The Seven-Year Cost-Effectiveness of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty A Markov Analysis

被引:29
作者
Kim, Jun S. [1 ]
Dowdell, James [1 ]
Cheung, Zoe B. [1 ]
Arvind, Varun [1 ]
Sun, Li [1 ]
Jandhyala, Chanakya [1 ]
Ukogu, Chierika [1 ]
Ranson, William [1 ]
Jacobs, Samantha [1 ]
McAnany, Steven [2 ]
Cho, Samuel Kang-Wook [1 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 5 East 98th St,4th Floor, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Hosp Special Surg, Orthopaed Surg, Spine, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
ACDF; anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; CDR; cervical disc arthroplasty; cervical disc replacement; cost-effectiveness; Markov analysis; mobi-C; QALYs; quality-adjusted life-years; single-level; RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; ARTIFICIAL DISC; FOLLOW-UP; REPLACEMENT; DISEASE; METAANALYSIS; HEALTH; RECOMMENDATIONS; DECOMPRESSION;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000002665
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Markov model analysis. Objective. The aim of this study was to determine the 7-year cost-effectiveness of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc replacement (CDR) for the treatment of cervical disc degeneration. Summary of Background Data. Both ACDF and CDR are acceptable surgical options for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc degeneration. Past studies have demonstrated at least equal effectiveness of CDR when compared with ACDF in large randomized Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) studies. Short-term cost-effectiveness analyses at 5 years have suggested that CDR may be the preferred treatment option. However, adjacent segment disease and other postoperative complications may occur after 5 years following surgery. Methods. A Markov model analysis was used to evaluate data from the LDR Mobi-C IDE study, incorporating five Markov transition states and seven cycles with each cycle set to a length of 1 year. Transition state probabilities were determined from complication rates, as well as index and adjacent segment reoperation rates from the IDE study. Raw SF-12 data were converted to health state utility values using the SF-6D algorithm for 174 CDR patients and 79 ACDF patients. Results. Assuming an ideal operative candidate who is 40-years-old and failed appropriate conservative care, the 7-year cost was $103,924 for ACDF and $105,637 for CDR. CDR resulted in the generation of 5.33 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), while ACDF generated 5.16 QALYs. Both ACDF and CDR were cost-effective, but the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $10,076/QALY in favor of CDR, which was less than the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000/QALY. Conclusion. ACDF and CDR are both cost-effective strategies for the treatment of cervical disc degeneration. However, CDR is the more cost-effective procedure at 7 years following surgery. Further long-term studies are needed to validate the findings of this model.
引用
收藏
页码:1543 / 1551
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Cost Utility Analysis of the Cervical Artificial Disc vs Fusion for the Treatment of 2-Level Symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease: 5-Year Follow-up [J].
Ament, Jared D. ;
Yang, Zhuo ;
Nunley, Pierce ;
Stone, Marcus B. ;
Lee, Darrin ;
Kim, Kee D. .
NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 79 (01) :135-144
[2]   ROBINSON ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISKECTOMY AND ARTHRODESIS FOR CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY - LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF 100 AND 22 PATIENTS [J].
BOHLMAN, HH ;
EMERY, SE ;
GOODFELLOW, DB ;
JONES, PK .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (09) :1298-1307
[3]   Relative abdominal adiposity is associated with chronic low back pain: a preliminary explorative study [J].
Brooks, Cristy ;
Siegler, Jason C. ;
Marshall, Paul W. M. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 16
[4]   Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial [J].
Burkus, J. Kenneth ;
Traynelis, Vincent C. ;
Haid, Regis W., Jr. ;
Mummaneni, Praveen V. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (04) :516-528
[5]  
Bydon Mohamad, 2014, Surg Neurol Int, V5, pS74, DOI 10.4103/2152-7806.130676
[6]   Cervical radiculopathy [J].
Carette, S ;
Fehlings, MG .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (04) :392-399
[7]   Adjacent Segment Disease Following Cervical Spine Surgery [J].
Cho, Samuel K. ;
Riew, K. Daniel .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2013, 21 (01) :3-11
[8]   Adjacent Segment Pathology after Anterior Cervical Fusion [J].
Chung, Jae Yoon ;
Park, Jong-Beom ;
Seo, Hyoung-Yeon ;
Kim, Sung Kyu .
ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (03) :582-592
[9]   THE ANTERIOR APPROACH FOR REMOVAL OF RUPTURED CERVICAL DISKS [J].
CLOWARD, RB .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1958, 15 (06) :602-617
[10]   The cost-effectiveness of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty for rotator cuff tear arthropathy [J].
Coe, Marcus P. ;
Greiwe, R. Michael ;
Joshi, Rohan ;
Snyder, Benjamin M. ;
Simpson, Lauren ;
Tosteson, Anna N. A. ;
Ahmad, Christopher S. ;
Levine, William N. ;
Bell, John-Erik .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2012, 21 (10) :1278-1288