Response Systems: The Syntax and Semantics of Fragment Answers and Response Particles

被引:2
作者
Teresa Espinal, M. [1 ]
Tubau, Susagna [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Filol Catalana, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Filol Anglesa & Germanist, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF LINGUISTICS, VOL 5 | 2019年 / 5卷
关键词
answers; fragments; response particles; syntax; semantics; POLAR QUESTIONS; DISCOURSE; PROSODY;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-012613
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This article critically reviews the main research issues raised in the study of response systems in natural languages by addressing the syntax and semantics of fragment answers and yes/ no response particles. Fragment answers include replies that do not have a sentential form, whereas response particles consist solely of an affirmative or a negative adverb. While the main research question in the syntax of fragments and response particles has been whether these contain more syntactic structure than what is actually pronounced, the key issues in the study of their semantics are question-answer congruence, the anaphoric potential of response particles, and the meaning of fragments in relation to positive and negative questions. In connection to these issues, this review suggests some interesting avenues for further research: (a) providing an analysis of particles other than yes/ no, (b) choosing between echoic versus nonechoic forms as answers to polar questions, and (c) deciding whether some non-lexically-based or nonverbal responses are systematically used in combination with polar particles to express (dis) agreement.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 287
页数:27
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SIMPLER SYNTAX
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Syntax
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SYNTAX SILENCE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)Veridical Dependency
[6]  
[Anonymous], PAPERS 20 REGIONAL M
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1958, Australian Journal of Philosophy
[8]  
[Anonymous], SEMANTICS VERSUS PRA
[9]  
[Anonymous], INTERDISCIPLINARY ST
[10]   BELIEF IN DISCOURSE REPRESENTATION-THEORY [J].
ASHER, N .
JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC, 1986, 15 (02) :127-189