Syntactic comprehension and working memory in children with specific language impairment, autism or Down syndrome

被引:27
作者
Fortunato-Tavares, Talita [1 ,2 ]
Andrade, Claudia R. F. [1 ]
Befi-Lopes, Debora [1 ]
Limongi, Suelly O. [1 ]
Fernandes, Fernanda D. M. [1 ]
Schwartz, Richard G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Physiotherapy Speech Language & Hearing Sci, Sch Med, BR-05360 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] CUNY, Grad Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Autism; children; Down syndrome; language disorder; specific language impairment; syntax; working memory; SENTENCE COMPREHENSION; PHONOLOGICAL MEMORY; WILLIAMS-SYNDROME; WH-QUESTIONS; EXPRESSIVE LANGUAGE; SPEAKING CHILDREN; SPECTRUM DISORDER; FRAGILE-X; SLI; INDIVIDUALS;
D O I
10.3109/02699206.2015.1027831
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
This study examined syntactic assignment for predicates and reflexives as well as working memory effects in the sentence comprehension of children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI), Down syndrome (DS), high functioning Autism (HFA) and Typical Language Development (TLD). Fifty-seven children (35 boys and 22 girls) performed a computerised picture-selection sentence comprehension task. Predicate attachment and reflexive antecedent assignment (with working memory manipulations) were investigated. The results showed that SLI, HFA and DS children exhibited poorer overall performance than TLD children. Children with SLI exhibited similar performance to the DS and HFA children only when working memory demands were higher. We conclude that children with SLI, HFA and DS differ from children with TLD in their comprehension of predicate and reflexive structures where the knowledge of syntactic assignment is required. Working memory manipulation had different effects on syntactic comprehension depending on language disorder. Intelligence was not an explanatory factor for the differences observed in performance.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 522
页数:24
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
Andrade C., 2004, ABFW TESTE LINGUAGEM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CHILD SYNDR, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511581786.010, 10.1017/CBO9780511581786.010]
[3]  
[Anonymous], WPPSI-IV): Administration
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Analise de Dados Categorizados Analysis of Categorical Data
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, THESIS U NOVA LISBOA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[8]   Concurrent Validity of the TONI-3 [J].
Banks, Sandra H. ;
Franzen, Michael D. .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2010, 28 (01) :70-79
[9]   CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY OF RAVENS PROGRESSIVE MATRICES WITH DEAF RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL STUDENTS [J].
BLENNERHASSETT, L ;
STROHMEIER, SJ ;
HIBBETT, C .
AMERICAN ANNALS OF THE DEAF, 1994, 139 (01) :104-110
[10]  
Boersma P., 2006, PRAAT VERSION 4 4 16