Ropivacaine 1 mg/ml, plus fentanyl 2 μg/ml for epidural analgesia during labour.: Is mode of administration important?

被引:22
作者
Smedvig, JP [1 ]
Soreide, E
Gjessing, L
机构
[1] Cent Hosp Rogaland, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
[2] Cent Hosp Rogaland, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
关键词
analgesia; patient controlled epidural; obstetric; local anesthetic; ropivacaine; analgesics; fentanyl;
D O I
10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045005595.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with a moderate to high concentration of bupivacaine in obstetrics has been shown to give comparable analgesia and even higher level of satisfaction compared to continuous epidural infusion. We hypothesised that the use of a very low concentration technique (ropivacaine/fentanyl) might result in excessive dosing in the PCEA group, more motor blockade and a negative impact on spontaneous delivery rate. Methods: We conducted a randomised, double-blind study of 60 nulliparous women at term comparing low concentration ropivacaine/fentanyl administered in either patient-controlled or fixed continuous infusion mode. Parturients with known predictors of painful deliveries, i.e. breech presentation, primary induction of labour, were not included. Deliveries within 90 min from the start of epidural analgesia were omitted from the evaluation. Results: We found that both groups required a mean of 12 ml/h low concentration mixture (loading and midwife rescue boluses included). There was no difference between groups with respect to spontaneous delivery rate (71%). This low concentration technique resulted in haemodynamic stability without crystalloid preloading, infusion or vasopressor use. Motor blockade of clinical importance was not detected in any patient. Conclusion: We conclude that epidural use of ropivacaine 1 mg/ml+fentanyl 2 mug/ml provides effective analgesia with equal volume requirements irrespective of administration mode, with a high spontaneous delivery rate. Choice of PCEA or CEI (continuous epidural infusion) should be directed by other considerations, most importantly compliance of midwife and possible reduction in workload for anaesthesiology staff.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 599
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Epidural ropivacaine for the initiation of labor epidural analgesia: A dose finding study [J].
Beilin, Y ;
Galea, M ;
Zahn, J ;
Bodian, CA .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (06) :1340-1345
[2]   Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour [J].
Capogna, G ;
Celleno, D ;
Fusco, P ;
Lyons, G ;
Columb, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (03) :371-373
[3]   Normal saline IV fluid load decreases uterine activity in active labour [J].
Cheek, TG ;
Samuels, P ;
Miller, F ;
Tobin, M ;
Gutsche, BB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 77 (05) :632-635
[4]   Walking with labor epidural analgesia - The impact of bupivacaine concentration and a lidocaine-epinephrine test dose [J].
Cohen, SE ;
Yeh, JY ;
Riley, ET ;
Vogel, TM .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 92 (02) :387-392
[5]   DETERMINATION OF THE MINIMUM LOCAL ANALGESIC CONCENTRATIONS OF EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE AND LIDOCAINE IN LABOR [J].
COLUMB, MO ;
LYONS, G .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (04) :833-837
[6]  
FERRANTE FM, 1991, ANESTH ANALG, V73, P547
[7]   Ropivacaine, 0.1% plus sufentanil, 0.5 μg/ml, versus bupivacaine, 0.1% plus sufentanil, 0.5 μg/ml, using patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor -: A double-blind comparison [J].
Fischer, C ;
Blanié, P ;
Jaouën, E ;
Vayssière, C ;
Kaloul, I ;
Coltat, JC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 92 (06) :1588-1593
[8]  
GJESSING LK, 2000, HOMEPAGE DEP OBSTET
[9]  
JAMES K, 1988, BRIT J ANAESTH, V81, P507
[10]   Extradural pain relief in labour: Bupivacaine sparing by extradural fentanyl is dose dependent [J].
Lyons, G ;
Columb, M ;
Hawthorne, L ;
Dresner, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 78 (05) :493-497