Blockchain for Environmental Governance: Can Smart Contracts Reinforce Payments for Ecosystem Services in Namibia?

被引:17
|
作者
Oberhauser, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, Oxford, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN BLOCKCHAIN | 2019年 / 2卷
关键词
blockchain; smart contract; oracle; land cover classification; payments for ecosystem services; community-based natural resource management; MOBILE PHONE COMMUNICATION; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; CONFLICT; IMPACTS; PROGRAM; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.3389/fbloc.2019.00021
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Global South harbors some of the planet's most precious natural resources and is hence key in addressing the pressing environmental challenges of the Anthropocene. Here, payments for ecosystem services (PES) have recently gained importance as a means of environmental governance, increasingly complementing conventional command-and-control approaches. For instance, climate change is now mitigated through carbon offset payments and biodiversity loss is addressed through wildlife conservation performance payments. However, such payment schemes in the Global South face numerous challenges as identified by a large body of literature. This paper investigates if blockchain technology can help address some of the challenges by reinforcing PES programs with tamper-proof blockchain smart contracts. To this end, the paper presents a proof-of-concept of a blockchain-based wildlife conservation performance payments scheme in Namibia: the habitat integrity of an elephant corridor is assessed by remote sensing algorithms, which in turn trigger fictitious blockchain smart contract payments to surrounding communities. The application allows to practically discuss the potential of blockchain technology regarding three key aspects of PES: (i) effectiveness (conditionality) of environmental monitoring (ii) efficiency and transaction costs, as well as (iii) equity and benefit distribution. The case presented here is an example for linking the digital Blockchain sphere to practical challenges of natural resource management in the physical world. As such, it illustrates some potentials of the technology, but also shows how Blockchain technology is unlikely to provide transformative solutions in geographies with complex environmental governance.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Encouraging collaboration for the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale-Rethinking agri-environmental payments
    Prager, Katrin
    Reed, Mark
    Scott, Alister
    LAND USE POLICY, 2012, 29 (01) : 244 - 249
  • [42] Farmers' willingness to accept payments for ecosystem services on agricultural land: The case of climate-smart agroforestry in Ethiopia
    Haile, Kaleab K.
    Tirivayi, Nyasha
    Tesfaye, Wondimagegn
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 39
  • [43] The inherent trade-off between the environmental and anti-poverty goals of payments for ecosystem services
    Jayachandran, Seema
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 18 (02)
  • [44] Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for ecosystem services in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews
    Scullion, Jason
    Thomas, Craig W.
    Vogt, Kristina A.
    Perez-Maqueo, Octavio
    Logsdon, Miles G.
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 38 (04) : 426 - 434
  • [45] Can short-term payments for ecosystem services deliver long-term tree cover change?
    Calle, Alicia
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 42
  • [46] Design rules for successful governmental payments for ecosystem services: Taking agri-environmental measures in Germany as an example
    Meyer, Claas
    Reutter, Michaela
    Matzdorf, Bettina
    Sattler, Claudia
    Schomers, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 157 : 146 - 159
  • [47] How payments for ecosystem services can undermine Indigenous institutions: The case of Peru?s Ampiyacu-Apayacu watershed
    Ravikumar, Ashwin
    Uriarte, Esperanza Chairez
    Lizano, Daniela
    Farre, Andrea Munoz Ledo
    Montero, Mariel
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 205
  • [48] Putting nature 'to work' through Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): Tensions between autonomy, voluntary action and the political economy of agri-environmental practice
    Kolinjivadi, Vijay
    Mendez, Alejandra Zaga
    Dupras, Jerome
    LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 81 : 324 - 336
  • [49] Environmental benefits and changes in ecosystem services of climate-smart agriculture relative to conventional agriculture in Norway
    de Souza, Narie Rinke Dias
    Solberg, Marte Kristiane Mohn
    Hu, Xiangping
    Cherubini, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 377
  • [50] Facilitation of public Payments for Ecosystem Services through local intermediaries: An institutional analysis of agri-environmental measure implementation in Germany
    Schomers, Sarah
    Meyer, Claas
    Matzdorf, Bettina
    Sattler, Claudia
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2021, 31 (05) : 520 - 532