About regression-kriging: From equations to case studies

被引:718
作者
Hengl, Tomislav
Heuvelink, Gerard B. M.
Rossiter, David G.
机构
[1] European Commiss, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, I-21020 Ispra, Italy
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Soil Sci Ctr, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Int Inst Geoinformat Sci & Earth Observ, NL-7500 AA Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
spatial prediction; multiple regression; GSTAT; environmental predictors; SRTM; MODIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cageo.2007.05.001
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the characteristics of regression-kriging (RK), its strengths and limitations, and illustrates these with a simple example and three case studies. RK is a spatial interpolation technique that combines a regression of the dependent variable on auxiliary variables (such as land surface parameters, remote sensing imagery and thematic maps) with simple kriging of the regression residuals. It is mathematically equivalent to the interpolation method variously called "Universal Kriging" (UK) and "Kriging with External Drift" (KED), where auxiliary predictors are used directly to solve the kriging weights. The advantage of RK is the ability to extend the method to a broader range of regression techniques and to allow separate interpretation of the two interpolated components. Data processing and interpretation of results are illustrated with three case studies covering the national territory of Croatia. The case studies use land surface parameters derived from combined Shuttle Radar Topography Mission and contour-based digital elevation models and multitemporal-enhanced vegetation indices derived from the MODIS imagery as auxiliary predictors. These are used to improve mapping of two continuous variables (soil organic matter content and mean annual land surface temperature) and one binary variable (presence of yew). In the case of mapping temperature, a physical model is used to estimate values of temperature at unvisited locations and RK is then used to calibrate the model with ground observations. The discussion addresses pragmatic issues: implementation of RK in existing software packages, comparison of RK with alternative interpolation techniques, and practical limitations to using RK. The most serious constraint to wider use of RK is that the analyst must carry out various steps in different software environments, both statistical and GIS. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1301 / 1315
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF GEOSTATISTICAL METHODS FOR ESTIMATING TRANSMISSIVITY USING DATA ON TRANSMISSIVITY AND SPECIFIC CAPACITY [J].
AHMED, S ;
DEMARSILY, G .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1987, 23 (09) :1717-1737
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, PLANE ANSWERS COMPLE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, DIGITAL TERRAIN ANAL
[4]   Spatial distribution of main forest soil groups in Croatia as a function of basic pedogenetic factors [J].
Antonic, O ;
Pernar, N ;
Jelaska, SD .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2003, 170 (2-3) :363-371
[5]   Comparison of regression and geostatistical methods for mapping Leaf Area Index (LAI) with Landsat ETM+ data over a boreal forest [J].
Berterretche, M ;
Hudak, AT ;
Cohen, WB ;
Maiersperger, TK ;
Gower, ST ;
Dungan, J .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 96 (01) :49-61
[6]   A comparison of prediction methods for the creation of field-extent soil property maps [J].
Bishop, TFA ;
McBratney, AB .
GEODERMA, 2001, 103 (1-2) :149-160
[7]  
BLEINES C, 2005, ISATIS ISATIS SOFTWA
[8]   Using multiple external drifts to estimate a soil variable [J].
Bourennane, H ;
King, D .
GEODERMA, 2003, 114 (1-2) :1-18
[9]  
Burrough P.A., 1998, Principles of Geographical Information Systems Oxford
[10]  
CHILeS J.-P., 1999, WILEY SER PROB STAT