Great Taste, Less Waste: A cluster-randomized trial using a communications campaign to improve the quality of foods brought from home to school by elementary school children

被引:25
作者
Goldberg, Jeanne P. [1 ]
Folta, Sara C. [1 ]
Eliasziw, Misha [2 ]
Koch-Weser, Susan [2 ]
Economos, Christina D. [1 ]
Hubbard, Kristie L. [1 ]
Tanskey, Lindsay A. [1 ]
Wright, Catherine M. [1 ]
Must, Aviva [2 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Gerald J & Dorothy R Friedman Sch Nutr Sci & Poli, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth & Community Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Fruits and vegetables; Elementary school children; Behavioral intervention; Innovative approaches; Nutrition communication; VEGETABLE CONSUMPTION; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; LUNCHES BROUGHT; FRESH FRUIT; INTERVENTIONS; ATTITUDES; ENVIRONMENTS; ADOLESCENTS; RELIABILITY; CHECKLIST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.02.010
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective. Great Taste, Less Waste (GTLW), a communications campaign, capitalized on the synergy between healthy eating and eco-friendly behaviors to motivate children to bring more fruits and vegetables and fewer sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) to school. Methods. A cluster-randomized trial in Eastern Massachusetts elementary schools in 2011-2012 tested the hypothesis that GTLW would improve the quality of foods from home more than a nutrition-only campaign-Foods 2 Choose (F2C)-or control. Lunch and snack items from home were measured at baseline and 7 months later using digital photography. Mixed linear models compared change in mean servings of fruits, vegetables, and SSBs among groups, and change in mean prevalence of packaging type. Change in prevalence of food items of interest was compared among groups using generalized linear models. Results. Five hundred and eighty-two third and fourth graders from 82 classrooms in 12 schools participated. At follow-up, no significant differences were observed between groups in change in mean servings or change in prevalence of items of interest. No packaging differences were observed. Conclusion. GTLW was well received, but no significant changes were observed in the quality of food brought to school. Whether classrooms are an effective environment for change remains to be explored. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 110
页数:8
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], J CHILD NUTR MANAG
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, NUTR STAND FOODS SCH
  • [3] Predicting intentions to purchase organic food:: The role of affective and moral attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behaviour
    Arvola, A.
    Vassallo, M.
    Dean, M.
    Lampila, P.
    Saba, A.
    Lahteenmaki, L.
    Shepherd, R.
    [J]. APPETITE, 2008, 50 (2-3) : 443 - 454
  • [4] Azjen I., 1980, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU
  • [5] Bandura A., 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.1987.4306538
  • [6] Strategies for sustainability: citizens and responsible environmental behaviour
    Barr, S
    [J]. AREA, 2003, 35 (03) : 227 - 240
  • [7] 'It's very hard to find what to put in the kid's lunch': What Perth parents think about food for school lunch boxes
    Bathgate, Katherine
    Begley, Andrea
    [J]. NUTRITION & DIETETICS, 2011, 68 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [8] Adolescents' perspectives and food choice behaviors in terms of the environmental impacts of food production practices: Application of a psychosocial model
    Bissonnette, MM
    Contento, IR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION, 2001, 33 (02): : 72 - 82
  • [9] Do ethnicity and gender matter when using the theory of planned behavior to understand fruit and vegetable consumption?
    Blanchard, Chris M.
    Kupperman, Janet
    Sparling, Phillip B.
    Nehl, Eric
    Rhodes, Ryan E.
    Courneya, Kerry S.
    Baker, Frank
    [J]. APPETITE, 2009, 52 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [10] Bonnett M., 1998, CAMB J EDUC, V28, P159, DOI [DOI 10.1080/0305764980280202?NEEDACCESS=TRUE, https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764980280202]