Evaluation of the knowledge of the critical view of safety and recognition of the transoperative complexity during the laparoscopic cholecystectomy

被引:3
作者
Alanis-Rivera, Bianca [1 ]
Rangel-Olvera, Gabriel [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Especialidades Dr Belisario Dominguez, Dept Gen Surg, Av Tlahuac 4866, Mexico City 09930, DF, Mexico
[2] Hosp Gen Dr Manuel Gea Gonzal, Hosp Gen Milpa Alta, Dept Gen Surg, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2022年 / 36卷 / 11期
关键词
Critical view of safety; Cholecystectomy; Intraoperative complexity; ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS; MANAGEMENT; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-022-09120-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Since the establishment of the Critical view of safety (CVS), different strategies have been created such as bailout procedures (SC, subtotal cholecystectomy), classifications for preoperative and intraoperative complexity (The Parkland grading scale, PGS) and objective evaluation of the CVS (doublet score, DS) to establish a "Culture of Safety in Cholecystectomy, COSIC"; to avoid complications. Methods A multiple choice questionnaire was applied to residents and graduated surgeons from different Hospitals in Mexico during different national meetings; evaluating the knowledge of this different concepts (CVS, SC, PGS, DS), univariate logistic regression was used to assess the association of the knowledge with adverse events (AE) like the Bile duct injury. Results A total of 744 questionnaires were evaluated; 284 (38.17%) women and 460 (61.83%) men; 436 (58.6%) were residents and 308 (41.4%) graduated surgeons. 708 (95.16%) reported knowing the CVS; however, only (51.98%, p <= 0.001) defined the concept correctly, while 136 (18.28%) reported knowing the DS, but only 44 (5.91%) defined it correctly. Regarding the PGS, 398 (53.49%) mentioned knowing it, but only 262 defined it correctly. The concept of SC 642 (86.29%) reported knowing it; however, only (56.7%, p <= 0.001) correctly defined the techniques, being the reconstituting technique the preferred one (42.37% vs 34.89%). In this survey, the correct knowledge of the CVS (OR 0.47, p < 0.001), the subtotal techniques (OR 0.71 p = 0.07), the DS (OR 0.48 p < 0.001) and of the PGS (OR 0.28, p < 0.001) decreased the risk of presenting BDI. Conclusion Despite the COSIC and the timing of publication of the CVS; the percentage of people who can correctly define basic safety concepts is low among residents and licensed surgeons. Therefore, it is important to emphasize the dissemination of these concepts to obtain safe LC and thus reduce the incidence of complications. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:8408 / 8414
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Laparoscopic entry techniques [J].
Ahmad, Gaity ;
Gent, David ;
Henderson, Daniel ;
O'Flynn, Helena ;
Phillips, Kevin ;
Watson, Andrew .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (08)
[2]  
Almutairi Abdulrahman Faraj, 2009, HPB Surg, V2009, P476159, DOI 10.1155/2009/476159
[3]   Magnetically anchored camera and percutaneous instruments maintain triangulation and improve cosmesis compared with single-site and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Arain, Nabeel A. ;
Rondon, Luisangel ;
Hogg, Deborah C. ;
Cadeddu, Jeffrey A. ;
Bergs, Richard ;
Fernandez, Raul ;
Scott, Daniel J. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (12) :3457-3466
[4]   One Thousand Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies in a Single Surgical Unit Using the "Critical View of Safety" Technique [J].
Avgerinos, C. ;
Kelgiorgi, D. ;
Touloumis, Z. ;
Baltatzi, L. ;
Dervenis, C. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2009, 13 (03) :498-503
[5]   Drainage vs. non-drainage after cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study [J].
Bawahab, Mohammed A. ;
Abd El Maksoud, Walid M. ;
Alsareii, Saeed A. ;
Al Amri, Fahad S. ;
Ali, Hala F. ;
Nimeri, Abdul Rahman ;
Al Amri, Abdul Rahman M. ;
Assiri, Adel A. ;
Aziz, Mohammed I. Abdul .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 28 (03) :240-245
[6]   Systematic Review of the Impact of Surgical Harm on Quality of Life After General and Gastrointestinal Surgery [J].
Bouras, George ;
Burns, Elaine Marie ;
Howell, Ann-Marie ;
Bagnall, Nigel Mark ;
Lee, Henry ;
Athanasiou, Thanos ;
Darzi, Ara .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2014, 260 (06) :975-983
[7]   Increasing resident utilization and recognition of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study from an academic medical center [J].
Chen, Crystal B. ;
Palazzo, Francesco ;
Doane, Stephen M. ;
Winter, Jordan M. ;
Lavu, Harish ;
Chojnacki, Karen A. ;
Rosato, Ernest L. ;
Yeo, Charles J. ;
Pucci, Michael J. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (04) :1627-1635
[8]   IRCAD recommendation on safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Conrad, Claudius ;
Wakabayashi, Go ;
Asbun, Horacio J. ;
Dallemagne, Bernard ;
Demartines, Nicolas ;
Diana, Michele ;
Fuks, David ;
Gimenez, Mariano Eduardo ;
Goumard, Claire ;
Kaneko, Hironori ;
Memeo, Riccardo ;
Resende, Alexandre ;
Scatton, Olivier ;
Schneck, Anne-Sophie ;
Soubrane, Olivier ;
Tanabe, Minoru ;
van den Bos, Jacqueline ;
Weiss, Helmut ;
Yamamoto, Masakazu ;
Marescaux, Jacques ;
Pessaux, Patrick .
JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2017, 24 (11) :603-615
[9]   Current practices in biliary surgery: Do we practice what we teach? [J].
Daly, Shaun C. ;
Deziel, Daniel J. ;
Li, Xuan ;
Thaqi, Milot ;
Millikan, Keith W. ;
Myers, Jonathan A. ;
Bonomo, Steven ;
Luu, Minh B. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (08) :3345-3350
[10]   Clinical experience with a simple retraction device in single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Technical description and initial results [J].
Dauser, Bernhard ;
Ghaffari, Shahbaz ;
Herbst, Friedrich .
MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 23 (3-4) :152-156