Regular endoscopic surveillance and polypectomy is effective in managing rectal adenoma progression following colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

被引:17
作者
Anele, Chukwuemeka C. [1 ,2 ]
Xiang, Jinpo [3 ]
Martin, Isabel [1 ]
Hawkins, Menna [1 ]
Man, Ripple [1 ]
Clark, Susan K. [1 ]
Faiz, Omar D. [1 ]
Latchford, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] London North West Univ Healthcare NHS Trust, St Marks Hosp, Polyposis Registry, Harrow, Middx, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
[3] Imperial Coll, Dept Med, London, England
关键词
adenoma progression; endoscopic surveillance; FAP; polyposis; rectal cancer; POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS; SECONDARY PROCTECTOMY; RISK-FACTORS; CANCER-RISK; MANAGEMENT; COLON; PREVENTION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1111/codi.15981
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim Total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TC-IRA) is a surgical option for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Regular endoscopic surveillance of the rectum is recommended to prevent rectal cancer. We aimed to document polyp progression in the rectum following TC-IRA and evaluate the role of polypectomy during surveillance. Method Patients with FAP who underwent TC-IRA between 1990 and 2017 were identified. Demographic, endoscopic and genetic data were retrieved. Cumulative rectal adenoma (polyp) counts were obtained, whilst accounting for any polypectomies during the study period. The rate of polyp progression and factors influencing secondary proctectomy were evaluated. Results One hundred and ninety-nine patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria, of which 44% were male. The median age at colectomy was 19 (range 11-70) years and median preoperative rectal polyp count was 7 (range 0-50). All patients had an APC pathogenic variant, of which 151 (79%) were 5' of the mutation cluster region (MCR), 19 (10%) in the MCR, six (3%) were 3' of the MCR and 15 (8%) had a gross deletion. After a median follow-up of 8.6 (range1-27) years and a median of 11 (range 2-37) flexible sigmoidoscopies per patient, the median rate of polyp progression was 5.5 polyps/year (range 0-70.2). There was no evidence of polyp regression. Eight (4%) patients underwent secondary proctectomy for neoplasia, of which one (0.5%) had rectal adenocarcinoma. A total of 13,527 polyps were removed, a median of 35 polyps/patient (range 0-829). The rate of polyp progression was not significantly associated with genotypic or phenotypic factors. Conclusion Progression of rectal adenoma burden following TC-IRA appears to be slow and dependent on the length of follow-up. In the modern era of stringent endoscopic surveillance and therapeutic procedures such as cold snare polypectomy, the rate of secondary proctectomy and the risk of rectal cancer after TC-IRA are very low. These findings are important when counselling patients with regard to the choice of surgery for FAP and implementing endoscopic surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 283
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Meta-analysis of observational studies of ileorectal versus ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis [J].
Aziz, O ;
Athanasiou, T ;
Fazio, VW ;
Nicholls, RJ ;
Darzi, AW ;
Church, J ;
Phillips, RKS ;
Tekkis, PP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (04) :407-417
[2]   Outcome of primary and secondary ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis [J].
Björk, J ;
Åkerbrant, H ;
Iselius, L ;
Svenberg, T ;
Öresland, T ;
Påhlman, L ;
Hultcrantz, R .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (07) :984-992
[3]   Risk factors for rectal cancer morbidity and mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis [J].
Björk, JA ;
Åkerbrant, HI ;
Iselius, LE ;
Hultcrantz, RW .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2000, 43 (12) :1719-1725
[4]   Ileorectal anastomosis is appropriate for a subset of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis [J].
Bülow, C ;
Vasen, H ;
Järvinen, H ;
Björk, J ;
Bisgaard, ML ;
Bülow, S .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 119 (06) :1454-1460
[5]   Colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis is still an option for selected patients with familial adenomatous polyposis [J].
Bulow, Steffen ;
Bulow, Charlotte ;
Vasen, Hans ;
Jarvinen, Heikki ;
Bjork, Jan ;
Christensen, Ib Jarle .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (09) :1318-1323
[6]   A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Prevention Trial of Aspirin and/or Resistant Starch in Young People with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis [J].
Burn, John ;
Bishop, D. Timothy ;
Chapman, Pamela D. ;
Elliott, Faye ;
Bertario, Lucio ;
Dunlop, Malcolm G. ;
Eccles, Diana ;
Ellis, Anthony ;
Evans, D. Gareth ;
Fodde, Riccardo ;
Maher, Eamonn R. ;
Moeslein, Gabriela ;
Vasen, Hans F. A. ;
Coaker, Julie ;
Phillips, Robin K. S. ;
Bulow, Steffen ;
Mathers, John C. .
CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2011, 4 (05) :655-665
[7]   Risk of rectal cancer in patients after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis - A function of available surgical options [J].
Church, J ;
Burke, C ;
McGannon, E ;
Pastean, O ;
Clark, B .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (09) :1175-1181
[8]  
Church J, 2001, DIS COLON RECTUM, V44, P1249, DOI 10.1007/BF02234779
[9]   Colorectal polyp counts and cancer risk in familial adenomatous polyposis [J].
Debinski, HS ;
Love, S ;
Spigelman, AD ;
Phillips, RKS .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 110 (04) :1028-1030
[10]   SPONTANEOUS RESOLUTION OF RECTAL POLYPS IN PATIENTS WITH FAMILIAL POLYPOSIS FOLLOWING ABDOMINAL COLECTOMY AND ILEORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS [J].
FEINBERG, SM ;
JAGELMAN, DG ;
SARRE, RG ;
MCGANNON, E ;
FAZIO, VW ;
LAVERY, IC ;
WEAKLEY, FL ;
EASLEY, KA .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1988, 31 (03) :169-175