Retention of zirconia crowns to Ti-base abutments: effect of luting protocol, abutment treatment and autoclave sterilization

被引:24
作者
Bergamo, Edmara T. P. [1 ]
Zahoui, Abbas [1 ]
Amorin Ikejiri, Larissa Luri [1 ]
Marun, Manoela [1 ]
da Silva, Kimberly Peixoto [1 ]
Coelho, Paulo G. [2 ]
Soares, Simone [1 ]
Bonfante, Estevam A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont & Periodontol, 9-75 Octavio Pinheiro Brisolla, BR-17012901 Bauru, SP, Brazil
[2] NYU, Dept Biomat & Biomimet, Dept Biomed Engn, Hansjorg Wyss Dept Plast Surg,Tandon Sch Engn Bro, New York, NY USA
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Dental implants; Dental prosthesis; Dental prosthesis Retention; Resin cement; Sterilization; CUSTOMIZED TITANIUM ABUTMENTS; METAL IMPLANT ABUTMENTS; RESIN CEMENTS; CONVENTIONAL WORKFLOWS; CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE; SINGLE CROWNS; FOLLOW-UP; SURVIVAL; AGENTS; RECONSTRUCTIONS;
D O I
10.2186/jpr.JPOR_2019_537
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the influence of resin cement type, surface pretreatment and autoclave sterilization on the retention of Y-TZP crowns to Ti-base abutments. Methods: Y-TZP crowns were designed and milled to fit Ti-base abutments. Crowns were cemented using either a conventional resin cement (conventional) with a universal adhesive or a self-adhesive resin cement (self-adhesive), both following no surface pretreatment (No) or Ti-base abutment sandblasting (SB) (n=20/group). Half of the cemented samples were subjected to in-office autoclave sterilization. Pullout testing was performed in a universal testing machine at a speed of 1 mm/min until crown displacement. Data were statistically evaluated through a linear mixed model following post hoc comparisons by LSD test. Results: Pullout data as a function of cement type demonstrated higher retention for conventional relative to self-adhesive cement (p<0.001). Ti-base sandblasting (SB) favored crown retentiveness over No pretreatment (p<0.001). Sterilized crowns exhibited higher pullout values than non-sterile (p=0.036). All the two- and three-factor interaction analyses corroborated with the superior adhesive strength of conventional compared to self-adhesive cement (all, p<0 .011), as well as, SB relative to No pretreatment (all, p<0.024). While autoclave sterilization maximized bond strength when self-adhesive cement (data collapsed over surface pretreatment, p<0.050) and No pretreatment were evaluated (data collapsed over surface pretreatment. p<0.013), no significant difference was observed for conventional resin cement (p=0.280) and SB (p=0.878) groups. Conclusions: Conventional resin cement and/or Ti-base sandblasting increased Y-TZP crown retentiveness, with no significant influence of autoclave sterilization. Autoclaving increased retentiveness when self-adhesive cement andlor no Ti-base pretreatment were used.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 175
页数:5
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Almehmadi Nehal, 2019, Dent Clin North Am, V63, P531, DOI 10.1016/j.cden.2019.02.014
[2]   Adhesive bonding of resin composite to various titanium surfaces using diferente metal conditioners and a surface modification system [J].
Almilhatti, Hercules Jorge ;
Neppelenbroek, Karin Hermana ;
Vergani, Carlos Eduardo ;
Machado, Ana Lucia ;
Pavarina, Ana Cludia ;
Giampaolo, Eunice Teresinha .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2013, 21 (06) :590-596
[3]  
Bernal Guillermo, 2003, J Prosthodont, V12, P111, DOI 10.1016/S1059-941X(03)00006-8
[4]   Microscopical and microbiologic characterization of customized titanium abutments after different cleaning procedures [J].
Canullo, Luigi ;
Micarelli, Costanza ;
Lembo-Fazio, Luigi ;
Iannello, Giuliano ;
Clementini, Marco .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (03) :328-336
[5]  
Canullo L, 2013, EUR J ORAL IMPLANTOL, V6, P251
[6]   Retention of CAD/CAM All-Ceramic Crowns on Prefabricated Implant Abutments: An In Vitro Comparative Study of Luting Agents and Abutment Surface Area [J].
Carnaggio, Thomas V. ;
Conrad, Robert ;
Engelmeier, Robert L. ;
Gerngross, Peter ;
Paravina, Rade ;
Perezous, Leticia ;
Powers, John M. .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2012, 21 (07) :523-528
[7]  
Catharino PCC, 2014, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V29, P321, DOI 10.11607/jomi.2842
[8]   Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns [J].
Covey, DA ;
Kent, DK ;
Germain, HAS ;
Koka, S .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2000, 83 (03) :344-348
[9]   Polymerization kinetics of pre-heated composite [J].
Daronch, M ;
Rueggeberg, FA ;
De Goes, MF ;
Giudici, R .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2006, 85 (01) :38-43
[10]   The Effect of CAD/CAM Crown Material and Cement Type on Retention to Implant Abutments [J].
de Oliveira Lopes, Adolfo Coelho ;
Machado, Camila Moreira ;
Bonjardim, Leonardo Rigoldi ;
Pedroso Bergamo, Edmara Tatiely ;
Ramalho, Ilana Santos ;
Witek, Lukasz ;
Coelho, Paulo Guilherme ;
Bonfante, Estevam Augusto .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (02) :E552-E556