Retention of zirconia crowns to Ti-base abutments: effect of luting protocol, abutment treatment and autoclave sterilization

被引:20
作者
Bergamo, Edmara T. P. [1 ]
Zahoui, Abbas [1 ]
Amorin Ikejiri, Larissa Luri [1 ]
Marun, Manoela [1 ]
da Silva, Kimberly Peixoto [1 ]
Coelho, Paulo G. [2 ]
Soares, Simone [1 ]
Bonfante, Estevam A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont & Periodontol, 9-75 Octavio Pinheiro Brisolla, BR-17012901 Bauru, SP, Brazil
[2] NYU, Dept Biomat & Biomimet, Dept Biomed Engn, Hansjorg Wyss Dept Plast Surg,Tandon Sch Engn Bro, New York, NY USA
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Dental implants; Dental prosthesis; Dental prosthesis Retention; Resin cement; Sterilization; CUSTOMIZED TITANIUM ABUTMENTS; METAL IMPLANT ABUTMENTS; RESIN CEMENTS; CONVENTIONAL WORKFLOWS; CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE; SINGLE CROWNS; FOLLOW-UP; SURVIVAL; AGENTS; RECONSTRUCTIONS;
D O I
10.2186/jpr.JPOR_2019_537
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the influence of resin cement type, surface pretreatment and autoclave sterilization on the retention of Y-TZP crowns to Ti-base abutments. Methods: Y-TZP crowns were designed and milled to fit Ti-base abutments. Crowns were cemented using either a conventional resin cement (conventional) with a universal adhesive or a self-adhesive resin cement (self-adhesive), both following no surface pretreatment (No) or Ti-base abutment sandblasting (SB) (n=20/group). Half of the cemented samples were subjected to in-office autoclave sterilization. Pullout testing was performed in a universal testing machine at a speed of 1 mm/min until crown displacement. Data were statistically evaluated through a linear mixed model following post hoc comparisons by LSD test. Results: Pullout data as a function of cement type demonstrated higher retention for conventional relative to self-adhesive cement (p<0.001). Ti-base sandblasting (SB) favored crown retentiveness over No pretreatment (p<0.001). Sterilized crowns exhibited higher pullout values than non-sterile (p=0.036). All the two- and three-factor interaction analyses corroborated with the superior adhesive strength of conventional compared to self-adhesive cement (all, p<0 .011), as well as, SB relative to No pretreatment (all, p<0.024). While autoclave sterilization maximized bond strength when self-adhesive cement (data collapsed over surface pretreatment, p<0.050) and No pretreatment were evaluated (data collapsed over surface pretreatment. p<0.013), no significant difference was observed for conventional resin cement (p=0.280) and SB (p=0.878) groups. Conclusions: Conventional resin cement and/or Ti-base sandblasting increased Y-TZP crown retentiveness, with no significant influence of autoclave sterilization. Autoclaving increased retentiveness when self-adhesive cement andlor no Ti-base pretreatment were used.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 175
页数:5
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Almehmadi Nehal, 2019, Dent Clin North Am, V63, P531, DOI 10.1016/j.cden.2019.02.014
  • [2] Adhesive bonding of resin composite to various titanium surfaces using diferente metal conditioners and a surface modification system
    Almilhatti, Hercules Jorge
    Neppelenbroek, Karin Hermana
    Vergani, Carlos Eduardo
    Machado, Ana Lucia
    Pavarina, Ana Cludia
    Giampaolo, Eunice Teresinha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2013, 21 (06) : 590 - 596
  • [3] Bernal Guillermo, 2003, J Prosthodont, V12, P111, DOI 10.1016/S1059-941X(03)00006-8
  • [4] Microscopical and microbiologic characterization of customized titanium abutments after different cleaning procedures
    Canullo, Luigi
    Micarelli, Costanza
    Lembo-Fazio, Luigi
    Iannello, Giuliano
    Clementini, Marco
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (03) : 328 - 336
  • [5] Canullo L, 2013, EUR J ORAL IMPLANTOL, V6, P251
  • [6] Retention of CAD/CAM All-Ceramic Crowns on Prefabricated Implant Abutments: An In Vitro Comparative Study of Luting Agents and Abutment Surface Area
    Carnaggio, Thomas V.
    Conrad, Robert
    Engelmeier, Robert L.
    Gerngross, Peter
    Paravina, Rade
    Perezous, Leticia
    Powers, John M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2012, 21 (07): : 523 - 528
  • [7] Catharino PCC, 2014, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V29, P321, DOI 10.11607/jomi.2842
  • [8] Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns
    Covey, DA
    Kent, DK
    Germain, HAS
    Koka, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2000, 83 (03) : 344 - 348
  • [9] Polymerization kinetics of pre-heated composite
    Daronch, M
    Rueggeberg, FA
    De Goes, MF
    Giudici, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2006, 85 (01) : 38 - 43
  • [10] The Effect of CAD/CAM Crown Material and Cement Type on Retention to Implant Abutments
    de Oliveira Lopes, Adolfo Coelho
    Machado, Camila Moreira
    Bonjardim, Leonardo Rigoldi
    Pedroso Bergamo, Edmara Tatiely
    Ramalho, Ilana Santos
    Witek, Lukasz
    Coelho, Paulo Guilherme
    Bonfante, Estevam Augusto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (02): : E552 - E556