Limb salvage surgery for primary bone sarcoma of the lower extremities: Long-term consequences of endoprosthetic reconstructions

被引:69
作者
Ham, SJ
Koops, HS
Veth, RPH
van Horn, JR
Molenaar, WM
Hoekstra, HJ
机构
[1] Univ Groningen Hosp, Dept Surg Oncol, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen Hosp, Dept Pathol, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
limb salvage; multimodality therapy; bone sarcoma; endoprosthetic replacement; cementless fixation; revisional surgery; long-term survival; local recurrence; cancer survivorship;
D O I
10.1007/BF02303861
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy and endoprosthetic replacement for bone sarcomas of the lower extremity is well established. The specific long-term consequences of these endoprosthetic reconstructions for the patient's affected limb are unknown. Method: The oncologic results and the survival of the endoprostheses were reviewed in 32 patients with primary bone sarcoma of the femur or proximal tibia. There were 26 high-grade sarcomas, and 6 low-grade sarcomas. A proximal femoral endoprosthesis was used for reconstruction in 4 patients, a total or push-through femoral endoprosthesis in 11 patients, a distal femoral endoprosthesis in 15 patients, and a proximal tibial endoprosthesis in two patients. Results: Median survival was 10 years (range, 1.1 to 18.9 years) for patients with high-grade sarcoma, and 8.1 years (range, 7.1 to 10 years) for patients with low-grade sarcomas. Distant metastases developed in seven patients (22%), all with stage IIB sarcoma, with concomitant local recurrence in 3 patients (9%). Five-year overall and disease-free survival rates for high-grade sarcomas were 81% and 73%, respectively. The overall endoprosthetic survival rate was 87% at 5 years, 80% at 10 years, and 56% at 15 years. Median follow-up of the original endoprostheses was 8.3 years (range, 0.6 to 18.7 years). Endoprosthesis-related complications occurred in 13 patients (41%); most complications were mechanical failures. The highest complication rate was found in distal femoral replacements (60%); amputation was necessary in both patients treated with a proximal tibial endoprosthesis. Five endoprostheses (16%) were revised. An amputation of the involved limb was performed in four patients (13%): in two patients because of local recurrence and in the other two patients because of infection. For patients alive at follow-up, the median functional Enneking evaluation score was 22 points (range, 12 to 28 points), with the highest functional scores in patients with a distal femoral endoprosthesis, and the lowest functional scores in patients with total or push-through femoral replacements. Conclusion: Endoprosthetic reconstructions gave satisfying functional results in most patients after long-term survival. However, the proximal tibial and distal femoral endoprosthesis are particularly at risk for long-term endoprosthetic complications requiring additional surgical procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 436
页数:14
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
BACCI G, 1993, CANCER, V72, P3227, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19931201)72:11<3227::AID-CNCR2820721116>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-C
[3]   DISTAL FEMORAL REPLACEMENT BY CUSTOM-MADE PROSTHESES - CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP AND SURVIVORSHIP ANALYSIS [J].
BRADISH, CF ;
KEMP, HBS ;
SCALES, JT ;
WILSON, JN .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1987, 69 (02) :276-284
[4]   Massive prostheses for malignant bone tumours of the limbs [J].
Cannon, SR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1997, 79B (03) :497-506
[5]   MODULAR UNCEMENTED PROSTHETIC RECONSTRUCTION AFTER RESECTION OF TUMORS OF THE DISTAL FEMUR [J].
CAPANNA, R ;
MORRIS, HG ;
CAMPANACCI, D ;
DELBEN, M ;
CAMPANACCI, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1994, 76B (02) :178-186
[6]  
CAPANNA R, 1991, COMPLICATIONS LIMB S, P147
[7]   ENDOPROSTHETIC REPLACEMENT OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR AND ACETABULUM - A SURVIVAL ANALYSIS [J].
DOBBS, HS ;
SCALES, JT ;
WILSON, JN ;
KEMP, HBS ;
BURROWS, HJ ;
SNEATH, RS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1981, 63 (02) :219-224
[8]  
ECKARDT JJ, 1991, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P202
[9]  
ECKARDT JJ, 1991, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V22, P149
[10]  
ECKARDT JJ, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P188