Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data

被引:16
作者
Li, Kai [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Xuhua [1 ]
Wang, Wenbin [2 ,3 ]
Gao, Yang [3 ]
Zhao, Gang [1 ]
Tao, Enzhe [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Kexin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Shanghai Astron Observ, 80 Nandan Rd, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, 19 Yuquan Rd, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Space Utilizat Technol & Engn, Ctr Space Utilizat, 9 Dengzhuang South Rd, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
TG02; multipath; orbit accuracy; POD; centimeter-level; GPS DATA; PRECISE; SATELLITES;
D O I
10.3390/s18082671
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Tiangong-2, the second Chinese manned spacecraft, was launched into low Earth orbit on 15 September 2016. The dual-frequency geodetic GNSS receiver equipped on it is supporting a number of scientific experiments in orbit. This paper uses the onboard GNSS data from 3-31 December 2016 (in the attitude mode of three-axis Earth-pointing stabilization) to analyze the data quantity, as well as the code multipath error. Then, the dynamic and reduced-dynamic methods are adopted to perform the post Precise Orbit Determination (POD) based on the carrier phase measurements, respectively. After that, the orbit accuracy is evaluated using a number of tests, which include the analysis of observation residuals, Overlapping Orbit Differences (OODs), orbit comparison between dynamic and reduced-dynamic and Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) validation. The results show that: (1) the average Root Mean Square (RMS) of the on-board GNSS phase fitting residuals is 8.8 mm; (2) regarding the OODs determined by the reduced-dynamic method, the average RMS in radial (R), along-track (T) and cross-track (N) directions is 0.43 cm, 1.34 cm and 0.39 cm, respectively, and there are no obvious system errors; (3) the orbit accuracy of TG02 determined by the reduced-dynamic method is comparable to that of the dynamic method, and the average RMS of their differences in R, T, N and 3D directions is 3.05 cm, 3.60 cm, 2.52 cm and 5.40 cm, respectively; (4) SLR data are used to validate the reduced-dynamic orbits, and the average RMS along the station-satellite direction is 1.94 cm. It can be seen that both of these two methods can meet the demands of 3D centimeter-level orbit determination for TG02.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Atmospheric densities derived from CHAMP/STAR accelerometer observations [J].
Bruinsma, S ;
Tamagnan, D ;
Biancale, R .
PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2004, 52 (04) :297-312
[2]   The DTM-2013 thermosphere model [J].
Bruinsma, Sean .
JOURNAL OF SPACE WEATHER AND SPACE CLIMATE, 2015, 5
[3]   TEQC: The Multi-Purpose Toolkit for GPS/GLONASS Data [J].
Estey, Louis H. ;
Meertens, Charles M. .
GPS SOLUTIONS, 1999, 3 (01) :42-49
[4]  
Forste C., 2015, P EGU GEN ASS VIENN
[5]   Research on the impact factors of GRACE precise orbit determination by dynamic method [J].
Guo, Nan-nan ;
Zhou, Xu-hua ;
Li, Kai ;
Wu, Bin .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEODESY, 2018, 12 (03) :249-257
[6]   Pseudo-stochastic orbit modeling techniques for low-Earth orbiters [J].
Jäggi, A ;
Hugentobler, U ;
Beutler, G .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2006, 80 (01) :47-60
[7]   PRECISE ORBIT DETERMINATION FOR TOPEX POSEIDON USING GPS-SST DATA [J].
KANG, Z ;
SCHWINTZER, P ;
REIGBER, C ;
ZHU, SY .
ORBIT DETERMINATION AND ANALYSIS, 1995, 16 (12) :59-62
[8]   Precise orbit determination for the GRACE mission using only GPS data [J].
Kang, Zhigui ;
Tapley, Byron ;
Bettadpur, Srinivas ;
Ries, John ;
Nagel, Peter ;
Pastor, Rick .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2006, 80 (06) :322-331
[9]   Comparison of precise orbit determination methods of zero-difference kinematic, dynamic and reduced-dynamic of GRACE-A satellite using SHORDE software [J].
Li K. ;
Zhou X. ;
Guo N. ;
Zhao G. ;
Xu K. ;
Lei W. .
Journal of Applied Geodesy, 2017, 11 (03) :157-165
[10]   Precise orbit determination of the Fengyun-3C satellite using onboard GPS and BDS observations [J].
Li, Min ;
Li, Wenwen ;
Shi, Chuang ;
Jiang, Kecai ;
Guo, Xiang ;
Dai, Xiaolei ;
Meng, Xiangguang ;
Yang, Zhongdong ;
Yang, Guanglin ;
Liao, Mi .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2017, 91 (11) :1313-1327