Assessment of 1 mSv Urinary Tract Stone CT With Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction

被引:29
作者
Glazer, Daniel I. [1 ]
Maturen, Katherine E. [1 ]
Cohan, Richard H. [1 ]
Davenport, Matthew S. [1 ]
Ellis, James H. [1 ]
Knoepp, Ursula S. [1 ]
Weadock, William J. [1 ]
Platt, Joel F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
CT; dose reduction; iterative reconstruction; urolithiasis; LOW-DOSE CT; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; URETERAL CALCULI; FLANK PAIN; UROLITHIASIS; MANAGEMENT; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.13.12271
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate stone detection, assessment of secondary signs of stone disease, and diagnostic confidence utilizing submillisievert CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in a North American population with diverse body habitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-two adults underwent stone CT using a split-dose protocol; weight-based projected volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were divided into two separate acquisitions at 80% and 20% dose levels. Images were reconstructed with MBIR. Five blinded readers counted stones in three size categories and rated "overall diagnostic confidence" and "detectability of secondary signs of stone disease" on a 0-4 scale at both dose levels. Effective dose (ED) in mSv was calculated as DLP multiplied by conversion coefficient, k, equal to 0.017. RESULTS. Mean ED (80%, 3.90 +/- 1.44 mSv; vs 20%, 0.97 +/- 0.34 mSv [p < 0.001]) and number of stones detected (80%, 193.6 +/- 25.0; vs 20%, 154.4 +/- 15.4 [p = 0.03]) were higher in scans at 80% dose level. Intrareader correlation between scans at 80% and 20% dose levels was excellent (0.83-0.97). With 80% scans as reference standard, mean sensitivity and specificity at 20% varied with stone size (< 3 mm, 74% and 77%; >= 3 mm, 92% and 82%). The 20% scans scored lower than 80% scans in diagnostic confidence (2.46 +/- 0.50; vs 3.21 +/- 0.36 [p < 0.005]) and detectability of secondary signs (2.41 +/- 0.39; vs 3.19 +/- 0.29 [p < 0.005]). CONCLUSION. Aggressively dose-reduced (similar to 1 mSv) MBIR scans detected most urinary tract stones of 3 mm or larger but underperformed the low-dose reference standard (3-4 mSv) scans in small (< 3 mm) stone detection and diagnostic confidence.
引用
收藏
页码:1230 / 1235
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 2011, SIZ SPEC DOS EST SSD, V204
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1999, European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography
  • [3] Through the Looking Glass Revisited: The Need for More Meaning and Less Drama in the Reporting of Dose and Dose Reduction in CT
    Bankier, Alexander A.
    Kressel, Herbert Y.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (01) : 4 - 8
  • [4] Boone John M, 2008, J Am Coll Radiol, V5, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.07.008
  • [5] Ureteral calculi: Diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients
    Boulay, I
    Holtz, P
    Foley, WD
    White, B
    Begun, FP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (06) : 1485 - 1490
  • [6] Current concepts - Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure
    Brenner, David J.
    Hall, Eric J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (22) : 2277 - 2284
  • [7] ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Onset Flank Pain-Suspicion of Stone Disease
    Coursey, Courtney A.
    Casalino, David D.
    Remer, Erick M.
    Arellano, Ronald S.
    Bishoff, Jay T.
    Dighe, Manjiri
    Fulgham, Pat
    Goldfarb, Stanley
    Israel, Gary M.
    Lazarus, Elizabeth
    Leyendecker, John R.
    Majd, Massoud
    Nikolaidis, Paul
    Papanicolaou, Nicholas
    Prasad, Srinivasa
    Ramchandani, Parvati
    Sheth, Sheila
    Vikram, Raghunandan
    [J]. ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2012, 28 (03) : 227 - 233
  • [8] The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain
    Dalrymple, NC
    Verga, M
    Anderson, KR
    Bove, P
    Covey, AM
    Rosenfield, AT
    Smith, RC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (03) : 735 - 740
  • [9] Department of Health and Human Services
  • [10] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, BOD MASS IND CONS PR