Quality of Life of Endodontically Treated versus Implant Treated Patients: A University-based Qualitative Research Study

被引:60
作者
Gatten, Dustin L. [1 ]
Riedy, Christine A. [2 ]
Hong, Sul Ki [3 ]
Johnson, James D. [1 ]
Cohenca, Nestor [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Endodont, Sch Dent, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Dent Publ Hlth Sci, Sch Dent, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Periodont, Sch Dent, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Pediat Dent, Sch Dent, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Endodontics; implants; Oral Health Impact Profile; quality of life; root canal; OUTCOMES; TEETH;
D O I
10.1016/j.joen.2011.03.026
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: Up-to-date studies comparing endodontic treatment versus implant-supported prosthesis have shown similar clinical outcome and survival rates. However, no data are available comparing both treatment modalities based on the patient's perception of quality of life. This study was designed to qualitatively describe and compare the quality of life of patients with restored, single endodontically treated teeth versus patients with single implant-supported fixed prostheses. Methods: Forty-eight patients agreed to participate in the study (n = 24 from each treatment modality). Of those, 37 actually participated in the study: 17 were endodontically treated and 20 had an implant-supported prosthesis. Patients in each of the two groups were randomly selected from the Graduate Endodontics and Graduate Periodontics Departments, respectively. Six focus group discussions (n = 3 per treatment group) were held and audio-recorded for subsequent thematic analysis. Data were analyzed to identify common themes within each category and compared to assess any differences in quality of life between the two treatments. Additionally, a quality of life survey, the shortened version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), was given before the discussion group and the responses analyzed. Results: The results obtained from this study show similar overall OHIP scores and show a high rate of satisfaction with both treatment modalities. Content analysis of the discussion groups revealed several themes and subthemes. The major themes were importance of overall health, financial implications of the treatments, perception of the treatments and its outcomes, time since treatment, and follow-up dental visits. Conclusions: The results help identify patients' perception and concerns with each treatment modality and assist the clinician and patient in the selection of an optimal treatment for their given situation. In addition to the prognosis and outcomes, clinicians should consider patients' perceptions and preferences as well as the influence each therapy may have on their quality of life, both short- and long-term. Overall, all the participants in this study were pleased with the treatment received and expressed a clear message to save their natural dentition whenever possible. (J Endod 2011;37:903-909)
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 909
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, DOI DOI 10.1002/NUR.4770140111
[2]   Influence of estrogen status on endosseous implant osseointegration [J].
August, M ;
Chung, K ;
Chang, Y ;
Glowacki, J .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 59 (11) :1285-1289
[3]  
Bader Herbert I, 2002, Implant Dent, V11, P217, DOI 10.1097/00008505-200207000-00005
[4]   Qualitative data analysis: Challenges and dilemmas related to theory and method [J].
Bailey, DM ;
Jackson, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2003, 57 (01) :57-65
[5]   FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEW - AN UNDERUTILIZED RESEARCH TECHNIQUE FOR IMPROVING THEORY AND PRACTICE IN HEALTH-EDUCATION [J].
BASCH, CE .
HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 1987, 14 (04) :411-448
[6]   Factors affecting outcomes for single-tooth implants and endodontic restorations [J].
Doyle, Scott L. ;
Hodges, James S. ;
Pesun, Igor J. ;
Baisden, Michael K. ;
Bowles, Walter R. .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2007, 33 (04) :399-402
[7]   Retrospective cross sectional comparison of initial nonsurgical endodontic treatment and single-tooth implants [J].
Doyle, Scott L. ;
Hodges, James S. ;
Pesun, Igor J. ;
Law, Alan S. ;
Bowles, Walter R. .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2006, 32 (09) :822-827
[8]   The effect of diabetes mellitus on endodontic treatment outcome - Data from an electronic patient record [J].
Fouad, AF ;
Burleson, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 134 (01) :43-+
[9]  
Friedman Shimon, 2004, J Calif Dent Assoc, V32, P493
[10]  
Herrmann I, 2005, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V20, P220