When Students Perform at the Below Basic Level on the NAEP: What Does It Mean and What Can Educators Do?

被引:6
作者
Hiebert, Elfrieda H. [1 ]
机构
[1] TextProject Org, TextProject, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 USA
关键词
VOCABULARY; COMPREHENSION; ENGLISH; SILENT; WORDS; INTERVENTIONS; READERS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/trtr.2082
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
According to interpretations of results from the latest oral reading fluency (ORF) study conducted by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (White et al., 2020), fourth-grade students who score below the basic standard require interventions that focus on word recognition, phonological decoding, and fluency. Before such mandates for students at the middle grades and beyond are enacted, the available information from ORF assessments should be examined from the view of what students know and what they do not know. In this paper, I examine the performances of students who score below the basic level on oral reading assessments such as those used in the NAEP/ORF study to identify students' strengths and challenges. Results of analyses of students' performances are used to address how instruction and interventions can best support students in developing the proficiencies required to perform successfully on silent reading comprehension tasks. Issues that particularly require attention in the design of instruction and interventions for readers in the middle grades who score below the basic level are the mode of reading (silent or oral), text, and reading volume.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 639
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1992, READ FRAM 1992 NAT A
  • [2] Brenner D., 2009, Reading more, reading better, P118
  • [3] Below the bar: Profiles of students who fail state reading assessments
    Buly, MR
    Valencia, SW
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS, 2002, 24 (03) : 219 - 239
  • [4] California State Board of Education, 2015, 2015 ENGL LANG ARTS
  • [5] CLAY M, 1989, EARLY DETECTION READ
  • [6] A new academic word list
    Coxhead, A
    [J]. TESOL QUARTERLY, 2000, 34 (02) : 213 - 238
  • [7] Investigating the validity of two widely used quantitative text tools
    Cunningham, James W.
    Hiebert, Elfrieda H.
    Mesmer, Heidi Anne
    [J]. READING AND WRITING, 2018, 31 (04) : 813 - 833
  • [8] Investigating the instructional supportiveness of leveled texts
    Cunningham, JW
    Spadorcia, SA
    Erickson, KA
    Koppenhaver, DA
    Sturm, JM
    Yoder, DE
    [J]. READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2005, 40 (04) : 410 - 427
  • [9] Has First-Grade Core Reading Program Text Complexity Changed Across Six Decades?
    Fitzgerald, Jill
    Elmore, Jeff
    Relyea, Jackie Eunjung
    Hiebert, Elfrieda H.
    Stenner, A. Jackson
    [J]. READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2016, 51 (01) : 7 - 28
  • [10] Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?
    Fuchs, D
    Fuchs, LS
    [J]. READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2006, 41 (01) : 93 - 99