmetry in equity markets? [J].
Abad, David ;
Encarnacion Lucas-Perez, Maria ;
Minguez-Vera, Antonio ;
Yague, Jose .
BRQ-BUSINESS RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2017, 20 (03) :192-205
[2]   Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance [J].
Adams, Renee B. ;
Ferreira, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 94 (02) :291-309
[3]   Board gender diversity and the capital structure of microfinance institutions: A global analysis [J].
Adusei, Michael ;
Obeng, Emmanuella Yaa Takyiwah .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2019, 71 :258-269
[4]   Portfolio choice and trading in a large 401(k) plan [J].
Agnew, J ;
Balduzzi, P ;
Sundén, A .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (01) :193-215
[5]   Board of directors' composition and capital structure [J].
Alves, Paulo ;
Barbosa Couto, Eduardo ;
Morais Francisco, Paulo .
RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2015, 35 :1-32
[6]   MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD AND NONLINEAR 3-STAGE LEAST-SQUARES ESTIMATOR IN GENERAL NONLINEAR SIMULTANEOUS EQUATION MODEL [J].
AMEMIYA, T .
ECONOMETRICA, 1977, 45 (04) :955-968
[7]   Earnings management, capital structure, and the role of institutional environments [J].
An, Zhe ;
Li, Donghui ;
Yu, Jin .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2016, 68 :131-152
[8]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[9]   Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study [J].
Barsky, RB ;
Juster, FT ;
Kimball, MS ;
Shapiro, MD .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (02) :537-579
[10]   Managerial power and rent extraction in the design of executive compensation [J].
Bebchuk, LA ;
Fried, JM ;
Walker, DI .
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 2002, 69 (03) :751-846