EUV telecentricity and shadowing errors impact on process margins

被引:9
|
作者
Civay, D. [1 ]
Hosler, E. [1 ]
Chauhan, V. [1 ]
Neogi, T. Guha [1 ]
Smith, L. [1 ]
Pritchard, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Malta, NY 12020 USA
来源
关键词
EUV; Monte Carlo; overlay budget; telecentricity error; design rules; shadowing; anamorphic mask; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1117/12.2087639
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Monte Carlo simulations are used in the semiconductor industry to evaluate variability limits in design rule generation, commonly for interaction between different layers. The variability of the geometry analyzed is determined mainly by the lithography, process and OPC used. Monte Carlo methods for design rule evaluation can provide the requisite level of accuracy, and are suitable for two or more layer interactions because the variations on one can be assumed to be independent of variations on the other(s). The variability parameters and budget utilized in optical Monte Carlo simulations is well-established. With the upcoming implementation of EUV lithography the variability budget will be impacted. EUV has an off-axis illumination angle that complicates the lithography process by causing telecentricity and shadowing errors. Telecentricity errors manifest as a printed feature being shifted relative to the design. The amount the feature is shifted is a function of the pattern density and design. Shadowing is caused by the 3D nature of the mask combined with EUV reflective mask technology. A shadow occurs at feature edges, where the source does not fully illuminate. Telecentricity and shadowing errors, although small at the 10 nm node, will increase in relative size compared to the features printed beyond the 7 nm node. Telecentricity and shadowing errors are complex in nature and can't be compensated for with a flat bias. These errors unique to EUV are incorporated into Monte Carlo simulations and evaluated against the standard cell design layers. The effect of these variability parameters is evaluated on critical 7 nm node layout clips.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact on OPC and SRAF caused by EUV shadowing effect
    Jiang, Fan
    SOLID STATE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 57 (01) : 27 - 30
  • [2] Evaluation of Shadowing and Flare Effect for EUV Tool
    Moon, James
    Kim, Cheol-Kyun
    Nam, Byoung-Sub
    Nam, Byoung-Ho
    Hyun, Yoon-Suk
    Kim, Suk-Kyun
    Lim, Chang-Moon
    Kim, Yong-Dae
    Kim, Mun-Sik
    Choi, Yong-Kyoo
    Kim, Chang-Reol
    Yim, Donggyu
    ALTERNATIVE LITHOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES, 2009, 7271
  • [3] Shadowing effect modeling and compensation for EUV lithography
    Song, Hua
    Zavyalova, Lena
    Su, Irene
    Shiely, James
    Schmoeller, Thomas
    EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET (EUV) LITHOGRAPHY II, 2011, 7969
  • [4] Shadowing effect minimization in EUV mask by modeling
    Besacier, M
    Schiavone, P
    PHOTOMASK AND NEXT GENERATION LITHOGRAPHY MASK TECHNOLOGY XI, 2004, 5446 : 849 - 859
  • [5] Margins and Errors
    Weatherson, Brian
    INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2013, 56 (01): : 63 - 76
  • [6] Advanced Multilayer Mirror Design to Mitigate EUV Shadowing
    Sherwin, Stuart
    Waller, Laura
    Neureuther, Andrew
    Naulleau, Patrick
    EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET (EUV) LITHOGRAPHY X, 2019, 10957
  • [7] Shadowing 3D Mask Effects in EUV
    Barouch, Eytan
    PHOTOMASK AND NEXT-GENERATION LITHOGRAPHY MASK TECHNOLOGY XIX, 2012, 8441
  • [8] The economic impact of EUV lithography on critical process modules
    Mallik, Arindam
    Horiguchi, Naoto
    Bommels, Jurgen
    Thean, Aaron
    Barla, Kathy
    Vandenberghe, Geert
    Ronse, Kurt
    Ryckaert, Julien
    Mercha, Abdelkarim
    Laith, Altimime
    Verkest, Diederik
    Steegen, An
    EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET (EUV) LITHOGRAPHY V, 2014, 9048
  • [9] The impact of EUV mask defects on lithographic process performance
    Evanschitzky, P
    Erdmann, A
    20TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON MASK TECHNOLOGY FOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND MICROCOMPONENTS, 2004, 5504 : 111 - 119
  • [10] Errors and margins in radiotherapy
    van Herk, M
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2004, 14 (01) : 52 - 64