Adapting Simon's Two-Stage Design for Efficient Screening of Filovirus Vaccines in Non-Human Primates

被引:0
作者
Niemuth, Nancy A. [1 ]
Sabourin, Carol L. [1 ,3 ]
Ward, Lucy A. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Battelle Mem Inst, Columbus, OH 43201 USA
[2] Natl Inst Allergy & Infect Dis, Natl Institutes Hlth, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Tunnell Govt Serv Inc, Bethesda, MD 20817 USA
[4] US Dept Def DOD, Joint Program Execut Off Chem Biol Radiol & Nucl, Joint Project Manager Chem Biol Radiol & Nucl Med, Ft Detrick, MD 21702 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
vaccine screening; Marburg virus (MARV); Sudan virus (SUDV); Ebola virus (EBOV); Simon's two-stage; CLINICAL-TRIALS; EBOLA-VIRUS; PROTECTS; IMMUNIZATION;
D O I
10.3390/vaccines10081216
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) non-human primate (NHP) is widely used for filovirus vaccine testing. To use limited BSL-4 resources efficiently and minimize NHP usage, Simon's two-stage design was adapted to screen candidate Ebola virus (EBOV) vaccines in up to six NHPs with two (optimal), three, or four NHPs in Stage 1. Using the optimal design, two NHPs were tested in Stage 1. If neither survived, the candidate was rejected. Otherwise, it was eligible for Stage 2 testing in four NHPs. Candidates advanced if four or more NHPs were protected over both stages. An 80% efficacious candidate vaccine had 88.5% probability of advancing, and a 40% efficacious candidate vaccine had 83% probability of rejection. Simon's two-stage design was used to screen 27 EBOV vaccine candidates in 43 candidate regimens that varied in dose, adjuvant, formulation, or schedule. Of the 30 candidate regimens tested using two NHPs in Stage 1, 15 were rejected, nine were withdrawn, and six were tested in Stage 2. All six tested in Stage 2 qualified to advance in the product development pipeline. Multiple regimens for the EBOV vaccines approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019 were tested in this program. This approach may also prove useful for screening Sudan virus (SUDV) and Marburg virus (MARV) vaccine candidates.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Overview, Control Strategies, and Lessons Learned in the CDC Response to the 2014-2016 Ebola Epidemic
    Bell, Beth P.
    Damon, Inger K.
    Jernigan, Daniel B.
    Kenyon, Thomas A.
    Nichol, Stuart T.
    O'Connor, John P.
    Tappero, Jordan W.
    [J]. MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, 2016, 65 : 4 - 11
  • [2] A mouse model for evaluation of prophylaxis and therapy of Ebola hemorrhagic fever
    Bray, M
    Davis, K
    Geisbert, T
    Schmaljohn, C
    Huggins, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 178 (03) : 651 - 661
  • [3] Envigo, 2022, COVID 19 HAS AFF NON
  • [4] European Medicines Agency Ervebo, US
  • [5] European Medicines Agency Mvabea, US
  • [6] European Medicines Agency Zabdeno, US
  • [7] Food and Drug Administration ERVEBO, US
  • [8] Properties of replication-competent vesicular stomatitis virus vectors expressing glycoproteins of filoviruses and arenaviruses
    Garbutt, M
    Liebscher, R
    Wahl-Jensen, V
    Jones, S
    Möller, P
    Wagner, R
    Volchkov, V
    Klenk, HD
    Feldmann, H
    Ströher, U
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 2004, 78 (10) : 5458 - 5465
  • [9] Ebola vaccine development: Systematic review of pre-clinical and clinical studies, and meta-analysis of determinants of antibody response variability after vaccination
    Gross, Lise
    Lhomme, Edouard
    Pasin, Chloe
    Richert, Laura
    Thiebaut, Rodolphe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 74 : 83 - 96
  • [10] Challenges, Progress, and Opportunities: Proceedings of the Filovirus Medical Countermeasures Workshop
    Hirschberg, Rona
    Ward, Lucy A.
    Kilgore, Nicole
    Kurnat, Rebecca
    Schiltz, Helen
    Albrecht, Mark T.
    Christopher, George W.
    Nuzum, Ed
    [J]. VIRUSES-BASEL, 2014, 6 (07): : 2673 - 2697