Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Propofol in Children

被引:54
作者
Rigouzzo, Agnes [1 ]
Servin, Frederique [2 ]
Constant, Isabelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 06, Dept Anesthesiol, Armand Trousseau Hosp, AP HP, F-75571 Paris 12, France
[2] Hop Xavier Bichat, Dept Anesthesiol, AP HP, Paris, France
关键词
EFFECT SITE EQUILIBRATION; BISPECTRAL INDEX; CONTROLLED INFUSION; ANESTHESIA; TIME; TARGET; SEVOFLURANE; SURGERY; PLASMA; BOLUS;
D O I
10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181e4f4ca
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to identify the best model to describe pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in prepubertal children and therefore to calculate the corresponding pharmacodynamic parameters. In addition, and to confirm our method, a group of postpubertal subjects was also studied. Methods: Sixteen children (9.5 yr, range 6-12) and 13 adults (22 yr, range 13-35) were included. Induction was performed by plasma target-controlled infusion of propofol (6 mu g/ml) based on the Kataria model in children and on the Schnider model in adults. The relationship of bispectral index to predicted concentrations was studied during induction using the Kataria, pediatric Marsh, Schuttler, and Schnider models in children. Because the best performance was obtained, strangely enough, with the Schnider model, the two groups were pooled to investigate influence of puberty on pharmacodynamic parameters (kE(0) [plasma effect-site equilibration rate constant] and Ce-50 [effect-site concentration corresponding with 50% of the maximal effect]). The time-to-peak effect was calculated, and the kE(0) was determined for the Kataria model (nonlinear mixed-effects modeling; pkpdtools). Results: In children, the predicted concentration/effect relationship was best described using the Schnider model. When the whole population was considered, a significant improvement in this model was obtained using puberty as a covariate for kE(0) and Ce-50. The time to peak effect, T-peak (median, 0.71 [range, 0.37-1.64] and 1.73 [1.4-2.68] min), and the Ce-50 (3.71 [1.88-4.4] and 3.07 [2.95-5.21] mu g/ml) were shorter and higher, respectively, in children than in adults. The kE(0) linked to the Kataria model was 4.6 [1.4-11] min. Conclusions: In children, the predicted concentration/effect relationships were best described using the Schnider model described for adults compared with classic pediatric models. The study suggests that the Schnider model might be useful for propofol target-control infusion in children.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 352
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Muñoz HR, 2004, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V101, P1269
  • [22] Target-controlled versus manually-controlled infusion of propofol for direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy
    Passot, S
    Servin, F
    Allary, R
    Pascal, J
    Prades, JM
    Auboyer, C
    Molliex, S
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (05) : 1212 - 1216
  • [23] Time delay of index calculation - Analysis of cerebral state, bispectral, and narcotrend indices
    Pilge, S
    Zanner, P
    Schneider, G
    Blum, J
    Kreuzer, M
    Kochs, EF
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 104 (03) : 488 - 494
  • [24] The relationship between bispectral index and propofol during target-controlled infusion anesthesia: A comparative study between children and young adults
    Rigouzzo, Agnes
    Girault, Laure
    Louvet, Nicolas
    Servin, Frederique
    De-Smet, Tom
    Piat, Veronique
    Seeman, Robert
    Murat, Isabelle
    Constant, Isabelle
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 106 (04) : 1109 - 1116
  • [25] The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers
    Schnider, TW
    Minto, CF
    Gambus, PL
    Andresen, C
    Goodale, DB
    Shafer, SL
    Youngs, EJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 88 (05) : 1170 - 1182
  • [26] The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics
    Schnider, TW
    Minto, CF
    Shafer, SL
    Gambus, PL
    Andresen, C
    Goodale, DB
    Youngs, EJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (06) : 1502 - 1516
  • [27] Population pharmacokinetics of propofol:: A multicenter study
    Schüttler, J
    Ihmsen, H
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 92 (03) : 727 - 738
  • [28] Pharmacokinetics of a single bolus of propofol in Chinese children of different ages
    ShangGuan, WN
    Lian, QQ
    Aarons, L
    Matthews, I
    Wang, ZS
    Chen, XL
    Freemantle, N
    Smith, FG
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 104 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [29] Influence of administration rate on propofol plasma - Effect site equilibration
    Struys, Michel M. R. F.
    Coppens, Marc J.
    De Neve, Nikolaas
    Mortier, Eric P.
    Doufas, Anthony G.
    Van Bocxlaer, Jan F. P.
    Shafer, Steven L.
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2007, 107 (03) : 386 - 396
  • [30] Comparison of closed-loop controlled administration of propofol using bispectral index as the controlled variable versus "standard practice" controlled administration
    Struys, MMRF
    De Smet, T
    Versichelen, LFM
    Van de Velde, S
    Van den Broecke, R
    Mortier, EP
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 95 (01) : 6 - 17