Reliability and structural validity of the Dutch version of Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire in adults with burns

被引:8
|
作者
Willemse, Heidi [1 ,2 ]
Geenen, Rinie [2 ]
Van Loey, Nancy E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Assoc Dutch Burn Ctr, POB 1015, NL-1940 EA Beverwijk, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Clin Psychol, POB 80140, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Stigmatization; Validity; Burn injuries; Depression; Invalidation; Body image; COMFORT QUESTIONNAIRE; FIT INDEXES; INVALIDATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.burns.2020.11.017
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Burn scars can attract attention from others which can be perceived as stigmatizing behavior with negative psychological consequences. The Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire (PSQ) is a validated instrument measuring the perception of stigmatization in burn survivors. The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the PSQ, specifically its factor structure, reliability, and associations with other relevant constructs. Method: Patients (N = 220) completed the PSQ at 3 months after burn. The factor structure was examined with explorative (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analyses at 3 and 12 months after burn, and reliability was examined using Cronbach's alpha. Three months measurements were used to examine associations of the PSQ with 'depressive mood' (Beck Depression Inventory, BDI-II), 'interpersonal relations' and 'body image' (Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief, BSHS-B), and two scales of the Illness Invalidation Inventory (3*I). Results: A four factor model showed the best fit to the data. Two factors, 'confused/staring behavior' and 'hostile behavior', were identical to the original PSQ. The third original factor, 'absence of friendly behavior', was now divided into two factors separating absence of friendly behavior of strangers and other people. Internal consistency ranged from .60 to .88. Especially the 'confused/staring behavior' factor was related to the other questionnaire scores. Conclusion: The current study shows acceptable reliability and structural validity of the Dutch version of the PSQ in a 4-factor solution. Further research into measurement invariance across languages is recommended to establish a uniform multicultural instrument. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1381 / 1388
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validity and reliability of Persian version of Low Physical Activity Questionnaire (LoPAQ)
    Tabibi, Mohammad Ali
    Samouei, Rahele
    Salimian, Nasrin
    Shahidi, Shahrzad
    Atapour, Abdolamir
    Nazemi, Farzad
    Ghenaat, Mahsa
    Nikbakht, Saghar
    Sarbazi, Mahboobeh Hoseini
    Soleymany, Mahsa
    Roshanaeian, Zahra
    Khajeheian, Behnaz
    Khaki, Zahra
    Sokani, Ali Sadeghi
    Ebrahimi, Reyhane
    Ahmadi, Saghar
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [22] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the mental vulnerability questionnaire for the undergraduate students
    Gong, Yuxin
    Liu, Kun
    Hu, Na
    Sun, Mengyuan
    Huang, Mina
    PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHIATRIC CARE, 2020, 56 (02) : 409 - 414
  • [23] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of caregiver self-assessment questionnaire
    Askin, Ayhan
    Atar, Emel
    Sengul, Ilker
    Tosun, Aliye
    Demirdal, Umit
    Elmali, Ferhan
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 42 (22) : 3250 - 3255
  • [24] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire
    Duruoz, Mehmet Tuncay
    Toprak, Canan Sanal
    Ulutatar, Firat
    Suhaimi, Anwar
    Agirbasli, Mehmet
    TURK KARDIYOLOJI DERNEGI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 48 (08): : 731 - 738
  • [25] Reliability and validity of Leicester Cough Questionnaire Korean version
    Han, Jong-Min
    Jung, In-Chul
    Kang, Weechang
    Kim, Seung-Su
    Yeo, Yoon
    Park, Yang-Chun
    CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2014, 11 (03) : 147 - 152
  • [26] Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Pain Disability Questionnaire
    Yoon, Jisun
    Choi, Kyoung Hyo
    Kim, Tae Woo
    Yang, Seo Yon
    Sim, Mi Kyung
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2013, 37 (06): : 814 - 823
  • [27] Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire
    Lin, Chuan-Ju
    Shiah, I-Shin
    Chu, Hsin
    Tsai, Pei-Shan
    Chen, Chiung-Hua
    Chang, Yue-Cune
    Chou, Kuei-Ru
    ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, 2011, 25 (01) : 53 - 62
  • [28] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Parenting Concerns Questionnaire
    Yanai, Misa
    Aoyama, Maho
    Kosugi, Kazuhiro
    Tsumura, Akemi
    Nakanishi, Erika
    Miyashita, Mitsunori
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 54 (07) : 797 - 804
  • [29] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
    S. Sarmer
    S. Ergin
    G. Yavuzer
    Rheumatology International, 2000, 20 : 9 - 12
  • [30] Reliability and validity of the Swedish version of Child Health Questionnaire
    Norrby, U
    Nordholm, L
    Fasth, A
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 32 (02) : 101 - 107