Assessment of 1 mSv Urinary Tract Stone CT With Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction

被引:29
作者
Glazer, Daniel I. [1 ]
Maturen, Katherine E. [1 ]
Cohan, Richard H. [1 ]
Davenport, Matthew S. [1 ]
Ellis, James H. [1 ]
Knoepp, Ursula S. [1 ]
Weadock, William J. [1 ]
Platt, Joel F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
CT; dose reduction; iterative reconstruction; urolithiasis; LOW-DOSE CT; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; URETERAL CALCULI; FLANK PAIN; UROLITHIASIS; MANAGEMENT; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.13.12271
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate stone detection, assessment of secondary signs of stone disease, and diagnostic confidence utilizing submillisievert CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in a North American population with diverse body habitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-two adults underwent stone CT using a split-dose protocol; weight-based projected volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were divided into two separate acquisitions at 80% and 20% dose levels. Images were reconstructed with MBIR. Five blinded readers counted stones in three size categories and rated "overall diagnostic confidence" and "detectability of secondary signs of stone disease" on a 0-4 scale at both dose levels. Effective dose (ED) in mSv was calculated as DLP multiplied by conversion coefficient, k, equal to 0.017. RESULTS. Mean ED (80%, 3.90 +/- 1.44 mSv; vs 20%, 0.97 +/- 0.34 mSv [p < 0.001]) and number of stones detected (80%, 193.6 +/- 25.0; vs 20%, 154.4 +/- 15.4 [p = 0.03]) were higher in scans at 80% dose level. Intrareader correlation between scans at 80% and 20% dose levels was excellent (0.83-0.97). With 80% scans as reference standard, mean sensitivity and specificity at 20% varied with stone size (< 3 mm, 74% and 77%; >= 3 mm, 92% and 82%). The 20% scans scored lower than 80% scans in diagnostic confidence (2.46 +/- 0.50; vs 3.21 +/- 0.36 [p < 0.005]) and detectability of secondary signs (2.41 +/- 0.39; vs 3.19 +/- 0.29 [p < 0.005]). CONCLUSION. Aggressively dose-reduced (similar to 1 mSv) MBIR scans detected most urinary tract stones of 3 mm or larger but underperformed the low-dose reference standard (3-4 mSv) scans in small (< 3 mm) stone detection and diagnostic confidence.
引用
收藏
页码:1230 / 1235
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 2011, SIZ SPEC DOS EST SSD, V204
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography
[3]   Through the Looking Glass Revisited: The Need for More Meaning and Less Drama in the Reporting of Dose and Dose Reduction in CT [J].
Bankier, Alexander A. ;
Kressel, Herbert Y. .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (01) :4-8
[4]  
Boone John M, 2008, J Am Coll Radiol, V5, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.07.008
[5]   Ureteral calculi: Diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients [J].
Boulay, I ;
Holtz, P ;
Foley, WD ;
White, B ;
Begun, FP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (06) :1485-1490
[6]   Current concepts - Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure [J].
Brenner, David J. ;
Hall, Eric J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (22) :2277-2284
[7]   ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Onset Flank Pain-Suspicion of Stone Disease [J].
Coursey, Courtney A. ;
Casalino, David D. ;
Remer, Erick M. ;
Arellano, Ronald S. ;
Bishoff, Jay T. ;
Dighe, Manjiri ;
Fulgham, Pat ;
Goldfarb, Stanley ;
Israel, Gary M. ;
Lazarus, Elizabeth ;
Leyendecker, John R. ;
Majd, Massoud ;
Nikolaidis, Paul ;
Papanicolaou, Nicholas ;
Prasad, Srinivasa ;
Ramchandani, Parvati ;
Sheth, Sheila ;
Vikram, Raghunandan .
ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2012, 28 (03) :227-233
[8]   The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain [J].
Dalrymple, NC ;
Verga, M ;
Anderson, KR ;
Bove, P ;
Covey, AM ;
Rosenfield, AT ;
Smith, RC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (03) :735-740
[9]  
Department of Health and Human Services
[10]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, BOD MASS IND CONS PR