Coping with drought in rice farming in Asia: insights from a cross-country comparative study

被引:48
作者
Pandey, Sushil [1 ]
Bhandari, Humnath [2 ]
Ding, Shijun [3 ]
Prapertchob, Preeda [4 ]
Sharan, Ramesh [5 ]
Naik, Dibakar [6 ]
Taunk, Sudhir K. [7 ]
Sastri, Asras [7 ]
机构
[1] IRRI, Soc Sci Div, Los Banos, Philippines
[2] Int Res Ctr Agr Sci JIRCAS, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058686, Japan
[3] Zhongshan Univ Econ & Law, Wuhan 430073, Hubei Province, Peoples R China
[4] Khon Kaen Univ, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
[5] Ranchi Univ, Dept Econ, Ranchi, Bihar, India
[6] Orissa Univ Agr & Technol, Bhubaneswar 751003, Orissa, India
[7] Indira Gandhi Agr Univ, Raipur, Madhya Pradesh, India
关键词
drought; economic cost; coping mechanisms; poverty;
D O I
10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00246.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Drought is a major constraint affecting rice production, especially in rainfed areas of Asia. Despite its importance in rice-growing areas, the magnitude of economic losses arising from drought, its impact on farm households, and farmers' drought coping mechanisms are poorly understood. This article provides insights into these aspects of drought based on a cross-country comparative analysis of rainfed rice-growing areas in southern China, eastern India, and northeast Thailand. The economic cost of drought is found to be substantially higher in eastern India than in the other two countries. Higher probability and greater spatial covariance of drought and less diversified farming systems with rice accounting for a larger share of household income are the main reasons for this higher cost of drought in eastern India. Farmers deploy various coping mechanisms but such mechanisms are largely unable to prevent a reduction in income and consumption, especially in eastern India. As a result, welfare consequences on poor farmers are substantial with a large number of people falling back into poverty during drought years. The overall implications for technology design and for policy improvements for drought mitigation and drought relief are discussed in the light of the empirical findings of the study.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 224
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
ABEDULLAH, 1998, PHILIPPINE J CROP SC, V23, P159
[2]  
ANDERSO NJR, 1995, FRAGILE LIVES FRAGIL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, INT FOOD POLICY RES
[4]  
[Anonymous], INTENSIVE USE GROUND
[5]   ECONOMETRIC ESTIMATION OF PRODUCERS RISK ATTITUDES [J].
ANTLE, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1987, 69 (03) :509-522
[6]   Developing rice cultivars for high-fertility upland systems in the Asian tropics [J].
Atlin, GN ;
Lafitte, HR ;
Tao, D ;
Laza, A ;
Amante, A ;
Courtois, B .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2006, 97 (01) :43-52
[7]  
*BANK THAI, 2005, INFL REP JAN 2005
[8]   Rural poverty dynamics: development policy implications [J].
Barrett, Christopher B. .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 32 :45-60
[9]  
BENNETT J, 1995, GEOJOURNAL, V35, P335
[10]   Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential - are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? [J].
Blum, A .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2005, 56 (11) :1159-1168