Quantitative scratch visibility assessment of polymers based on Erichsen and ASTM/ISO scratch testing methodologies

被引:28
作者
Liu, Peng [1 ]
Browning, Robert Lee [1 ]
Sue, Hung-Jue [1 ]
Li, Jiang [2 ]
Jones, Scooter [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Mech Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Adv Composites Corp, Sydney, OH USA
关键词
Scratch visibility; ASTM scratch test; Delta L; Erichsen; Contrast; Thermoplastic olefins; FRICTION COEFFICIENT; POLYPROPYLENE; SURFACE; DEFORMATION; RESISTANCE; BEHAVIOR; PROPERTY; DAMAGE; MECHANISMS; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.04.015
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
A lack of effective quantitative tools for evaluating scratch visibility resistance of polymers has hindered the fundamental understanding of visible scratch-induced defects and effective approaches to improve performance. Thanks to the recent establishment of the Erichsen and ASTM/ISO scratch testing protocols, researchers are now able to give quantitative assessments of scratch visibility resistance with ease. Unfortunately, the above two methods differ in testing and evaluation approaches. The main objective of this work is to disseminate the similarities and differences between the two industrial scratch visibility determination methodologies. i.e., delta L (Delta L) for Erichsen and contrast for ASTM/ISO. A good correlation between the two methods can be established if the Delta L value is normalized against the original L value for the undamaged surface, similar to the concept of contrast. The surface deformation that gives rise to light scattering, such as scratch groove formation and the surface roughness on the scratch path, was studied for both methods using a set of three model thermoplastic olefin systems. The implication of the current research for quantitative scratch visibility assessment is discussed. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 640
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, D702705 ASTM
[2]   Effects of surface plasma treatment on tribology of thermoplastic polymers [J].
Bismarck, Alexander ;
Brostow, Witold ;
Chiu, Rachel ;
Lobland, Haley E. Hagg ;
Ho, Kingsley K. C. .
POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2008, 48 (10) :1971-1976
[3]   Scratch deformation of methanol plasticized poly(methylmethacrylate) surfaces [J].
Briscoe, BJ ;
Pelillo, E ;
Ragazzi, F ;
Sinha, SK .
POLYMER, 1998, 39 (11) :2161-2168
[4]  
Briscoe BJ, 1997, POLYM INT, V43, P359, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(199708)43:4<359::AID-PI772>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-C
[6]   Single-pass pendulum scratching of poly(styrene) and poly(methylmethacrylate) [J].
Briscoe, BJ ;
Delfino, A ;
Pelillo, E .
WEAR, 1999, 225 :319-328
[7]   Scratching maps for polymers [J].
Briscoe, BJ ;
Evans, PD ;
Pelillo, E ;
Sinha, SK .
WEAR, 1996, 200 (1-2) :137-147
[8]   Scratch hardness and deformation maps for polycarbonate and polyethylene [J].
Briscoe, BJ ;
Pelillo, E ;
Sinha, SK .
POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 1996, 36 (24) :2996-3005
[9]   Effects of slip agent and talc surface-treatment on the scratch behavior of thermoplastic olefins [J].
Browning, R ;
Lim, GT ;
Moyse, A ;
Sun, LY ;
Sue, HJ .
POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2006, 46 (05) :601-608
[10]   Quantitative evaluation of scratch resistance of polymeric coatings based on a standardized progressive load scratch test [J].
Browning, R. L. ;
Lim, G. -T. ;
Moyse, A. ;
Sue, H. -J. ;
Chen, H. ;
Earls, J. D. .
SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 201 (06) :2970-2976