Changes in peri-implant soft tissue levels following surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:26
作者
Sanz-Martin, Ignacio [1 ,2 ]
Cha, Jae-Kook [2 ]
Sanz-Sanchez, Ignacio [3 ,4 ]
Figuero, Elena [3 ,4 ]
Herrera, David [3 ,4 ]
Sanz, Mariano [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Private Practice, Rue Grand Pont 2bis, CH-1003 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Dent, Res Inst Periodontal Regenerat, Dept Periodontol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Dent Clin Specialt, Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Complutense Madrid, ETEP Etiol & Therapy Periodontal & Periimplant, Madrid, Spain
关键词
mucosal recession; peri-implant diseases; peri-implantitis; peri-implantitis therapy; recession; systematic review; LATERAL BONE AUGMENTATION; REGENERATIVE TREATMENT; RESORBABLE MEMBRANE; CONSENSUS REPORT; THERAPY; DEFECTS; OUTCOMES; COMBINATION; SUBSTITUTE; DISEASES;
D O I
10.1111/clr.13840
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim To assess the changes in peri-implant soft tissue levels after the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. Methods Randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, cohort studies and case series, evaluating the changes in the position of the mucosal margin before and after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis, were searched. Secondary outcomes were changes in keratinized mucosa (KM), radiographic bone levels, probing depths (PD), plaque indices, bleeding on probing and patient perception. Meta-analyses were performed to determine weighted mean differences (WMD) or effects (WME). Results Twenty-six articles, reporting 20 investigations, were included. Reconstructive approaches yielded significantly less increase in mucosal recession, when compared to access flaps (n = 3, WMD = -1.35 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-2.62; -0.07], p = .038). When comparing among reconstructive surgical interventions similar outcomes were observed irrespective of the use of a barrier membrane (n = 3, WMD = -0.01 mm, 95% CI [-0.15; 0.13], p = .917). When considering the effects over time, limited mucosal recession was observed after reconstructive procedures (n = 23, WME = 0.389 mm, 95% CI [0.204; 0.574]), p = .001), while increased recession was reported with either resective or access flap surgery (n = 6, WME = 1.21 mm, 95% CI [0.70; 1.72], p = n = 3, WME = 0.95 mm, 95% CI [0.20; 2.10], p = .106; respectively). When resective and reconstructive approaches were combined the highest values on peri-implant recession were reported (n = 2, WME = 1.97 mm, 95% CI [0.81; 3.14], p < .001). Reconstructive surgical interventions were associated with greater radiographic bone level gains, while similar values were reported for PD reduction when comparing reconstructive, access and resective procedures. Conclusions Resective surgical procedures were associated with significant post-surgical recession while minimal recession was observed in regenerative interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 244
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions [J].
Berglundh, Tord ;
Armitage, Gary ;
Araujo, Mauricio G. ;
Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo ;
Blanco, Juan ;
Camargo, Paulo M. ;
Chen, Stephen ;
Cochran, David ;
Derks, Jan ;
Figuero, Elena ;
Hammerle, Christoph H. F. ;
Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa J. A. ;
Huynh-Ba, Guy ;
Iacono, Vincent ;
Koo, Ki-Tae ;
Lambert, France ;
McCauley, Laurie ;
Quirynen, Marc ;
Renvert, Stefan ;
Salvi, Giovanni E. ;
Schwarz, Frank ;
Tarnow, Dennis ;
Tomasi, Cristiano ;
Wang, Hom-Lay ;
Zitzmann, Nicola .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2018, 89 :S313-S318
[2]   The current use of patient-centered/reported outcomes in implant dentistry: a systematic review [J].
De Bruyn, Hugo ;
Raes, Stefanie ;
Matthys, Carine ;
Cosyn, Jan .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 :45-56
[3]   The adjunctive effect of a titanium brush in implant surface decontamination at peri-implantitis surgical regenerative interventions: A randomized controlled clinical trial [J].
de Tapia, Beatriz ;
Valles, Cristina ;
Ribeiro-Amaral, Tiago ;
Mor, Carolina ;
Herrera, David ;
Sanz, Mariano ;
Nart, Jose .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2019, 46 (05) :586-596
[4]  
Deppe H, 2007, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V22, P79
[5]   Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology [J].
Derks, Jan ;
Tomasi, Cristiano .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2015, 42 :S158-S171
[6]   Network Meta-Analysis for Evaluating Interventions in Implant Dentistry: The Case of Peri-Implantitis Treatment [J].
Faggion, Clovis Mariano, Jr. ;
Chambrone, Leandro ;
Listl, Stefan ;
Tu, Yu-Kang .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (04) :576-588
[7]   Volumetric assessment of tissue changes following combined surgical therapy of peri-implantitis: A pilot study [J].
Galarraga-Vinueza, Maria Elisa ;
Obreja, Karina ;
Magini, Ricardo ;
Sculean, Anton ;
Sader, Robert ;
Schwarz, Frank .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2020, 47 (09) :1159-1168
[8]   The Comparison of Porous Titanium Granule and Xenograft in the Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Prospective Clinical Study [J].
Guler, Berceste ;
Uraz, Ahu ;
Yalim, Mehmet ;
Bozkaya, Suleyman .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (02) :316-327
[9]   Treatment of Peri-implant Bone Defects with Platelet-Rich Fibrin [J].
Hamzacebi, Burak ;
Oduncuoglu, Bahar ;
Alaaddinoglu, Emine Elif .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2015, 35 (03) :415-422
[10]   Supportive peri-implant therapy following anti-infective surgical peri-implantitis treatment: 5-year survival and success [J].
Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa J. A. ;
Salvi, Giovanni E. ;
Mombelli, Andrea ;
Loup, Pierre-Jean ;
Heitz, Fritz ;
Kruger, Estie ;
Lang, Niklaus P. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (01) :1-6