Comparison of data-driven modelling techniques for river flow forecasting

被引:58
作者
Londhe, Shreenivas [1 ]
Charhate, Shrikant [2 ]
机构
[1] Vishwakarma Inst Informat Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Pune 411048, MH, India
[2] Datta Meghe Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Navi Mumbai 400708, MH, India
关键词
streamflow; data-driven modelling; artificial neural networks; genetic programming; M5 model trees; NEURAL-NETWORKS; RUNOFF; TREES; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1080/02626667.2010.512867
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Accurate forecasting of streamflow is essential for the efficient operation of water resources systems. The streamflow process is complex and highly nonlinear. Therefore, researchers try to devise alterative techniques to forecast streamflow with relative ease and reasonable accuracy, although traditional deterministic and conceptual models are available. The present work uses three data-driven techniques, namely artificial neural networks (ANN), genetic programming (GP) and model trees (MT) to forecast river flow one day in advance at two stations in the Narmada catchment of India, and the results are compared. All the models performed reasonably well as far as accuracy of prediction is concerned. It was found that the ANN and MT techniques performed almost equally well, but GP performed better than both these techniques, although only marginally, in terms of prediction accuracy in normal and extreme events.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1174
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
[31]   Data-driven modelling: some past experiences and new approaches [J].
Solomatine, Dimitri P. ;
Ostfeld, Avi .
JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2008, 10 (01) :3-22
[32]   M5 model trees and neural networks: Application to flood forecasting in the upper reach of the Huai River in China [J].
Solomatine, DP ;
Xue, YP .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2004, 9 (06) :491-501
[33]   Model trees as an alternative to neural networks in rainfall-runoff modelling [J].
Solomatine, DP .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2003, 48 (03) :399-411
[34]   Improving peak flow estimates in artificial neural network river flow models [J].
Sudheer, KP ;
Nayak, PC ;
Ramasastri, KS .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2003, 17 (03) :677-686
[35]   HYDROLOGICAL FORECASTING USING NEURAL NETWORKS [J].
Thirumalaiah, Konda ;
Deo, Makarand C. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2000, 5 (02) :180-189
[36]   RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS [J].
Tokar, A. Sezin ;
Johnson, Peggy A. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 1999, 4 (03) :232-239
[37]   Using time-delay neural network combined with genetic algorithms to predict runoff level of Linshan Watershed, Sichuan, China [J].
Wang, X. K. ;
Lu, W. Z. ;
Cao, S. Y. ;
Fang, D. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2007, 12 (02) :231-236