A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial comparing stepwise oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour

被引:7
作者
Yenuberi, Hilda [1 ]
Abraham, Anuja [1 ]
Sebastian, Ajit [1 ]
Benjamin, Santosh J. [1 ]
Jeyaseelan, Visalakshi [2 ]
Mathews, Jiji E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Christian Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Christian Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Biostat, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Oral; vaginal; misoprostol; oxytocin; induction; tachysystole; TERM;
D O I
10.1177/0049475515624856
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
A comparison of induction of labour (IOL) using three doses of 25 mu g vaginal misoprostol inserted at intervals of 4h or more with a stepwise oral regime starting with 50 mu g followed by two doses of 100 mu g was studied in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial in a tertiary centre in South India. Primary outcome was vaginal delivery in 24h. Significantly more women in the first group required oxytocin augmentation and a third dose of the drug than women in the second group. Uterine tachysystole and other maternal and neonatal complications were similar. Thus it is concluded that women induced with oral, as compared to vaginal misoprostol are more likely to labour without oxytocin.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 205
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Oral or vaginal misoprostol administration for induction of labor: A randomized, double-blind trial
    Adair, CD
    Weeks, JW
    Barrilleaux, S
    Edwards, M
    Burlison, K
    Lewis, DF
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (05) : 810 - 813
  • [2] Oral misoprostol for induction of labour
    Alfirevic, Z.
    Weeks, A.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (02):
  • [3] A masked randomized comparison of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction
    Bennett, KA
    Butt, K
    Crane, JMG
    Hutchens, D
    Young, DC
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (04) : 481 - 486
  • [4] BISHOP EH, 1964, OBSTET GYNECOL, V24, P266
  • [5] Cahill AG, 2009, OBSTET GYNECOL, V114, P124, DOI [10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a99def, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181aef106]
  • [6] A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour
    Chen, W.
    Xue, J.
    Peprah, M. K.
    Wen, S. W.
    Walker, M.
    Gao, Y.
    Tang, Y.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (03) : 346 - 354
  • [7] Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction - A randomized controlled trial
    Cheng, Shi-Yann
    Ming, Ho
    Lee, Jui-Chi
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (01) : 119 - 125
  • [8] Prospective randomized clinical trial of inpatient cervical ripening with stepwise oral misoprostol vs vaginal misoprostot
    Colón, I
    Clawson, K
    Hunter, K
    Druzin, ML
    Taslimi, MM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 192 (03) : 747 - 752
  • [9] Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix:: a systematic review
    Crane, J. M. G.
    Butler, B.
    Young, D. C.
    Hannah, M. E.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (12) : 1366 - 1376
  • [10] Oral misoprostol for induction of labour at term: randomised controlled trial
    Dodd, JM
    Crowther, CA
    Robinson, JS
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7540): : 509 - 511