Impact of critical social empowerment on psychological empowerment and job satisfaction in nursing and midwifery settings

被引:58
|
作者
Casey, Marie [1 ]
Saunders, Jean [2 ]
O'Hara, Teresa [3 ]
机构
[1] HSE Mid W, Limerick, Ireland
[2] Univ Limerick, Dept Math & Stat, Stat Consulting Unit, Limerick, Ireland
[3] Dublin City Univ, Sch Business, Dublin 9, Ireland
关键词
critical social; job satisfaction; psychological and structural empowerment; WORKPLACE; POWER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01040.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Aim To test an expanded model of empowerment which specifies the relationships between structural, psychological, critical social empowerment and job satisfaction. Background There is evidence that structural empowerment predicts psychological empowerment and these two dimensions of empowerment are independent predictors of job satisfaction. This study explored a third dimension of empowerment critical social empowerment - and its impact on psychological empowerment and job satisfaction. Method A predictive, non-experimental design in a sample of 306 nurses and midwives in Ireland using the Conditions of Work Effectiveness Questionnaire, the Psychological Empowerment Questionnaire, a researcher developed tool to measure critical social empowerment and a job satisfaction questionnaire. Results While both structural and critical social empowerment were significant independent predictors of psychological empowerment and job satisfaction, critical social empowerment was the stronger predictor. Conclusions The findings support the inclusion of the critical social dimension of empowerment in the understanding of empowerment. Implications for nursing management Managers at all levels must attend to critical social empowerment as well as structural empowerment in order to increase job satisfaction, retention and engagement of highly qualified committed nurses and midwives.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 34
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Job Stress, Mentoring, Psychological Empowerment, and Job Satisfaction Among Nursing Faculty
    Chung, Catherine E.
    Kowalski, Susan
    JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2012, 51 (07) : 381 - 388
  • [2] The impact of nurse empowerment on job satisfaction
    Ning, Sun
    Zhong, He
    Wang Libo
    Li Qiujie
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2009, 65 (12) : 2642 - 2648
  • [3] Impact of structural and psychological empowerment on job strain in nursing work settings - Expanding Kanter's model
    Laschinger, HKS
    Finegan, J
    Shamian, J
    Wilk, P
    JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2001, 31 (05): : 260 - 272
  • [4] The impact of psychological empowerment and organisational commitment on Chinese nurses' job satisfaction
    Ouyang, Yan-Qiong
    Zhou, Wen-Bin
    Qu, Hui
    CONTEMPORARY NURSE, 2015, 50 (01) : 80 - 91
  • [5] Empowerment and Job Satisfaction
    Guzman Delfino, Camila Paz
    Pontes Macarulla, Paula
    Szuflita, Magdalena
    REIDOCREA-REVISTA EECTRONICA DE INVESTIGACION Y DOCENCIA CREATIVA, 2015, 4 : 66 - 73
  • [6] Psychological Empowerment, Innovative Work Behavior and Job Satisfaction
    Nasir
    Halimatussakdiah
    Suryani, Irma
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACCOUNTING, MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS 2018 (ICAME 2018), 2018, 92 : 636 - 643
  • [7] The effects of psychological empowerment on transformational leadership and job satisfaction
    Fuller, JB
    Morrison, R
    Jones, L
    Bridger, L
    Brown, V
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 139 (03): : 389 - 391
  • [8] Psychological Empowerment and Job Satisfaction An Analysis of Interactive Effects
    Wang, Guangping
    Lee, Peggy D.
    GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT, 2009, 34 (03) : 271 - 296
  • [9] The impact of administrative empowerment on the job satisfaction of employees
    Al Naggar, Samer Ahmed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 9 (07): : 194 - 203
  • [10] The Relation Between Psychological Empowerment, Service Quality, and Job Satisfaction Among Certified Nursing Assistants
    Kostiwa, Irene M.
    Meeks, Suzanne
    CLINICAL GERONTOLOGIST, 2009, 32 (03) : 276 - 292