Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade

被引:0
|
作者
Green, BN [1 ]
Johnson, CD [1 ]
Adams, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Palmer Coll Chiropract W, San Jose, CA 95134 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPORTS CHIROPRACTIC & REHABILITATION | 2001年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
review literature; authorship; peer review; research; manuscripts; meta-analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
objective: To describe and discuss the process used to write a narrative review of the literature for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The JSCR wishes to standardize its publication of narrative overviews of the literature to increase their objectivity. background: In the past decade numerous changes in research methodology pertaining to reviews of the literature have occurred. These changes necessitate authors of review articles to be familiar with current standards in the publication process. methods: Narrative overview of the literature synthesizing the findings of literature retrieved from searches of computerized databases, hand searches, and authoritative texts. discussion: An overview of the use of three types of reviews of the literature is presented. Step by step instructions for how to conduct and write a narrative overview utilizing a 'best-evidence synthesis' approach are discussed, starting with appropriate preparatory work and ending with how to create proper illustrations. Several resources for creating reviews of the literature are presented and a narrative overview critical appraisal worksheet is included. A bibliography of other useful reading is presented in an appendix. conclusion: Narrative overviews can be a valuable contribution to the literature if prepared properly. New and experienced authors wishing to write a narrative overview should find this article useful in constructing such a paper and carrying out the research process. It is hoped that this article will stimulate scholarly dialog amongst colleagues about this research design and other complex literature review methods.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 19
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Important Distinction Between Peer-Reviewed and Predatory Journals: A Bacterial Endotoxin Test Case
    Tindall, Brendan
    Uhlig, Thomas
    Perdomo-Morales, Rolando
    PUBLISHING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2021, 37 (03) : 399 - 406
  • [22] Are abstracts presented at the EAU meeting followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals? A critical analysis
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Quarto, Giuseppe
    Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe
    De Sio, Marco
    Damiano, Rocco
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (03) : 833 - 840
  • [23] Peer-Reviewed Veterinary Journals From Arabic-Speaking Countries: A Systematic Review
    Robertson, Kristen M.
    Bowser, Jacquelyn E.
    Bernstein, Joshua
    Aboul-Enein, Basil H.
    ANNALS OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2017, 83 (3-4): : 524 - 529
  • [24] Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews
    Jennifer A. Byrne
    Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1 (1)
  • [25] Publication patterns of the American Society of Pediatric Neurosurgeons - Is there support among members for peer-reviewed pediatric neurosurgical journals?
    Dias, MS
    PEDIATRIC NEUROSURGERY, 1998, 28 (03) : 111 - 120
  • [26] Writing a manuscript for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal: Guidance from the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy
    Francesca Wirth
    Cathal A. Cadogan
    Daniela Fialová
    Ankie Hazen
    Monika Lutters
    Vibhu Paudyal
    Anita E. Weidmann
    Betul Okuyan
    Martin C. Henman
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2024, 46 : 548 - 554
  • [27] Writing a manuscript for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal: Guidance from the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy
    Wirth, Francesca
    Cadogan, Cathal A.
    Fialova, Daniela
    Hazen, Ankie
    Lutters, Monika
    Paudyal, Vibhu
    Weidmann, Anita E.
    Okuyan, Betul
    Henman, Martin C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2024, 46 (02) : 548 - 554
  • [28] Seasonal Entropy, Diversity and Inequality Measures of Submitted and Accepted Papers Distributions in Peer-Reviewed Journals
    Ausloos, Marcel
    Nedic, Olgica
    Dekanski, Aleksandar
    ENTROPY, 2019, 21 (06)
  • [29] Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature
    Clarissa F. D. Carneiro
    Victor G. S. Queiroz
    Thiago C. Moulin
    Carlos A. M. Carvalho
    Clarissa B. Haas
    Danielle Rayêe
    David E. Henshall
    Evandro A. De-Souza
    Felippe E. Amorim
    Flávia Z. Boos
    Gerson D. Guercio
    Igor R. Costa
    Karina L. Hajdu
    Lieve van Egmond
    Martin Modrák
    Pedro B. Tan
    Richard J. Abdill
    Steven J. Burgess
    Sylvia F. S. Guerra
    Vanessa T. Bortoluzzi
    Olavo B. Amaral
    Research Integrity and Peer Review, 5
  • [30] Peer-reviewed public health journals from Arabic-speaking countries: An updated snapshot
    Basil H. Aboul-Enein
    Joshua Bernstein
    Jacquelyn E. Bowser
    Journal of Public Health Policy, 2017, 38 : 146 - 157