Evaluation of the knowledge of the critical view of safety and recognition of the transoperative complexity during the laparoscopic cholecystectomy

被引:3
|
作者
Alanis-Rivera, Bianca [1 ]
Rangel-Olvera, Gabriel [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Especialidades Dr Belisario Dominguez, Dept Gen Surg, Av Tlahuac 4866, Mexico City 09930, DF, Mexico
[2] Hosp Gen Dr Manuel Gea Gonzal, Hosp Gen Milpa Alta, Dept Gen Surg, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2022年 / 36卷 / 11期
关键词
Critical view of safety; Cholecystectomy; Intraoperative complexity; ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS; MANAGEMENT; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-022-09120-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Since the establishment of the Critical view of safety (CVS), different strategies have been created such as bailout procedures (SC, subtotal cholecystectomy), classifications for preoperative and intraoperative complexity (The Parkland grading scale, PGS) and objective evaluation of the CVS (doublet score, DS) to establish a "Culture of Safety in Cholecystectomy, COSIC"; to avoid complications. Methods A multiple choice questionnaire was applied to residents and graduated surgeons from different Hospitals in Mexico during different national meetings; evaluating the knowledge of this different concepts (CVS, SC, PGS, DS), univariate logistic regression was used to assess the association of the knowledge with adverse events (AE) like the Bile duct injury. Results A total of 744 questionnaires were evaluated; 284 (38.17%) women and 460 (61.83%) men; 436 (58.6%) were residents and 308 (41.4%) graduated surgeons. 708 (95.16%) reported knowing the CVS; however, only (51.98%, p <= 0.001) defined the concept correctly, while 136 (18.28%) reported knowing the DS, but only 44 (5.91%) defined it correctly. Regarding the PGS, 398 (53.49%) mentioned knowing it, but only 262 defined it correctly. The concept of SC 642 (86.29%) reported knowing it; however, only (56.7%, p <= 0.001) correctly defined the techniques, being the reconstituting technique the preferred one (42.37% vs 34.89%). In this survey, the correct knowledge of the CVS (OR 0.47, p < 0.001), the subtotal techniques (OR 0.71 p = 0.07), the DS (OR 0.48 p < 0.001) and of the PGS (OR 0.28, p < 0.001) decreased the risk of presenting BDI. Conclusion Despite the COSIC and the timing of publication of the CVS; the percentage of people who can correctly define basic safety concepts is low among residents and licensed surgeons. Therefore, it is important to emphasize the dissemination of these concepts to obtain safe LC and thus reduce the incidence of complications. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:8408 / 8414
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A 'critical view' on a classical pitfall in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Dziodzio, Tomasz
    Weiss, Sascha
    Sucher, Robert
    Pratschke, Johann
    Biebl, Matthias
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, 2014, 5 (12): : 1218 - 1221
  • [32] Achieving the critical view of safety in the difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study of predictors of failure
    Ahmad H. M. Nassar
    Hwei J. Ng
    Arkadiusz Peter Wysocki
    Khurram Shahzad Khan
    Ines C. Gil
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 6039 - 6047
  • [33] Prevention of bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. "The critical view of safety"
    Heistermann, H. P.
    Tobusch, A.
    Palmes, D.
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2006, 131 (06): : 460 - 465
  • [34] Achieving the critical view of safety in the difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study of predictors of failure
    Nassar, Ahmad H. M.
    Ng, Hwei J.
    Wysocki, Arkadiusz Peter
    Khan, Khurram Shahzad
    Gil, Ines C.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (11): : 6039 - 6047
  • [35] The critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is optimized by exposing the inner layer of the subserosal layer
    Honda, Goro
    Iwanaga, Tomohiro
    Kurata, Masanao
    Watanabe, Fumiaki
    Satoh, Hiroki
    Iwasaki, Ken-ichi
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2009, 16 (04): : 445 - 449
  • [36] Scale and Safety: Analyzing the Association Between Intraoperative Difficulty and Achieving the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Khan, Hira Bakhtiar
    Shiraz, Ahmad
    Haseeb, Abdul
    Hamayun, Sana
    Ali, Aiman
    Zahid, Muhammad Jawad
    Alizai, Qaidar
    Karim, Maryam
    Rehman, Sajid Ur
    Ali, Irfan
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [37] Ten-year Audit of Safe Bail-Out Alternatives to the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Manatakis, Dimitrios K.
    Papageorgiou, Dimitrios
    Antonopoulou, Maria-Ioanna
    Stamos, Nikolaos
    Agalianos, Christos
    Ivros, Nikolaos
    Davides, Demetrios
    Pechlivanides, Georgios
    Kyriazanos, Ioannis D.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 43 (11) : 2728 - 2733
  • [38] A preoperative predictive scoring system to predict the ability to achieve the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis
    Onoe, Shunsuke
    Maeda, Atsuyuki
    Takayama, Yuichi
    Fukami, Yasuyuki
    Kaneoka, Yuji
    HPB, 2017, 19 (05) : 406 - 410
  • [39] Acute cholecystitis treated with urgent cholecystectomy achieves higher rate of critical view of safety when compared to interval cholecystectomy after tube cholecystostomy
    Alomari, Mohammad
    Polley, Courtland
    Edwards, Michael
    Stauffer, John
    Ritchie, Charles
    Bowers, Steven P.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2025, 39 (02): : 1299 - 1307
  • [40] Critical View of Safety Dissection and Rouviere's Sulcus for Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Descriptive Study
    Subedi, Sushil Sharma
    Neupane, Durga
    Lageju, Nimesh
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 33 (11): : 1081 - 1087