Drought priming induces chilling tolerance and improves reproductive functioning in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

被引:7
|
作者
Saini, Rashmi [1 ]
Das, Rangman [2 ]
Adhikary, Arindam [1 ]
Kumar, Rashpal [1 ]
Singh, Inderjit [3 ]
Nayyar, Harsh [4 ]
Kumar, Sanjeev [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent Univ Punjab, Ctr Biosci, Sch Basic & Appl Sci, Bathinda 151401, India
[2] Cent Univ Punjab, Sch Biol Sci, Dept Bot, Bathinda 151401, India
[3] Punjab Agr Univ, Dept Plant Breeding & Genet, Ludhiana 141004, Punjab, India
[4] Panjab Univ, Dept Bot, Chandigarh 160014, India
关键词
Chickpea; Chilling stress; Drought priming; Reproductive stage; Yield; TEMPERATURE-STRESS; FREEZING TOLERANCE; PHENOLIC-COMPOUNDS; COLD-ACCLIMATION; ABSCISIC-ACID; CHLOROPHYLL; RESPONSES; PROLINE; PLANTS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00299-022-02905-7
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Key message Priming alleviates membrane damage, chlorophyll degradation along with cryoprotectants accumulation during chilling stress that leads to improved reproductive functioning and increased seed yield. Chilling temperatures below 15 degrees C have severe implications on the reproductive growth and development of chickpea. The abnormal reproductive development and subsequent reproductive failure lead to substantial yield loss. We exposed five chickpea cultivars (PBG1, GPF2, PDG3, PDG4, and PBG5) to drought stress (Priming) during the vegetative stage and analyzed for chilling tolerance during the reproductive stage. These varieties were raised in the fields in two sets: one set of plants were subjected to drought stress at the vegetative stage for 30 days (priming) and the second set of plants were irrigated regularly (non-primed). The leaf samples were harvested at the flowering, podding, and seed filling stage and analyzed for membrane damage, water status, chlorophyll content, cellular respiration, and certain cryoprotective solutes. The reproductive development was analyzed by accessing pollen viability, in vivo and in vitro germination, pollen load, and in vivo pollen tube growth. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that priming improved membrane damage, chlorophyll b degradation, and accumulation of cryoprotectants in GPF2, PDG3, and PBG5 at the flowering stage (< 15 degrees C). Pearson's correlation analysis showed a negative correlation with the accumulation of proline and carbohydrates with flower, pod, and seed abortion. Only, PBG5 responded best to priming while PBG1 was worst. In PBG5, priming resulted in reduced membrane damage and lipid peroxidation, improved water content, reduced chlorophyll degradation, and enhanced cryoprotective solutes accumulation, which led to increased reproductive functioning and finally improved seed yield and harvest index. Lastly, the priming response is variable and cultivar-specific but overall improve plant tolerance.
引用
收藏
页码:2005 / 2022
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Drought priming induces chilling tolerance and improves reproductive functioning in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Rashmi Saini
    Rangman Das
    Arindam Adhikary
    Rashpal Kumar
    Inderjit Singh
    Harsh Nayyar
    Sanjeev Kumar
    Plant Cell Reports, 2022, 41 : 2005 - 2022
  • [2] Drought priming triggers diverse metabolic adjustments and induces chilling tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Saini, Rashmi
    Adhikary, Arindam
    Juneja, Sumandeep
    Kumar, Rashpal
    Singh, Inderjit
    Nayyar, Harsh
    Kumar, Sanjeev
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2023, 194 : 418 - 439
  • [3] Genetic dissection of drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Varshney, Rajeev K.
    Thudi, Mahendar
    Nayak, Spurthi N.
    Gaur, Pooran M.
    Kashiwagi, Junichi
    Krishnamurthy, Lakshmanan
    Jaganathan, Deepa
    Koppolu, Jahnavi
    Bohra, Abhishek
    Tripathi, Shailesh
    Rathore, Abhishek
    Jukanti, Aravind K.
    Jayalakshmi, Veera
    Vemula, Anilkumar
    Singh, S. J.
    Yasin, Mohammad
    Sheshshayee, M. S.
    Viswanatha, K. P.
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2014, 127 (02) : 445 - 462
  • [4] Genetic dissection of drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Rajeev K. Varshney
    Mahendar Thudi
    Spurthi N. Nayak
    Pooran M. Gaur
    Junichi Kashiwagi
    Lakshmanan Krishnamurthy
    Deepa Jaganathan
    Jahnavi Koppolu
    Abhishek Bohra
    Shailesh Tripathi
    Abhishek Rathore
    Aravind K. Jukanti
    Veera Jayalakshmi
    Anilkumar Vemula
    S. J. Singh
    Mohammad Yasin
    M. S. Sheshshayee
    K. P. Viswanatha
    Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2014, 127 : 445 - 462
  • [5] Breeding for improved drought tolerance in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Maqbool, Muhammad Amir
    Aslam, Muhammad
    Ali, Hina
    PLANT BREEDING, 2017, 136 (03) : 300 - 318
  • [6] Assessment of Iranian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasms for drought tolerance
    Ganjeali, Ali
    Porsa, Hassan
    Bagheri, Abdolreza
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2011, 98 (09) : 1477 - 1484
  • [7] Genetic mapping of QTLs for drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Kushwah, Ashutosh
    Bhatia, Dharminder
    Barmukh, Rutwik
    Singh, Inderjit
    Singh, Gurpreet
    Bindra, Shayla
    Vij, Suruchi
    Chellapilla, Bharadwaj
    Pratap, Aditya
    Roorkiwal, Manish
    Kumar, Shiv
    Varshney, Rajeev K.
    Singh, Sarvjeet
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 13
  • [8] Sources of tolerance to terminal drought in the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) minicore germplasm
    Krishnamurthy, L.
    Kashiwagi, J.
    Gaur, P. M.
    Upadhyaya, H. D.
    Vadez, V.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2010, 119 (2-3) : 322 - 330
  • [9] Shoot traits and their relevance in terminal drought tolerance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Purushothaman, Ramamoorthy
    Krishnamurthy, Lakshmanan
    Upadhyaya, Hari Deo
    Vadez, Vincent
    Varshney, Rajeev Kumar
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2016, 197 : 10 - 27
  • [10] Involvement of proline in response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to chilling stress at reproductive stage
    Kaur, Gurinder
    Kumar, Sanjeev
    Thakur, Prince
    Malik, Jahid A.
    Bhandhari, Kalpna
    Sharma, K. D.
    Nayyar, Harsh
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2011, 128 (03) : 174 - 181