Investigation of the spatial resolution of an online dose verification device

被引:8
作者
Asuni, G. [1 ,2 ]
Rickey, D. W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
McCurdy, B. M. C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CancerCare Manitoba, Div Med Phys, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Dept Phys & Astron, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[3] Univ Manitoba, Dept Radiol, Winnipeg, MB R3A 1R9, Canada
关键词
spatial resolution; detector response function; line spread function; transmission detector; dose verification; POINT-SPREAD FUNCTION; IONIZATION-CHAMBER; RADIOTHERAPY; QUALITY; BEAM; PERFORMANCE; DETECTORS; DOSIMETRY; FIELDS; LINE;
D O I
10.1118/1.3675972
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this work is to characterize a new online dose verification device, COMPASS transmission detector array (IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany). The array is composed of 1600 cylindrical ionization chambers of 3.8 mm diameter, separated by 6.5 mm center-to-center spacing, in a 40 x 40 arrangement. Methods: The line spread function (LSF) of a single ion chamber in the detector was measured with a narrow slit collimator for a 6 MV photon beam. The 0.25 x 10 mm(2) slit was formed by two machined lead blocks. The LSF was obtained by laterally translating the detector in 0.25 mm steps underneath the slit over a range of 24 mm and taking a measurement at each step. This measurement was validated with Monte Carlo simulation using BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc. The presampling modulation transfer function (MTF), the Fourier transform of the line spread function, was determined and compared to calculated (Monte Carlo and analytical) MTFs. Two head-and-neck intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) fields were measured using the device and were used to validate the LSF measurement. These fields were simulated with the BEAMnrc Monte Carlo model, and the Monte Carlo generated incident fluence was convolved with the 2D detector response function (derived from the measured LSF) to obtain calculated dose. The measured and calculated dose distributions were then quantitatively compared using chi-comparison criteria of 3% dose difference and 3 mm distance-to-agreement for in-field points (defined as those above the 10% maximum dose threshold). Results: The full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the measured detector response for a single chamber is 4.3 mm, which is comparable to the chamber diameter of 3.8 mm. The pre-sampling MTF was calculated, and the resolution of one chamber was estimated as 0.25 lp/mm from the first zero crossing. For both examined IMRT fields, the chi-comparison between measured and calculated data show good agreement with 95.1% and 96.3% of in-field points below chi of 1.0 for fields 1 and 2, respectively (with an average chi of 0.29 for IMRT field 1 and 0.24 for IMRT field 2). Conclusions: The LSF for a new novel online detector has been measured at 6 MV using a narrow slit technique, and this measurement has been validated by Monte Carlo simulation. The detector response function derived from line spread function has been applied to recover measured IMRT fields. The results have shown that the device measures IMRT fields accurately within acceptable tolerance. (C) 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3675972]
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 705
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Evaluation of EBT-2 model GAFCHROMIC™ film performance in water [J].
Aldelaijan, Saad ;
Devic, Slobodan ;
Mohammed, Huriyyah ;
Tomic, Nada ;
Liang, Li-Heng ;
DeBlois, Francois ;
Seuntjens, Jan .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (07) :3687-3693
[2]  
[Anonymous], COMPASS US GUID VERS
[3]   A Monte Carlo investigation of contaminant electrons due to a novel in vivo transmission detector [J].
Asuni, G. ;
Jensen, J. M. ;
McCurdy, B. M. C. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (04) :1207-1223
[4]  
ATTIX FA, 1986, INTRO RADIOLOGICAL P, DOI DOI 10.1118/1.2742778
[5]   A revision of the γ-evaluation concept for the comparison of dose distributions [J].
Bakai, A ;
Alber, M ;
Nüsslin, F .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (21) :3543-3553
[6]   Verification of IMRT fields by film dosimetry [J].
Bucciolini, M ;
Buonamici, FB ;
Casati, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (01) :161-168
[7]   Calibration of an amorphous-silicon flat panel portal imager for exit-beam dosimetry [J].
Chen, J ;
Chuang, CF ;
Morin, O ;
Aubin, M ;
Pouliot, J .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (03) :584-594
[8]   Performance of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) used in radiotherapy:: Image quality and dose measurements [J].
Cremers, F ;
Frenzel, T ;
Kausch, C ;
Albers, D ;
Schönborn, T ;
Schmidt, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (05) :985-996
[9]   Small fields:: Nonequilibrium radiation dosimetry [J].
Das, Indra J. ;
Ding, George X. ;
Ahnesjo, Anders .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (01) :206-215
[10]   Characteristics of metal-plate/film detectors at therapy energies. I. Modulation transfer function [J].
Falco, T ;
Fallone, BG .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (12) :2455-2462