Predicting Delirium Risk Using an Automated Mayo Delirium Prediction Tool: Development and Validation of a Risk-Stratification Model

被引:15
|
作者
Pagali, Sandeep R. [1 ,2 ]
Miller, Donna [1 ,2 ]
Fischer, Karen [3 ]
Schroeder, Darrell [3 ]
Egger, Norman [1 ,2 ]
Manning, Dennis M. [1 ,2 ]
Lapid, Maria, I [2 ,4 ]
Pignolo, Robert J. [1 ,2 ]
Burton, M. Caroline [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Hosp Internal Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Geriatr Med & Gerontol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Psychiat & Psychol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PREVENT DELIRIUM; OLDER; INTERVENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.08.049
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop a delirium risk-prediction tool that is applicable across different clinical patient populations and can predict the risk of delirium at admission to hospital. Methods: This retrospective study included 120,764 patients admitted to Mayo Clinic between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017, with age 50 and greater. The study group was randomized into a derivation cohort (n=80,000) and a validation cohort (n=40,764). Different risk factors were extracted and analyzed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) penalized logistic regression. Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for Mayo Delirium Prediction (MDP) tool using derivation cohort was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], .846 to .855). Using the regression coefficients obtained from the derivation cohort, predicted probability of delirium was calculated for each patient in the validation cohort. For the validation cohort, AUROC was 0.84 (95% CI, .834 to .847). Patients were classified into 1 of the 3 risk groups, based on their predicted probability of delirium: low (<5%), moderate (6% to 29%), and high (>_30%). In the derivation cohort, observed incidence of delirium was 1.7%, 12.8%, and 44.8% (low, moderate, and high risk, respectively), which is similar to the incidence rates in the validation cohort of 1.9%, 12.7%, and 46.3%. Conclusion: The Mayo Delirium Prediction tool was developed from a large heterogeneous patient population with good validation results and appears to be a reliable automated tool for delirium risk prediction with hospitalization. Further prospective validation studies are required. ? 2020 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research ? MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS. 2021;96(5):1229-1235
引用
收藏
页码:1229 / 1235
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A PREDICTIVE RISK STRATIFICATION MODEL FOR DELIRIUM AFTER MAJOR UROLOGIC CANCER SURGERIES
    Ha, Albert
    Krasnow, Ross
    Hsieh, Tammy
    Kibel, Adam
    Rudolph, James
    Chung, Benjamin
    Chang, Steven
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E1157 - E1157
  • [42] Development of a risk-stratification scoring system for predicting lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer
    Ni-jia-ti, Ma-yi-di-li
    Ai-hai-ti, Di-li-a-re-mu
    Huo-jia, Ai-si-ka-er-jiang
    Wu-mai-er, Pa-li-dan-mu
    A-bu-li-zi, A-bu-du-ke-you-mu-jiang
    Shi, Yu
    Rou-zi, Nu-er-a-mi-na
    Su, Wen-jing
    Dai, Guo-zhao
    Da-mo-la, Mai-he-mi-ti-jiang
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [43] Refining Indications for Orbital Floor Fracture Reconstruction: A Risk-Stratification Tool Predicting Symptom Development and Need for Surgery
    Basta, Marten N.
    Rao, Vinay
    Roussel, Lauren O.
    Crozier, Joseph W.
    Liu, Paul Y.
    Woo, Albert S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 148 (03) : 606 - 615
  • [44] Development of a risk-stratification scoring system for predicting lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer
    Ma-yi-di-li Ni-jia-ti
    Di-li-a-re-mu Ai-hai-ti
    Ai-si-ka-er-jiang Huo-jia
    Pa-li-dan-mu Wu-mai-er
    A-bu-du-ke-you-mu-jiang A-bu-li-zi
    Yu Shi
    Nu-er-a-mi-na Rou-zi
    Wen-jing Su
    Guo-zhao Dai
    Mai-he-mi-ti-jiang Da-mo-la
    BMC Cancer, 20
  • [45] Transnasal Videoendoscopy for Preoperative Airway Risk Stratification: Development and Validation of a Multivariable Risk Prediction Model
    Barclay-Steuart, Alexander
    Grosshennig, Hanna L.
    Sasu, Phillip
    Wuensch, Viktor A.
    Stadlhofer, Rupert
    Berger, Joanna
    Stark, Maria
    Sehner, Susanne
    Zoellner, Christian
    Petzoldt, Martin
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2023, 136 (06): : 1164 - 1173
  • [46] Predicting Intensive Care Delirium with Machine Learning: Model Development and External Validation
    Gong, Kirby D.
    Lu, Ryan
    Bergamaschi, Teya S.
    Sanyal, Akaash
    Guo, Joanna
    Kim, Han B.
    Nguyen, Hieu T.
    Greenstein, Joseph L.
    Winslow, Raimond L.
    Stevens, Robert D.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 138 (03) : 299 - 311
  • [47] Derivation, Validation, Sustained Performance, and Clinical Impact of an Electronic Medical Record-Based Perioperative Delirium Risk Stratification Tool
    Whitlock, Elizabeth L.
    Braehler, Matthias R.
    Kaplan, Jennifer A.
    Finlayson, Emily
    Rogers, Stephanie E.
    Douglas, Vanja
    Donovan, Anne L.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 131 (06): : 1901 - 1910
  • [48] Benefits of an automated postoperative delirium risk prediction tool combined with non-pharmacological delirium prevention on delirium incidence and length of stay: a before-after analysis based on a quality improvement project
    Dodsworth, Benjamin T.
    Reeve, Kelly A.
    Zozman, Martin
    Meier, Philipp
    Buddeberg, Felix
    Moller, Marius
    Wildhaber, Simone Pascale
    Kedda, Mary-Anne
    Bottger, Sonke
    Stocker, Reto
    Gelsomino, Nayeli Schmutz
    AGE AND AGEING, 2024, 53 (10)
  • [49] Risk factors and prediction of postoperative delirium in elderly hip surgery patients. Implementation and validation of the Inouye risk factor model
    Kalisvaart, K
    Vreeswijk, R
    de Jonghe, J
    van der Ploeg, T
    van Gool, W
    Eikelenboom, P
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2005, 17 : 261 - 261
  • [50] In response to: Letter to the editor: Development of a preoperative risk prediction model for delirium after cardiac surgery
    de la Varga-Martinez, Olga
    Gomez-Sanchez, Esther
    Tamayo, Eduardo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2021, 75