Reliability and structural validity of the Dutch version of Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire in adults with burns

被引:8
|
作者
Willemse, Heidi [1 ,2 ]
Geenen, Rinie [2 ]
Van Loey, Nancy E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Assoc Dutch Burn Ctr, POB 1015, NL-1940 EA Beverwijk, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Clin Psychol, POB 80140, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Stigmatization; Validity; Burn injuries; Depression; Invalidation; Body image; COMFORT QUESTIONNAIRE; FIT INDEXES; INVALIDATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.burns.2020.11.017
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Burn scars can attract attention from others which can be perceived as stigmatizing behavior with negative psychological consequences. The Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire (PSQ) is a validated instrument measuring the perception of stigmatization in burn survivors. The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the PSQ, specifically its factor structure, reliability, and associations with other relevant constructs. Method: Patients (N = 220) completed the PSQ at 3 months after burn. The factor structure was examined with explorative (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analyses at 3 and 12 months after burn, and reliability was examined using Cronbach's alpha. Three months measurements were used to examine associations of the PSQ with 'depressive mood' (Beck Depression Inventory, BDI-II), 'interpersonal relations' and 'body image' (Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief, BSHS-B), and two scales of the Illness Invalidation Inventory (3*I). Results: A four factor model showed the best fit to the data. Two factors, 'confused/staring behavior' and 'hostile behavior', were identical to the original PSQ. The third original factor, 'absence of friendly behavior', was now divided into two factors separating absence of friendly behavior of strangers and other people. Internal consistency ranged from .60 to .88. Especially the 'confused/staring behavior' factor was related to the other questionnaire scores. Conclusion: The current study shows acceptable reliability and structural validity of the Dutch version of the PSQ in a 4-factor solution. Further research into measurement invariance across languages is recommended to establish a uniform multicultural instrument. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1381 / 1388
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of the German version of the Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire/Social Comfort Questionnaire in adult burn survivors
    Mueller, Astrid
    Smits, Dirk
    Claes, Laurence
    Jasper, Stefanie
    Berg, Lea
    Ipaktchi, Ramin
    Vogt, Peter M.
    de Zwaan, Martina
    BURNS, 2016, 42 (04) : 790 - 796
  • [2] Reliability and validity of Chinese version of perceived deficits questionnaire for depression in patients with MDD
    Shi, Chuan
    Wang, Gang
    Tian, Feng
    Han, Xiaolei
    Sha, Sha
    Xing, Xiaomeng
    Yu, Xin
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2017, 252 : 319 - 324
  • [3] The reliability and validity of the perceived stigmatization questionnaire (PSQ) and the social comfort questionnaire (SCQ) among an adult burn survivor sample
    Lawrence, JW
    Fauerbach, JA
    Heinberg, LJ
    Doctor, M
    Thombs, BD
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2006, 18 (01) : 106 - 111
  • [4] Validity and Reliability of a French Version of the Metacognitions Questionnaire in a Nonclinical Population
    Laro, Frank
    Van der Linden, Martial
    d'Acremont, Mathieu
    SWISS JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 68 (03): : 125 - 132
  • [5] Reliability and Validity of the Latvian Version of the Emotion Regulation Skills Questionnaire
    Kristina-Everte, Iluta
    Paica, Inese
    Martinsone, Kristine
    SOCIETY, INTEGRATION, EDUCATION 2021, VOL VII: PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, : 146 - 158
  • [6] The online version of the Dutch Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Factor structure, predictive validity and reliability
    Verkuil, Bart
    Brosschot, Jos F.
    JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2012, 26 (08) : 844 - 848
  • [7] The Psychometric Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Existential Loneliness Questionnaire
    Gokdemir-Bulut, B. P.
    Bozo, Ozlem
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 37 (01) : 401 - 413
  • [8] Reliability and validity of the abbreviated version of the Mindful Eating Questionnaire in Turkish adults
    Kaya, Seda
    Acik, Murat
    Coskun, Ayfer Beyaz
    Yilmaz, Feray Cagiran
    REVISTA DE NUTRICAO-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2024, 37
  • [9] Validity and reliability of the Sinhalese version of the perceived stress scale questionnaire among Sri Lankans
    Mendis, Balapuwaduge Isuru Layan Madusanka
    Palihaderu, Palihaderu Arachchige Dineth Supasan
    Karunanayake, Panduka
    Satharasinghe, Dilan Amila
    Krishanthi, Jayasekara Mudiyanselage
    Premarathne, Jayasekara Mudiyanselage Krishanthi Jayarukshi Kumari
    Dias, Wajjakkara Kankanamlage Ruwin Rangeeth
    Rajapakse, Iyanthimala Harshini
    Hapugalle, Avanti Sulochana
    Karunaratne, Wanasinghe Ranhettige Sasanka Anjalee
    Binendra, Agulugaha Gamage Yohan Nipuna
    Kumara, Kelaniya Bandaralage Pubudu Pradeep
    Prabhashwara, Galathura Samanabaddage Dasun
    Senarath, Upul
    Yeap, Swee Keong
    Ho, Wan Yong
    Dissanayake, Arosha Sampath
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [10] The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Italian version
    Calugi, Simona
    Milanese, Chiara
    Sartirana, Massimiliano
    El Ghoch, Marwan
    Sartori, Federica
    Geccherle, Eleonora
    Coppini, Andrea
    Franchini, Cecilia
    Dalle Grave, Riccardo
    EATING AND WEIGHT DISORDERS-STUDIES ON ANOREXIA BULIMIA AND OBESITY, 2017, 22 (03) : 509 - 514