Multi-criteria Analysis for Sustainable Buildings

被引:3
作者
De Angelis, A. [1 ]
Cheche, N. [1 ]
De Masi, R. F. [1 ]
Pecce, M. R. [1 ]
Vanoli, G. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sannio, Dept Engn, Benevento, Italy
[2] Univ Molise, Dept Med & Hlth Sci, Campobasso, Italy
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF ITALIAN CONCRETE DAYS 2016 | 2018年 / 10卷
关键词
Multi-criteria problem; Structural performance; Sustainability; TOPSIS; Weight assignment; RC floor; DECISION-MAKING;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-78936-1_1
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Currently climate and housing standards in parallel with the energy savings govern the performance required to buildings. Consequently, innovative multi-functional components try to satisfy both the requirements of structural safety and thermal performance, but the choice of the designer is difficult due to the complexity of this new market. In this paper, the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) analysis is proposed as suitable methodology that can provide adequate support for choosing the best building components between different alternatives. As case study, TOPSIS method (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) has been applied for comparing four different types of floor. The criteria assumed in the case study are referred to different fields as well as thermal, acoustic, air quality building science, structural performances, economic and human impacts. The case study allows to point out that the optimal solution depends on the importance (weight) that the decision maker assigns to each considered criterion.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 16
页数:14
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EN 1992-1-2: Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures - Part 1-2: General Rules - Structural Fire Design
[2]  
[Anonymous], 125722001 ISO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, 123542200009 EN
[4]   Application of multicriteria analysis in designing HVAC systems [J].
Avgelis, A. ;
Papadopoulos, A. M. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2009, 41 (07) :774-780
[5]  
Brown R, 2005, RATIONAL CHOICE AND JUDGMENT: DECISION ANALYSIS FOR THE DECIDER, P1, DOI 10.1002/0471716898
[6]  
co N, 2015, APPL THERM ENG
[7]  
Conklin J., 2006, Dialog Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems
[8]  
da Silva SM, 2010, C PAP INT NOIS SUST
[9]   COGNITIVE MAPPING [J].
EDEN, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1988, 36 (01) :1-13
[10]  
EN, 2000, EN 12354-1