共 50 条
Alteration of freshwater ecosystem services under global change - A review focusing on the Po River basin (Italy) and the Red River basin (Vietnam)
被引:30
|作者:
Hung Vuong Phama
[1
,2
]
Torresan, Silvia
[1
,2
]
Critto, Andrea
[1
,2
]
Marcomini, Antonio
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Fdn Ctr Euromediterraneo Cambiamenti Climat CMCC, Via Augusto Imperatore 16, I-73100 Lecce, Italy
[2] Univ Ca Foscari Venice, Dept Environm Sci Informat & Stat, Via Torino 155, I-30172 Venice, Italy
关键词:
Climate change;
Human activities;
Ecosystem services framework;
Risk assessment;
LAND-USE CHANGES;
CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACTS;
SEA-LEVEL RISE;
SEDIMENT TRANSPORT;
CHANGE PROJECTIONS;
STORM-SURGE;
EQUILIBRIUM;
RESOLUTION;
DYNAMICS;
MODEL;
D O I:
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.303
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
Freshwater ecosystem services are negatively affected by factors such as climate change (e.g. changes in temperature, precipitation, and sea level rise) and human interventions (e.g. agriculture practices, impoundment of dams, and land use/land cover change). Moreover, the potential synergic impacts of these factors on ecosystems are unevenly distributed, depending on geographical, climatic and socio-economic conditions. The paper aims to review the complex effects of climatic and non-climatic drivers on the supply and demand of freshwater ecosystem services. Based on the literature, we proposed a conceptual framework and a set of indicators for assessing the above-mentioned impacts due to global change, i.e. climate change and human activities. Then, we checked their applicability to the provisioning services of two well-known case studies, namely the Po River basin (Italy) and the Red River basin (Vietnam). To define the framework and the indicators, we selected the most relevant papers and reports; identified the major drivers and the most relevant services; and finally summarized the fundamental effects of these drivers on those services. We concluded that the proposed framework was applicable to the analyzed case studies, but it was not straightforward to consider all the indicators since ecosystem services were not explicitly considered as key assessment endpoints in these areas. Additionally, the supply of ecosystem services was found to draw much more attention than their demand. Finally, we highlighted the importance of defining a common and consistent terminology and classification of drivers, services, and effects to reduce mismatches among ecosystem services when conducting a risk assessment. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1347 / 1365
页数:19
相关论文