Leave-One-Trial-Out, LOTO, a general approach to link single-trial parameters of cognitive models to neural data

被引:13
作者
Gluth, Sebastian [1 ]
Meiran, Nachshon [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Dept Psychol, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Psychol, Beer Sheva, Israel
[3] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Zlotowski Ctr Neurosci, Beer Sheva, Israel
来源
ELIFE | 2019年 / 8卷
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
TIME; CHOICE; EXPLAIN; FMRI; BIAS;
D O I
10.7554/eLife.42607
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A key goal of model-based cognitive neuroscience is to estimate the trial-by-trial fluctuations of cognitive model parameters in order to link these fluctuations to brain signals. However, previously developed methods are limited by being difficult to implement, time-consuming, or model-specific. Here, we propose an easy, efficient and general approach to estimating trial-wise changes in parameters: Leave-One-Trial-Out (LOTO). The rationale behind LOTO is that the difference between parameter estimates for the complete dataset and for the dataset with one omitted trial reflects the parameter value in the omitted trial. We show that LOTO is superior to estimating parameter values from single trials and compare it to previously proposed approaches. Furthermore, the method makes it possible to distinguish true variability in a parameter from noise and from other sources of variability. In our view, the practicability and generality of LOTO will advance research on tracking fluctuations in latent cognitive variables and linking them to neural data.
引用
收藏
页数:39
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Time discounting and time preference: A critical review
    Frederick, S
    Loewenstein, G
    O'Donoghue, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2002, 40 (02) : 351 - 401
  • [12] Friston KJ, 1994, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P189, DOI [DOI 10.1002/HBM.460020402, 10.1002/hbm.460020402]
  • [13] Gelman A., 1992, Statistical Science, V7, P457, DOI DOI 10.1214/SS/1177011136
  • [14] Geuter S., 2018, EFFECT SIZE POWER FM, V295048, DOI [10.1101/295048, DOI 10.1101/295048]
  • [15] Variability in behavior that cognitive models do not explain can be linked to neuroimaging data
    Gluth, Sebastian
    Rieskamp, Jorg
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 76 : 104 - 116
  • [16] Gluth S, 2017, J NEUROSCI, V37, P371, DOI [10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2532-16.2017, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2532-16.2016]
  • [17] Effective Connectivity between Hippocampus and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Controls Preferential Choices from Memory
    Gluth, Sebastian
    Sommer, Tobias
    Rieskamp, Joerg
    Buechel, Christian
    [J]. NEURON, 2015, 86 (04) : 1078 - 1090
  • [18] Deciding When to Decide: Time-Variant Sequential Sampling Models Explain the Emergence of Value-Based Decisions in the Human Brain
    Gluth, Sebastian
    Rieskamp, Joerg
    Buechel, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 32 (31) : 10686 - 10698
  • [19] On the efficiency of neurally-informed cognitive models to identify latent cognitive states
    Hawkins, Guy E.
    Mittner, Matthias
    Forstmann, Birte U.
    Heathcote, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 76 : 142 - 155
  • [20] An adaptive, individualized fMRI delay discounting procedure to increase flexibility and optimize scanner time
    Koffarnus, Mikhail N.
    Deshpande, Harshawardhan U.
    Lisinski, Jonathan M.
    Eklund, Anders
    Bickel, Warren K.
    LaConte, Stephen M.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2017, 161 : 56 - 66