Pragmatic randomised evaluation of stable thoracolumbar fracture treatment outcomes (PRESTO): study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial combined with a qualitative study and survey

被引:7
作者
Cook, Elizabeth [1 ]
Booth, Alison [1 ]
Coleman, Elizabeth [1 ]
Scantlebury, Arabella [1 ]
McDaid, Catriona [1 ]
Hewitt, Catherine [1 ]
Corbacho, Belen [1 ]
Rangan, Amar [2 ]
Adamson, Joy [1 ]
Ranganathan, Arun [3 ]
Khan, Almas [4 ]
Ahuja, Sashin [5 ]
Turner, Emma [1 ]
May, Peter [3 ]
Hilton, Catherine [3 ]
Torgerson, David J. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York Trials Unit, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] South Tees Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, James Cook Univ Hosp, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, N Yorkshire, England
[3] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, Royal London Hosp, Whitechapel Rd, London E1 1BB, England
[4] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Leeds Gen Infirm, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Cardiff & Vale Univ Hlth Board, Univ Hosp Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XW, Wales
[6] Univ York, Fac Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, York Trials Unit, ARRC Bldg, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[7] Univ York, Fac Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, NIHR RDS YH, ARRC Bldg, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
Thoracolumbar; Fracture; Surgical fixation; Randomised controlled trial; Qualitative; Survey; Feasibility; Pilot; OF-LIFE; CARE; RELIABILITY; MANAGEMENT; SCALES; PAIN;
D O I
10.1186/s40814-020-00574-5
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundA thoracolumbar fracture is the most common fracture of the spinal column. Where the fracture is not obviously stable or unstable, the optimal management is uncertain. There are variations between surgeons, treating centres and within the evidence base as to whether surgical or non-surgical approaches should be used. In addition, the boundaries of this zone of uncertainty for stability are unclear.This study has been designed in response to an NIHR HTA commissioning brief to assess the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale trial to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical treatments for thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit.MethodsAssessment of feasibility will be addressed through three elements: a randomised external feasibility study, a national survey of surgeons and a qualitative study.The external feasibility study is a pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial comparing surgical fixation (intervention) versus non-surgical management (control). Recruitment will take place in three secondary care centres in the UK.The primary outcome is recruitment rate, defined as the proportion of eligible participants who are randomised. Further outcomes related to recruitment, randomisation, drop-out, cross-over, loss to follow-up, completeness of outcome data, study processes and details of the interventions delivered will be collected.The survey of surgeons and qualitative study of clinicians, recruiting staff and patients will enhance the feasibility study, enabling a broad overview of current practice in the field in addition to perceived facilitators and barriers to running a full-scale trial.DiscussionPRESTO is a feasibility study which aims to inform methodology for a definitive trial comparing surgical fixation with non-surgical management for patients with stable thoracolumbar fractures.Trial registrationThe trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Register (ISRCTN12094890). Date of registration was 22/02/2018 (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12094890).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit [J].
Abudou, Minawaer ;
Chen, Xueyi ;
Kong, Xiangyu ;
Wu, Taixiang .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (06)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, GOOD RES PRACT PRINC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, POS STAT US EQ 5D 5L
[4]   Enhancing Surveys of Health Care Professionals: A Meta-Analysis of Techniques to Improve Response [J].
Cho, Young Ik ;
Johnson, Timothy P. ;
VanGeest, Jonathan B. .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2013, 36 (03) :382-407
[5]   A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain [J].
Clement, R. Carter ;
Welander, Adina ;
Stowell, Caleb ;
Cha, Thomas D. ;
Chen, John L. ;
Davies, Michelle ;
Fairbank, Jeremy C. ;
Foley, Kevin T. ;
Gehrchen, Martin ;
Hagg, Olle ;
Jacobs, Wilco C. ;
Kahler, Richard ;
Khan, Safdar N. ;
Lieberman, Isador H. ;
Morisson, Beth ;
Ohnmeiss, Donna D. ;
Peul, Wilco C. ;
Shonnard, Neal H. ;
Smuck, Matthew W. ;
Solberg, Tore K. ;
Stromqvist, Bjorn H. ;
Van Hooff, Miranda L. ;
Wasan, Ajay D. ;
Willems, Paul C. ;
Yeo, William ;
FRitzell, Peter .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2015, 86 (05) :523-533
[6]   A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: Reliability and responsiveness [J].
Davidson, M ;
Keating, JL .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2002, 82 (01) :8-24
[7]  
Department of Health, 2016, NHS REF COSTS
[8]   Outcome measures for low back pain research - A proposal for standardized use [J].
Deyo, RA ;
Battie, M ;
Beurskens, AJHM ;
Bombardier, C ;
Croft, P ;
Koes, B ;
Malmivaara, A ;
Roland, M ;
Von Korff, M ;
Waddell, G .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (18) :2003-2013
[9]   Methodological Issues Surrounding the Use of Baseline Health-Related Quality of Life Data to Inform Trial-Based Economic Evaluations of Interventions Within Emergency and Critical Care Settings: A Systematic Literature Review [J].
Dritsaki, Melina ;
Achana, Felix ;
Mason, James ;
Petrou, Stavros .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2017, 35 (05) :501-515
[10]   Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires [J].
Edwards, Philip James ;
Roberts, Ian ;
Clarke, Mike J. ;
DiGuiseppi, Carolyn ;
Wentz, Reinhard ;
Kwan, Irene ;
Cooper, Rachel ;
Felix, Lambert M. ;
Pratap, Sarah .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (03)