Systems Approach to Creating Test Scenarios for Automated Driving Systems

被引:65
作者
Khastgir, Siddartha [1 ]
Brewerton, Simon [2 ]
Thomas, John [3 ]
Jennings, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, WMG, Warwick, England
[2] Aurrigo Driverless Technol, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[3] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Autonomous vehicles; STPA; Safety; Testing; test scenarios; Hazards; SAFETY ASSURANCE; HAZARD ANALYSIS; ACCIDENT MODEL; RISK ANALYSIS; PROCESS STAMP; RELIABILITY; COMPLEXITY; MANAGEMENT; PROPAGATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2021.107610
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Increased safety has been advocated as one of the major benefits of the introduction of Automated Driving Systems (ADSs). Incorporation of ADSs in vehicles means that associated software has safety critical application, thus requiring exhaustive testing. To prove ADSs are safer than human drivers, some work has suggested that they will need to be driven for over 11 billion miles. The number of test miles driven is not, by itself, a meaningful metric for judging the safety of ADSs. Rather, the types of scenarios encountered by the ADSs during testing are critically important. With a Hazard Based Testing approach, this paper proposes that the extent to which testing miles are 'smart miles' that reflect hazard-based scenarios relevant to the way in which an ADS fails or handles hazards is a fundamental, if not pivotal, consideration for safety-assurance of ADSs. Using Systems Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) method as a foundation, an extension to the STPA method has been developed to identify test scenarios. The approach has been applied to a real-world case study of a SAE Level 4 Low-Speed Automated Driving system (a.k.a. a shuttle). This paper, discusses the STPA analysis and a newly-developed test scenarios creation method derived from STPA.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
[11]   Are consumers willing to pay to let cars drive for them? Analyzing response to autonomous vehicles [J].
Daziano, Ricardo A. ;
Sarrias, Mauricio ;
Leard, Benjamin .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2017, 78 :150-164
[12]   The role of safety architectures in aviation safety cases [J].
Denney, Ewen ;
Pai, Ganesh ;
Whiteside, Iain .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 191
[13]   Safety certification of airborne software: An empirical study [J].
Dodd, Ian ;
Habli, Ibrahim .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2012, 98 (01) :7-23
[14]  
Duckworth HA, 2010, IND INNOV SER, P1, DOI 10.1201/EBK1439803721
[15]   Safety assurance in NextGen and complex transportation systems [J].
Fleming, Cody Harrison ;
Spencer, Melissa ;
Thomas, John ;
Leveson, Nancy ;
Wilkinson, Chris .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2013, 55 :173-187
[16]  
France ME, 2017, Engineering for Humans: A New Extension to STPA
[17]  
Gangopadhyay B, 2019, P IEEE INT TRASNP SY
[18]   How to assess the benefits of connected vehicles? A simulation framework for the design of cooperative traffic management strategies [J].
Gueriau, Maxime ;
Billot, Romain ;
El Faouzi, Nour-Eddin ;
Monteil, Julien ;
Armetta, Frederic ;
Hassas, Salima .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, 67 :266-279
[19]  
Ishimatsu T., 2010, P 4 IAASS C MAK SAF, pSP
[20]   Hazard Analysis of Complex Spacecraft Using Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis [J].
Ishimatsu, Takuto ;
Leveson, Nancy G. ;
Thomas, John P. ;
Fleming, Cody H. ;
Katahira, Masafumi ;
Miyamoto, Yuko ;
Ujiie, Ryo ;
Nakao, Haruka ;
Hoshino, Nobuyuki .
JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2014, 51 (02) :509-522