Deep brain stimulation of the VIM thalamic nucleus modifies several features of essential tremor

被引:81
作者
Vaillancourt, DE
Sturman, MM
Metman, LV
Bakay, RAE
Corcos, DM
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Sch Kinesiol, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Bioengn, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Phys Therapy, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Dept Neurol Sci, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[5] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1212/01.WNL.0000086371.78447.D2
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Pharmacologic interventions (e.g., beta blockers) and thalamic lesions have failed to alter the pathophysiology of essential tremor (ET) beyond a reduction in tremor amplitude. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate (VIM) nucleus of the thalamus successfully reduces tremor rating scores. It is unknown how VIM DBS alters the pathophysiologic characteristics of ET. Objective: To determine the effects of VIM DBS on the neurophysiologic characteristics of ET. Methods: Hand tremor and EMG activity of forearm extensor and flexor muscles were recorded in six patients with ET ON-DBS and OFF-DBS and from six age- and sex-matched control subjects. Hand tremor was assessed across different inertial loads. The amplitude, frequency, regularity, and tremor-EMG coherence were analyzed. Results: VIM DBS reduced the amplitude, increased the frequency, decreased the regularity, and reduced the 1 to 8 Hz tremor-EMG coherence of ET. ON-DBS, patients with ET had greater tremor amplitude, lower frequency, more regularity, and greater tremor-EMG coherence compared to control subjects. Conclusions: Whereas pharmacologic and thalamic lesions have previously failed to change characteristics of ET beyond amplitude reduction, VIM DBS modified multiple features of ET. The changes in ET after VIM DBS provide strong evidence for clinical efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 925
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   CONTROL OF TREMOR AND INVOLUNTARY MOVEMENT-DISORDERS BY CHRONIC STEREOTAXIC STIMULATION OF THE VENTRAL INTERMEDIATE THALAMIC NUCLEUS [J].
BLOND, S ;
CAPARROSLEFEBVRE, D ;
PARKER, F ;
ASSAKER, R ;
PETIT, H ;
GUIEU, JD ;
CHRISTIAENS, JL .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1992, 77 (01) :62-68
[2]   Consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on tremor [J].
Deuschl, G ;
Bain, P ;
Brin, M .
MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 1998, 13 :2-23
[3]  
Deuschl G, 2000, NEUROLOGY, V54, pS14
[4]  
Elble R.J., 1990, TREMOR
[5]   QUANTIFICATION OF TREMOR WITH A DIGITIZING TABLET [J].
ELBLE, RJ ;
SINHA, R ;
HIGGINS, C .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 1990, 32 (03) :193-198
[6]   FACTORS INFLUENCING THE AMPLITUDE AND FREQUENCY OF ESSENTIAL TREMOR [J].
ELBLE, RJ ;
HIGGINS, C ;
LEFFLER, K ;
HUGHES, L .
MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 1994, 9 (06) :589-596
[7]   MOTOR-UNIT ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE FOR 8-HZ TO 12-HZ COMPONENT OF HUMAN PHYSIOLOGICAL FINGER TREMOR [J].
ELBLE, RJ ;
RANDALL, JE .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1976, 39 (02) :370-383
[8]   PHYSIOLOGICAL AND ESSENTIAL TREMOR [J].
ELBLE, RJ .
NEUROLOGY, 1986, 36 (02) :225-231
[9]   Tremor in ostensibly normal elderly people [J].
Elble, RJ .
MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 1998, 13 (03) :457-464
[10]   Central mechanisms of tremor [J].
Elble, RJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 13 (02) :133-144