共 50 条
A mindfulness-based intervention to increase resilience to stress in university students (the Mindful Student Study): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
被引:281
|作者:
Galante, Julieta
[1
,4
]
Dufour, Geraldine
[2
,5
]
Vainre, Maris
[4
]
Wagner, Adam P.
[4
,6
]
Stochl, Jan
[1
,4
]
Benton, Alice
[3
]
Lathia, Neal
[7
]
Howarth, Emma
[4
]
Jones, Peter B.
[1
,4
]
机构:
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychiat, Douglas House, Cambridge CB2 8AH, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Univ Counselling Serv, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Educ & Student Policy, Acad Div, Cambridge, England
[4] Natl Inst Hlth Res Collaborat Leadership Appl Hlt, Cambridge, England
[5] British Assoc Counselling & Psychotherapy Univ &, Lutterworth, Leics, England
[6] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Med Sch, Norwich Res Pk, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[7] UCL, Dept Comp Sci, London, England
来源:
LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH
|
2018年
/
3卷
/
02期
关键词:
MENTAL-HEALTH;
METAANALYSIS;
PERFORMANCE;
MEDITATION;
COLLEGE;
D O I:
10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30231-1
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
Background The rising number of young people going to university has led to concerns about an increasing demand for student mental health services. We aimed to assess whether provision of mindfulness courses to university students would improve their resilience to stress. Methods We did this pragmatic randomised controlled trial at the University of Cambridge, UK. Students aged 18 years or older with no severe mental illness or crisis (self-assessed) were randomly assigned (1:1), via remote survey software using computer-generated random numbers, to receive either an 8 week mindfulness course adapted for university students (Mindfulness Skills for Students [MSS]) plus mental health support as usual, or mental health support as usual alone. Participants and the study management team were aware of group allocation, but allocation was concealed from the researchers, outcome assessors, and study statistician. The primary outcome was selfreported psychological distress during the examination period, as measured with the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM), with higher scores indicating more distress. The primary analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12615001160527. Findings Between Sept 28, 2015, and Jan 15, 2016, we randomly assigned 616 students to the MSS group (n=309) or the support as usual group (n=307). 453 (74%) participants completed the CORE-OM during the examination period and 182 (59%) MSS participants completed at least half of the course. MSS reduced distress scores during the examination period compared with support as usual, with mean CORE-OM scores of 0.87 (SD 0.50) in 237 MSS participants versus 1.11 (0 . 57) in 216 support as usual participants (adjusted mean difference - 0.14, 95% CI - 0.22 to - 0.06; p=0.001), showing a moderate effect size (beta -0.44, 95% CI - 0.60 to - 0.29; p<0.0001). 123 (57%) of 214 participants in the support as usual group had distress scores above an accepted clinical threshold compared with 88 (37%) of 235 participants in the MSS group. On average, six students (95% CI four to ten) needed to be offered the MSS course to prevent one from experiencing clinical levels of distress. No participants had adverse reactions related to self-harm, suicidality, or harm to others. Interpretation Our findings show that provision of mindfulness training could be an effective component of a wider student mental health strategy. Further comparative effectiveness research with inclusion of controls for non-specific effects is needed to define a range of additional, effective interventions to increase resilience to stress in university students. Copyright (C) The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
引用
收藏
页码:E72 / E81
页数:10
相关论文