Evidence-based health care: development and audit of a clinical standard for research and its impact on an NHS trust

被引:11
|
作者
Parkin, C
Bullock, I
机构
[1] Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust, Nursing Res Unit, London, England
[2] Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust, Dept Educ, London, England
关键词
research; clinical standard; dynamic quality improvement; survey;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01080.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background. Working within a modern National Health Service in the United Kingdom, the place for research and its dissemination is increasingly important. The organization of this within each National Health Service (NHS) Trust is challenging but nevertheless essential. If health care professionals are to be empowered to adopt an evidence-based approach in both the planning and delivery of care, research aware employees are crucial. Aims and objectives. This paper highlights the importance of NHS hospital trusts implementing initiatives that will facilitate this process. One such initiative has been the development and survey of a clinical standard for research. The primary development aim was to provide a benchmark standard for all nursing research. The standard was developed to fit within the current dynamic quality improvement (DQI) programme and has directly contributed to an evolving culture of research by shaping nurses' awareness, and offering a support and consultancy network within the Trust. The standard is one aspect of a research awareness programme, with the primary objective of providing guidance and education whilst developing nurses throughout the research process. The planned strategic outcome is to see a positive outcome on the quality of research in the Trust. Design. A baseline survey was conducted to provide a definitive snap shot of research understanding and practice within the Trust following the introduction of the research standard. Methods. The standard was developed by a team of clinicians led by a member of the quality team, to ensure that it fitted the DQI structure, and a member of the Nursing Research Unit (NRU). The standard was distributed to every clinical area and 192 nurses were surveyed to evaluate its impact on their awareness of educational opportunities, their use of the consultancy and support service, their use of other support services, their research utilization and research quality. Results. The survey demonstrated that the implementation of the standard had increased awareness related to both formal and informal educational and research opportunities. It identified current nurses' strengths and weaknesses relative to all aspects of the research process, particularly in obtaining ethical approval for studies. A rolling programme of research education enabled nurses to gain essential knowledge and skills in supporting their developing research awareness, consumption and conduct of research. Relevance to clinical practice. The NRU, through this process, has formed an effective alliance between clinical nurses and research facilitators in promoting high quality research. The foundations to continue to support this within the Trust are now well established.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 425
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Using qualitative research to enhance the evidence-based practice of health care providers
    Ritchie, JE
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 1999, 45 (04): : 251 - 256
  • [2] Evidence-based practice in primary health care
    De Smedt, Anouk
    Buyl, Ronald
    Nyssen, Marc
    UBIQUITY: TECHNOLOGIES FOR BETTER HEALTH IN AGING SOCIETIES, 2006, 124 : 651 - 656
  • [3] Evidence-based health care in Nepal: The importance of systematic reviews
    van Teijlingen, E. R.
    Simkhada, B.
    Ireland, J. C. M.
    Simkhada, P.
    Bruce, J.
    NEPAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 1 (04): : 114 - 118
  • [4] Systematic Review and its Relationship with Evidence-Based Practice in Health
    Urra, Eugenia Medina
    Barria, Rene Mauricio
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2010, 18 (04): : 824 - 831
  • [5] Palliative care clinical trials: how nurses are contributing to integrated, evidence-based care
    Hosie, Annmarie
    Fazekas, Belinda
    Shelby-James, Tania
    Mills, Elaine
    Byfieldt, Naomi
    Margitanovic, Vera
    Hunt, Jane
    Phillips, Jane
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2011, 17 (05) : 224 - 230
  • [7] Development of an Evidence-Based Practice and Research Collaborative Among Urban Hospitals
    Weeks, Susan Mace
    Marshall, June
    Burns, Paulette
    NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 44 (01) : 27 - +
  • [8] Advancing standards for the development of evidence-based health information for consumers Needs and priorities among members of the Network for Evidence-based Medicine
    Buechter, Roland Brian
    Albrecht, Martina
    Grimm, Michael
    Seelig, Markus
    Steckelberg, Anke
    Rahn, Anne Christin
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2024, 187 : 42 - 52
  • [9] From Evidence-Based Medicine to Precision Health: Using Data to Personalize Care
    Bittencourt, Marcio Sommer
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2018, 111 (06) : 762 - 763
  • [10] Development and Implementation of a Model for Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Improvement, and Innovation
    Hagle, Mary
    Dwyer, Darcy
    Gettrust, Lynn
    Lusk, Dana
    Peterson, Kristen
    Tennies, Sherry
    JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2020, 35 (02) : 102 - 107