Systems Approach to Creating Test Scenarios for Automated Driving Systems

被引:65
作者
Khastgir, Siddartha [1 ]
Brewerton, Simon [2 ]
Thomas, John [3 ]
Jennings, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, WMG, Warwick, England
[2] Aurrigo Driverless Technol, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[3] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Autonomous vehicles; STPA; Safety; Testing; test scenarios; Hazards; SAFETY ASSURANCE; HAZARD ANALYSIS; ACCIDENT MODEL; RISK ANALYSIS; PROCESS STAMP; RELIABILITY; COMPLEXITY; MANAGEMENT; PROPAGATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2021.107610
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Increased safety has been advocated as one of the major benefits of the introduction of Automated Driving Systems (ADSs). Incorporation of ADSs in vehicles means that associated software has safety critical application, thus requiring exhaustive testing. To prove ADSs are safer than human drivers, some work has suggested that they will need to be driven for over 11 billion miles. The number of test miles driven is not, by itself, a meaningful metric for judging the safety of ADSs. Rather, the types of scenarios encountered by the ADSs during testing are critically important. With a Hazard Based Testing approach, this paper proposes that the extent to which testing miles are 'smart miles' that reflect hazard-based scenarios relevant to the way in which an ADS fails or handles hazards is a fundamental, if not pivotal, consideration for safety-assurance of ADSs. Using Systems Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) method as a foundation, an extension to the STPA method has been developed to identify test scenarios. The approach has been applied to a real-world case study of a SAE Level 4 Low-Speed Automated Driving system (a.k.a. a shuttle). This paper, discusses the STPA analysis and a newly-developed test scenarios creation method derived from STPA.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
[21]   A new definition of complexity in a risk analysis setting [J].
Jensen, Anders ;
Aven, Terje .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2018, 171 :169-173
[22]  
Kaiser Bernhard., 2003, Safety Critical Systems and Software 2003, Eigth Australian Workshop on Safety-Related Programmable Systems, V33, P37
[23]   Driving to safety: How many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability? [J].
Kalra, Nidhi ;
Paddock, Susan M. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2016, 94 :182-193
[24]  
Kelm Gary G., 2010, FAILURE MODES EFFECT
[25]  
Khastgir S., 2017, SAE Technical Papers
[26]  
KHASTGIR S, 2017, P IEEE 20 INT C INT, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2017.8317868
[27]  
Khastgir S, 2018, SAE TECHNICAL PAPER, DOI [10.4271/ 2018-01-1070. 2018-01-1070, DOI 10.4271/2018-01-1070.2018-01-1070]
[28]   Calibrating trust through knowledge: Introducing the concept of informed safety for automation in vehicles [J].
Khastgir, Siddartha ;
Birrell, Stewart ;
Dhadyalla, Gunwant ;
Jennings, Paul .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 96 :290-303
[29]   Towards increased reliability by objectification of Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA) of automated automotive systems [J].
Khastgir, Siddartha ;
Birrell, Stewart ;
Dhadyalla, Gunwant ;
Sivencrona, Hakan ;
Jennings, Paul .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2017, 99 :166-177
[30]  
Khastgir S, 2015, IEEE INT VEH SYM, P648, DOI 10.1109/IVS.2015.7225758