Assessment of 1 mSv Urinary Tract Stone CT With Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction

被引:29
作者
Glazer, Daniel I. [1 ]
Maturen, Katherine E. [1 ]
Cohan, Richard H. [1 ]
Davenport, Matthew S. [1 ]
Ellis, James H. [1 ]
Knoepp, Ursula S. [1 ]
Weadock, William J. [1 ]
Platt, Joel F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
CT; dose reduction; iterative reconstruction; urolithiasis; LOW-DOSE CT; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; URETERAL CALCULI; FLANK PAIN; UROLITHIASIS; MANAGEMENT; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.13.12271
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate stone detection, assessment of secondary signs of stone disease, and diagnostic confidence utilizing submillisievert CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in a North American population with diverse body habitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-two adults underwent stone CT using a split-dose protocol; weight-based projected volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were divided into two separate acquisitions at 80% and 20% dose levels. Images were reconstructed with MBIR. Five blinded readers counted stones in three size categories and rated "overall diagnostic confidence" and "detectability of secondary signs of stone disease" on a 0-4 scale at both dose levels. Effective dose (ED) in mSv was calculated as DLP multiplied by conversion coefficient, k, equal to 0.017. RESULTS. Mean ED (80%, 3.90 +/- 1.44 mSv; vs 20%, 0.97 +/- 0.34 mSv [p < 0.001]) and number of stones detected (80%, 193.6 +/- 25.0; vs 20%, 154.4 +/- 15.4 [p = 0.03]) were higher in scans at 80% dose level. Intrareader correlation between scans at 80% and 20% dose levels was excellent (0.83-0.97). With 80% scans as reference standard, mean sensitivity and specificity at 20% varied with stone size (< 3 mm, 74% and 77%; >= 3 mm, 92% and 82%). The 20% scans scored lower than 80% scans in diagnostic confidence (2.46 +/- 0.50; vs 3.21 +/- 0.36 [p < 0.005]) and detectability of secondary signs (2.41 +/- 0.39; vs 3.19 +/- 0.29 [p < 0.005]). CONCLUSION. Aggressively dose-reduced (similar to 1 mSv) MBIR scans detected most urinary tract stones of 3 mm or larger but underperformed the low-dose reference standard (3-4 mSv) scans in small (< 3 mm) stone detection and diagnostic confidence.
引用
收藏
页码:1230 / 1235
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [21] Practice Patterns in the Management of Urinary Lithiasis
    Scales, Charles D., Jr.
    [J]. CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2013, 14 (02) : 154 - 157
  • [22] Prevalence of Kidney Stones in the United States
    Scales, Charles D., Jr.
    Smith, Alexandria C.
    Hanley, Janet M.
    Saigal, Christopher S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (01) : 160 - 165
  • [23] Iterative Reconstructions versus Filtered Back-Projection for Urinary Stone Detection in Low-Dose CT
    Winklehner, Anna
    Blume, Iris
    Winklhofer, Sebastian
    Eberli, Daniel
    Gnannt, Ralph
    Frauenfelder, Thomas
    Alkadhi, Hatem
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (11) : 1429 - 1435