Tracheal Intubation during Advanced Life Support Using Direct Laryngoscopy versus Glidescope® Videolaryngoscopy by Clinicians with Limited Intubation Experience: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:4
作者
van Schuppen, Hans [1 ]
Wojciechowicz, Kamil [1 ]
Hollmann, Markus W. [1 ]
Preckel, Benedikt [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Locat, Dept Anesthesiol, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
airway management; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; advanced life support; emergency medical service; tracheal intubation; videolaryngoscopy; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE; AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL-STUDENTS; CARDIAC-ARREST; PERFORMANCE; MANNEQUIN; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11216291
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The use of the Glidescope (R) videolaryngoscope might improve tracheal intubation performance in clinicians with limited intubation experience, especially during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare direct laryngoscopy to Glidescope (R) videolaryngoscopy by these clinicians. PubMed/Medline and Embase were searched from their inception to 7 July 2020 for randomized controlled trials, including simulation studies. Studies on adult patients or adult-sized manikins were included when direct laryngoscopy was compared to Glidescope (R) videolaryngoscopy by clinicians with limited experience in tracheal intubation (<10 intubations per year). The primary outcome was the intubation first-pass success rate. Secondary outcomes were time to successful intubation and chest compression interruption duration during intubation. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). We included 4 clinical trials with 525 patients and 20 manikin trials with 2547 intubations. Meta-analyses favored Glidescope (R) videolaryngoscopy over direct laryngoscopy regarding first-pass success (clinical trials: risk ratio [RR] = 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-2.23; manikin trials: RR = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.09-1.25). Clinical trials showed a shorter time to achieve successful intubation when using the Glidescope (R) (mean difference = 17.04 s; 95% CI: 8.51-25.57 s). Chest compression interruption duration was decreased when using the Glidescope (R) videolaryngoscope. The certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. When clinicians with limited intubation experience have to perform tracheal intubation during advanced life support, the use of the Glidescope (R) videolaryngoscope improves intubation and CPR performance compared to direct laryngoscopy.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Difficult Airway Management for Novice Physicians A Randomized Trial Comparing Direct and Video-Assisted Laryngoscopy [J].
Ambrosio, Art ;
Pfannenstiel, Travis ;
Bach, Kevin ;
Cornelissen, Chris ;
Gaconnet, Cory ;
Brigger, Matthew T. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2014, 150 (05) :775-778
[2]   Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for emergency orotracheal intubation outside the operating room: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Arulkumaran, N. ;
Lowe, J. ;
Ions, R. ;
Mendoza, M. ;
Bennett, V. ;
Dunser, M. W. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 120 (04) :712-724
[3]   Tracheal intubation following training with the GlideScope® compared to direct laryngoscopy [J].
Ayoub, C. M. ;
Kanazi, G. E. ;
Al Alami, A. ;
Rameh, C. ;
El-Khatib, M. F. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 65 (07) :674-678
[4]   Learning and performance of endotracheal intubation by paramedical students: Comparison of GlideScope (R) and intubating laryngeal mask airway with direct laryngoscopy in manikins [J].
Bahathiq, Adil Omar ;
Abdelmontaleb, Tharwat Helmy ;
Newigy, Mohammed Khairt .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 60 (05) :337-342
[5]   Effect of a Strategy of a Supraglottic Airway Device vs Tracheal Intubation During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest on Functional Outcome The AIRWAYS-2 Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Benger, Jonathan R. ;
Kirby, Kim ;
Black, Sarah ;
Brett, Stephen J. ;
Clout, Madeleine ;
Lazaroo, Michelle J. ;
Nolan, Jerry P. ;
Reeves, Barnaby C. ;
Robinson, Maria ;
Scott, Lauren J. ;
Smartt, Helena ;
South, Adrian ;
Stokes, Elizabeth A. ;
Taylor, Jodi ;
Thomas, Matthew ;
Voss, Sarah ;
Wordsworth, Sarah ;
Rogers, Chris A. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 320 (08) :779-791
[6]  
Biermann H, 2013, NETH J CRIT CARE, V17, P7
[7]   Defining the learning curve for endotracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy: A systematic review [J].
Buis, Maria L. ;
Maissan, Iscander M. ;
Hoeks, Sanne E. ;
Klimek, Markus ;
Stolker, Robert J. .
RESUSCITATION, 2016, 99 :63-71
[8]   Preventing unrecognised oesophageal intubation: a consensus guideline from the Project for Universal Management of Airways and international airway societies [J].
Chrimes, N. ;
Higgs, A. ;
Hagberg, C. A. ;
Baker, P. A. ;
Cooper, R. M. ;
Greif, R. ;
Kovacs, G. ;
Law, J. A. ;
Marshall, S. D. ;
Myatra, S. N. ;
O'Sullivan, E. P. ;
Rosenblatt, W. H. ;
Ross, C. H. ;
Sakles, J. C. ;
Sorbello, M. ;
Cook, T. M. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 77 (12) :1395-1415
[9]   Comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscope and intubating laryngeal mask airway with direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation [J].
Cinar, Orhan ;
Cevik, Erdem ;
Yildirim, Ali Osman ;
Yasar, Mehmet ;
Kilic, Erden ;
Comert, Bilgin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 18 (02) :117-120
[10]   The success of pre-hospital tracheal intubation by different pre-hospital providers: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis [J].
Crewdson, K. ;
Lockey, D. J. ;
Roislien, J. ;
Lossius, H. M. ;
Rehn, M. .
CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 21