Real-life treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with regorafenib: a single-centre review

被引:11
|
作者
Gotfrit, J. [1 ]
Vickers, M. [1 ,2 ]
Sud, S. [1 ]
Asmis, T. [1 ,2 ]
Cripps, C. [1 ,2 ]
Goel, R. [1 ,2 ]
Hsu, T. [1 ,2 ]
Jonker, D. [1 ,2 ]
Goodwin, R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Div Med Oncol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Metastatic colorectal cancer; regorafenib; systemic therapy; real-world settings; PHASE-3; TRIAL; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.3747/co.24.3562
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Various tyrosine kinase signalling pathways affect the development and progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). In clinical trials, regorafenib has been associated with a survival benefit in metastatic CRC (mCRC). We assessed the safety and efficacy of regorafenib in real-world patients. Methods In a retrospective review of patients with mCRC treated with regorafenib at our institution from 2013 to 2015, patient demographics, treatment, and survival data were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (os) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results In total, 48 patients were offered regorafenib, and 35 (73%) started treatment. Of the patients who started regorafenib, 57% were men. Median age in the cohort was 61 years, and all patients had a performance status in the range 0-2. Time from diagnosis of mCRC to regorafenib treatment was more than 18 months in 71% of patients. Starting dose was 160 mg in 54% of the patients, 120 mg in 40%, and 80 mg in 6%. Dose reductions occurred in 34% of the patients, and interruptions, in 29%. Best response was progressive disease (60%) and stable disease (17%); response in the rest of the patients was unknown. The most common adverse events on regorafenib (any grade) were fatigue (57%), hyperbilirubinemia (43%), thrombocytopenia (37%), anorexia (31%), and hypertension (31%). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were fatigue (29%), hypophosphatemia (17%), weight loss (11%), and hyperbilirubinemia (9%). Common reasons for discontinuing regorafenib included progressive disease (51%) and toxicity (26%). In patients treated with regorafenib, PFS was 2.4 months (95% confidence interval: 1.8 to 3.3 months) and os was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval: 3.7 to 8.9 months). No factors were associated with survival in univariate or multivariate analysis. Conclusions In a real-world setting, regorafenib is associated with survival similar to that reported in the randomized controlled trials, but at the expense of toxicity leading to discontinuation in many patients. Future studies of regorafenib should focus on identifying the patients most likely to benefit and on minimizing toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 239
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adherence and safety of regorafenib for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: observational real-life study
    Del Prete, Salvatore
    Cennamo, Gregorio
    Leo, Luigi
    Montella, Liliana
    Vincenzi, Bruno
    Biglietto, Maria
    Andreozzi, Francesca
    Prudente, Antonella
    Iodice, Patrizia
    Savastano, Clementina
    Nappi, Anna
    Montesarchio, Vincenzo
    Addeo, Raffaele
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2017, 13 (05) : 415 - 423
  • [2] Regorafenib in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer
    de la Fouchardiere, Christelle
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2018, 14 (22) : 2239 - 2246
  • [3] Regorafenib: A Review in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Dhillon, Sohita
    DRUGS, 2018, 78 (11) : 1133 - 1144
  • [4] Personalization of regorafenib treatment in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours in real-life clinical practice
    Nannini, Margherita
    Nigro, Maria Concetta
    Vincenzi, Bruno
    Fumagalli, Elena
    Grignani, Giovanni
    D'Ambrosio, Lorenzo
    Badalamenti, Giuseppe
    Incorvaia, Lorena
    Bracci, Raffaella
    Gasperoni, Silvia
    Saponara, Maristella
    Gatto, Lidia
    Indio, Valentina
    Astolfi, Annalisa
    Di Scioscio, Valerio
    Casali, Paolo G.
    Tonini, Giuseppe
    Aglietta, Massimo
    Russo, Antonio
    Biasco, Guido
    Pantaleo, Maria A.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 9 (12) : 731 - 739
  • [5] Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review
    Skarderud, Maria Roed
    Polk, Anne
    Vistisen, Kirsten Kjeldgaard
    Larsen, Finn Ole
    Nielsen, Dorte Lisbet
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2018, 62 : 61 - 73
  • [6] Prognostic factors for regorafenib treatment in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-life retrospective multi-center study
    Aydin, Sabin Goktas
    Kavak, Engin Eren
    Topcu, Atakan
    Bayramgil, Ayberk
    Akgul, Fahri
    Kahraman, Seda
    Aykan, Musa Baris
    Altintas, Yunus Emre
    Helvaci, Kaan
    Urun, Yuksel
    Bilici, Ahmet
    Seker, Mesut
    Sendur, Mehmet Ali Nahit
    Olmez, Omer Fatih
    Acikgoz, Ozgur
    Cicin, Irfan
    BIOMOLECULES AND BIOMEDICINE, 2023, 23 (06): : 1089 - 1095
  • [7] Treatment options after regorafenib failure in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Eraslan, E.
    Dogan, M.
    Yildiz, F.
    Ilhan, A.
    Oksuzoglu, O. B.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (09) : 3470 - 3477
  • [8] Real-world effectiveness of regorafenib in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective, observational study
    Wang, Hailing
    Liu, Weiling
    Zhao, Yan
    Hu, Hongtao
    Zhang, Bin
    Yang, Shujun
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 19 (05) : E291 - E299
  • [9] Regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Sartore-Bianchi, Andrea
    Zeppellini, Annalisa
    Amatu, Alessio
    Ricotta, Riccardo
    Bencardino, Katia
    Siena, Salvatore
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2014, 14 (03) : 255 - 265
  • [10] Regorafenib as Salvage Treatment in Korean Patients with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Kim, Seung Tae
    Kim, Tae Won
    Kim, Kyu-Pyo
    Kim, Tae-You
    Han, Sae-Won
    Lee, Ji Yun
    Lim, Sung Hee
    Lee, Min-Young
    Kim, Haesu
    Park, Young Suk
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 47 (04): : 790 - 795