The effect of environmental regulation on green total-factor productivity in China's industry

被引:118
作者
Cheng, Zhonghua [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kong, Shiyu [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, China Inst Mfg Dev, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Reading Acad, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental regulation; Green total factor productivity (GTFP); Command-and-control environmental regulation (CCR); Market-based environmental regulation (MBR); Dynamic spatial panel; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; HETEROGENEOUS INFLUENCE; EMISSION PERFORMANCE; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; DISTANCE FUNCTION; EFFICIENCY; GROWTH; INNOVATION; SECTOR; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106757
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Employing both the meta-frontier and the non-radial directional distance function methods, we estimate the industrial GTFP and its decomposition from 2000 to 2019 in 30 Chinese provinces. Following this, a dynamic spatial panel model is employed to test the effects of the policy, the mechanisms of action and the channels of two sorts of environmental regulations on GTFP. The results show that, compared with a single policy, a combination of policies is more conducive to GTFP growth. Further analyses of the mechanisms indicate that command-and control (management) environmental regulations will boost the expansion of GTFP. This is mainly achieved by improving technical efficiency and narrowing the technical gap. Market-based environmental regulations can also accelerate the growth of GTFP, principally through improvements in the advancement of technology and a narrowing of the technological gap Increased GTFP growth can be achieved via these three effects by using a policy mix.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Cohen, Mark A. ;
Elgie, Stewart ;
Lanoie, Paul .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) :2-22
[2]   Local environmental regulation and plant-level productivity [J].
Becker, Randy A. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (12) :2516-2522
[3]   Environmental regulation and productivity: Evidence from oil refineries [J].
Berman, E ;
Bui, LTM .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2001, 83 (03) :498-510
[4]  
Brannlund R., 2008, Umea Economic Studies, V27, P1626
[5]   Testing the Porter hypothesis: the effects of environmental investments on efficiency in Swedish industry [J].
Broberg, Thomas ;
Marklund, Per-Olov ;
Samakovlis, Eva ;
Hammar, Henrik .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2013, 40 (01) :43-56
[6]   Effects of coercive regulation versus voluntary and cooperative auto-regulation on environmental adaptation and performance: Empirical evidence in Spain [J].
Camison, Cesar .
EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 28 (05) :346-361
[7]   Does environmental regulation indirectly induce upstream innovation? New evidence from India [J].
Chakraborty, Pavel ;
Chatterjee, Chirantan .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (05) :939-955
[8]   Research on meta-frontier total-factor energy efficiency and its spatial convergence in Chinese provinces [J].
Cheng, Zhonghua ;
Liu, Jun ;
Li, Lianshui ;
Gu, Xinbei .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 86
[9]   Total-factor carbon emission efficiency of China's provincial industrial sector and its dynamic evolution [J].
Cheng, Zhonghua ;
Li, Lianshui ;
Liu, Jun ;
Zhang, Huiming .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 94 :330-339
[10]   The emissions reduction effect and technical progress effect of environmental regulation policy tools [J].
Cheng, Zhonghua ;
Li, Lianshui ;
Liu, Jun .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 149 :191-205