Impact of Routine Cavity Shave Margins on Breast Cancer Re-excision Rates

被引:65
作者
Kobbermann, Anne [1 ]
Unzeitig, Alison [1 ]
Xie, Xian-Jin [2 ]
Yan, Jingsheng [2 ]
Euhus, David [1 ]
Peng, Yan [3 ]
Sarode, Venetia [3 ]
Moldrem, Amy [1 ]
Leitch, A. Marilyn [1 ]
Andrews, Valerie [1 ]
Stallings, Carrie [1 ]
Rao, Roshni [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Div Surg Oncol, Dept Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Clin Sci, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[3] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Pathol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
NODE BIOPSY SNOLL; COMPARING TOTAL MASTECTOMY; 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; CONSERVING THERAPY; EUROPEAN-INSTITUTE; LOCALIZATION ROLL; RADIOACTIVE SEED; RESIDUAL DISEASE; LUMPECTOMY; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-010-1420-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is an accepted method of treating early breast cancer. We hypothesized that routine excision of additional cavity shave margins (CSM) at time of initial partial mastectomy reduces the need for additional surgery. A single-institution retrospective review was performed of women, 18 years or older, with a new diagnosis of breast cancer who underwent partial mastectomy between 1 January 2004 and 1 October 2009. Five hundred thirty-three charts were reviewed. Of those, 69 patients underwent CSM at time of initial operation. These 69 patients were matched with patients who had undergone partial mastectomy without CSM by tumor size, presence of extensive intraductal component, and primary histology. The two groups were well matched for age, nuclear grade, associated lymphovascular invasion (LVI), receptor status, and multifocality. We found that 31.9% (44/138) required return to the operating room (OR) for re-excision of margins. Rate of return to the OR was 21.7% (15/69) in the CSM group and 42.0% (29/69) in the matched group (p = 0.011). Multivariate analysis found factors significantly associated with need for additional operation included lack of CSM (odds ratio 9.2, 95% CI 2.8-30.5, p = 0.0003), larger extent of intraductal component (odds ratio 7.0, 95% CI 1.8-27.0, p = 0.005), and lack of directed re-excision (odds ratio 6.4, 95% CI 1.7-25.1, p = 0.007). CSM at time of initial partial mastectomy decreases rate of re-excision by as much as ninefold. CSM should be considered at time of initial operation to reduce the need for subsequent reoperation.
引用
收藏
页码:1349 / 1355
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]   Attaining Negative Margins in Breast-Conservation Operations: Is There a Consensus among Breast Surgeons? [J].
Blair, Sarah L. ;
Thompson, Kari ;
Rococco, Joseph ;
Malcarne, Vanessa ;
Beitsch, Peter D. ;
Ollila, David W. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 209 (05) :608-613
[3]   Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery [J].
Cabioglu, Neslihan ;
Hunt, Kelly K. ;
Sahin, Aysegul A. ;
Kuerer, Henry M. ;
Babiera, Gildy V. ;
Singletary, S. Eva ;
Whitman, Gary J. ;
Ross, Merrick I. ;
Ames, Frederick C. ;
Feig, Barry W. ;
Buchholz, Thomas A. ;
Meric-Bernstam, Funda .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (04) :1458-1471
[4]   Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance [J].
Camp, ER ;
McAuliffe, PF ;
Gilroy, JS ;
Morris, CG ;
Lind, DS ;
Mendenhall, NP ;
Copeland, EM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2005, 201 (06) :855-861
[5]   Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcisions [J].
Cao, DF ;
Lin, C ;
Woo, SH ;
Vang, R ;
Tsangaris, TN ;
Argani, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (12) :1625-1632
[6]   5-YEAR RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING TOTAL MASTECTOMY AND SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY WITH OR WITHOUT RADIATION IN THE TREATMENT OF BREAST-CANCER [J].
FISHER, B ;
BAUER, M ;
MARGOLESE, R ;
POISSON, R ;
PILCH, Y ;
REDMOND, C ;
FISHER, E ;
WOLMARK, N ;
DEUTSCH, M ;
MONTAGUE, E ;
SAFFER, E ;
WICKERHAM, L ;
LERNER, H ;
GLASS, A ;
SHIBATA, H ;
DECKERS, P ;
KETCHAM, A ;
OISHI, R ;
RUSSELL, I .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (11) :665-673
[7]   Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer [J].
Fisher, B ;
Anderson, S ;
Bryant, J ;
Margolese, RG ;
Deutsch, M ;
Fisher, ER ;
Jeong, J ;
Wolmark, N .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (16) :1233-1241
[8]   A Comparison of Ink-Directed and Traditional Whole-Cavity Re-Excision for Breast Lumpectomy Specimens With Positive Margins [J].
Glen R. Gibson ;
Beth-Ann Lesnikoski ;
James Yoo ;
Leila A. Mott ;
Blake Cady ;
Richard J. Barth .
Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2001, 8 (9)
[9]   Radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable breast lesions is better than wire localization [J].
Gray, RJ ;
Pockaj, BA ;
Karstaedt, PJ ;
Roarke, MC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (04) :377-380
[10]  
Gray RJ, 2001, ANN SURG ONCOL, V8, P711