Proximal arm non-use when reaching after a stroke

被引:22
作者
Bakhti, K. K. A. [1 ,2 ]
Mottet, D. [1 ]
Schweighofer, N. [1 ,3 ]
Froger, J. [1 ,4 ]
Laffont, I. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier, Euromov, Montpellier, France
[2] Montpellier Univ Hosp, Phys Med & Rehabil, Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Biokinesiol & Phys Therapy, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Nimes Univ Hosp, Phys Med & Rehabil, Le Grau Du Roi, France
关键词
Kinematic analysis; Non-use; Reaching; Stroke; Upper-limb; RECOVERY; TRUNK; COMPENSATION; PERFORMANCE; INDIVIDUALS; HEMIPARESIS; POSTSTROKE; MOVEMENTS; RESERVE; TASK;
D O I
10.1016/j.neulet.2017.07.055
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
After a stroke, many people "cannot and do not" use their paretic upper limb. With recovery, some people "can but do not" use their paretic upper limb and this non-use should be counteracted with specific rehabilitation. The aim of the study was to quantify one aspect of the non-use: proximal arm non-use when reaching within one's arm length in 45 post-stroke and 45 age matched controls. Arm use refers to the contribution of the shoulder and elbow motion to the hand movement towards the target. Proximal arm non-use is calculated as the ratio of the difference between spontaneous arm use and maximal arm use. We found that proximal arm non-use has very good test-retest reliability, does not depend on time since stroke, increases with impairment (Fugl-Meyer) and loss of function (Box & Block), and most importantly, that 61% of patients with lower impairment (Fugl-Meyer >28/42) exhibit proximal arm non-use. We conclude that quantifying proximal arm non-use in post-stroke individuals provides novel information that complements routine clinical measures. It is likely that proximal arm non-use quantifies one aspect of the motor reserve that therapists can target in patient specific rehabilitation programs. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 96
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke [J].
Alt Murphy, Margit ;
Resteghini, Carol ;
Feys, Peter ;
Lamers, Ilse .
BMC NEUROLOGY, 2015, 15
[2]   STROKE RECOVERY - HE CAN BUT DOES HE [J].
ANDREWS, K ;
STEWART, J .
RHEUMATOLOGY AND REHABILITATION, 1979, 18 (01) :43-48
[3]  
Bland JM, 1999, STAT METHODS MED RES, V8, P135, DOI 10.1177/096228029900800204
[4]   Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke [J].
Cirstea, MC ;
Levin, MF .
BRAIN, 2000, 123 :940-953
[5]  
FUGLMEYER AR, 1975, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V7, P13
[6]   Quantifying Arm Nonuse in Individuals Poststroke [J].
Han, Cheol E. ;
Kim, Sujin ;
Chen, Shuya ;
Lai, Yi-Hsuan ;
Lee, Jeong-Yoon ;
Osu, Rieko ;
Winstein, Carolee J. ;
Schweighofer, Nicolas .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2013, 27 (05) :439-447
[7]  
Hollander D. A., 2014, NONPARAMETRIC STAT M, V3
[8]  
Jeyaraman S, 2010, NEUROSCI MED, V1, P20, DOI [10.4236, DOI 10.4236]
[9]   Development and validation of a scale for rating motor compensations used for reaching in patients with hemiparesis: The reaching performance scale [J].
Levin, MF ;
Desrosiers, J ;
Beauchemin, D ;
Bergeron, N ;
Rochette, A .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2004, 84 (01) :8-22
[10]   Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis [J].
Levin, MF ;
Michaelsen, SM ;
Cirstea, CM ;
Roby-Brami, A .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 143 (02) :171-180