共 14 条
- [1] *COMM PUBL ETH, CODE CONDUCT
- [2] THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON ACCEPTANCE OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY PEER-REVIEW [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (02): : 143 - 146
- [3] GODLEE F, J AM MED ASS, V280, P237
- [4] *INT COMM MED J ED, 2010, BIOMEDICAL J UNPUB
- [5] Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? - A randomized controlled trial [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03): : 240 - 242
- [6] Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care? [J]. PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (04):
- [7] THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON THE QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (10): : 1371 - 1376
- [8] MULTIPLE BLINDED REVIEWS OF THE 2 MANUSCRIPTS - EFFECTS OF REFEREE CHARACTERISTICS AND PUBLICATION LANGUAGE [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (02): : 149 - 151